I think "bitcoin unlimited" is better than segwit. Yes or not? Becouse it more undestandable. Segwit it fail try to prevent BITCOIN CLASSIC existince. Segwit posible to do with litecoin, becouse litecoin have almost empty blocks, and in fact have zero segwit style transactions. But segwit imposible with BITCOIN, becouse segwit style transactions will be detected like double spend by BITCOIN CLASSIC miners very fast (1 or 2 blocks) and new blockchain will be regected. ----------- I think will be all 3 sort of BITCOIN BITCOIN-CLASSIC BITCOIN-SEGWIT BITCOIN-UNLIMITED And it will start new wave of speculations. ----------- Exchangers Position: poloniex.com/press-releases/2017.03.17-Hard-Fork/ ------------- Current statistic: blockchain.info/charts/bitcoin-unlimited-share blockchain.info/charts/bip-9-segwit
Miners have low acceptance for bitcoin classic, what about exchangers? Current support of exchangers and prices will completely change the distribution of miners.
Easton Brooks
I'm a data analyst at a Fortune 500 company. I live on Zero Hedge and post here when I'm not busy. I have sifted through the information for the past 24 hours. In order to ensure proper vigilance and attention to detail I consumed 200 mg of Adderall spaced out in a bi-hourly schedule. I also have been microdosing LSD for the past three years.
I can unequivocally say that there is absolutely nothing profound within this information. It is insubstantial at best, and outright exaggerations bordering on slander at worst.
It would likely be in everyone's best interest to focus on more pertinent issues as opposed to getting lost in a web of obfuscation.
Connor Anderson
how you know?
Parker Flores
bump
Josiah Powell
bump
Landon Brown
bump
Lincoln Howard
Sounds like your a Chinese miner supporting BU..trying to dig for support in back channels.. piss off, most don't like the big pool miner cry babies #realitypill
