Dictatorship of the proletariat was a mistake

Dictatorship of the proletariat was a mistake.

Other urls found in this thread:

naomiklein.org/articles/2011/02/democracy-born-chains
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>The state will "wither away"
>The wealth will "trickle down"

hmm

>implying

Oh that poor rich bag of money!

I feel so badly for him while I die of no health care!

Golly shucks gee! That poor rich person!

Now if you'll excuse me I have to go die from a infected splinter because MUH FREEDOMS.

You are dying from a splinter infection because you and your entire nation have been using antibacterials against the common cold and light fevers and now now every bacteria known to man has evolved resistance

You wanna know how I know you don't know how antibiotics works?

Yes, and?

Tell me

That particular strand of bacteria that has been causing common cold and light fevers can grow resistance to that antibiotics but that resistance won't spread to all bacteria that quickly

Really the biggest cause of antibiotics made obsolete is the extremely high usage in livestock in China where bacteria infection is more prevalent and the lack of discovery of new antibiotics

...

He might have misunderstood, antibiotics are used on chest and throat bacterial infections often linked to flu / cold / fever viral infections.

Antibiotics are used on bacterial infections, colds and most fevers are caused by viruses.

Yes. That's why people of the decadent west were all flocking to USSR and China for their first class medicine.

Ha. You smug twat, you don't know what an antibiotic even is let alone lecturing the other user.

Prove me wrong faggot. Antibiotics will be made useless by 2030s assuming a new one isn't discovered by then

tbqh it makes sense, dictatorship is the only natural power structure in Russia, if they intended to push commie ideals as far as they can they'd have to make do with dictatorship

They aren't used for treating viruses like colds for a start.

Whether they become obsolete is indeed one of the most pressing issues facing medicine but it certainly isn't just down to livestock use in China. 80% of antibiotic usage in the US is for livestock and some European countries use even more.

Over-prescription for medical needs is also a factor not an irrelevant one.

I assumed the cold was a symptom or cause of a bacteria infection.

Yea but the health standards in USA and European are much better. Any spread of bacteria resistance (or any pandemic in general) would probably come from there

Yea I guess but livestock usage is almost always ignored

>communism
>do whatever you want
>until the next 5 year plan rolls around the corner
>or until commissar sees you doing whatever you want as bad for the revolution

>Any spread of bacteria resistance (or any pandemic in general) would probably come from there

There's already a massive spread of bacterial resistance and it's coming from China and the US and Europe and everywhere that uses antibiotics.

The problem is political parties. Socialism and communism isn't usually the will of the whole proletariat. A vanguard party in this case is inherently authoritarian and makes the revolution itself authoritarian. By creating a single political party state you're creating an upper class. A disconnect is formed between the will of the people and the will of the party elite. The party may be made up of some of the people but it will never be of the entirety of the population. You're essentially just replacing the capitalist classes with communist ones. If the workers do not the production it's just state capitalism.

I'm so confused how communist or capitalist or fascist or whatever we are these days

It's almost as if people have difference views or something.

We knew that before the First International

It's weird when different institutions clash considering the power of the different institutions these days

I know antibiotics are used against bacteria, not viruses, but I am under the impression many Americans are not aware of that distinction or the danger of spreading resistance and so they will use it for light as well as viral infections to a greater degree than Europeans will.

as opposed to what? Capitalism has had many crimes

here is a historical picture.

>Apartheid
>bad

>/pol/
>wanted here

As opposed to organic, anarchistic communism you dork

Reminder that if you are in either the Red or Blue sqaures, you are supporting dictatorships

Make your case for apartheid being bad or fuck off with your ebin board war drama

>being "in squares"
SPOOKED

>Yea I guess but livestock usage is almost always ignored
maybe I am just talking out of personal experience but I find it really weird animal rights activist ((the vegan and vegetarian ones)) never bring up this issue how the meat market is spreading resistance to antibiotics.

Sorry didn't realise we had to justify why one group of humans systematically exploiting and oppressing another was bad.

But seriously fuck off tho

Apartheid South Africa was good for white people, post-apartheid is good for absolutely nobody. Even applying the simplest utilitarianism shows the former was better, faggot.

>Apartheid South Africa was good for white people
So fucking what?

>post-apartheid is good for absolutely nobody.
yeah because of the rich whites locally and globally forcefully preventing anyone from taking away their hoardes of money they had accumulated during apartheid.
naomiklein.org/articles/2011/02/democracy-born-chains

>Want to redistribute land? Impossible—at the last minute, the negotiators agreed to add a clause to the new constitution that protects all private property, making land reform impossible. Want to create jobs for millions of unemployed workers? Can’t—hundreds of factories were actually about to close because the ANC had signed on to the GATT, the precursor to the World Trade Organization, which made it illegal to subsidize the auto plants and textile factories. Want to get free AIDS drugs to the townships, where the disease is spreading with terrifying speed? That violates an intellectual property rights commitment under the WTO, which the ANC joined with no public debate as a continuation of the GATT. Need money to build more and larger houses for the poor and to bring free electricity to the townships? Sorry—the budget is being eaten up servicing the massive debt, passed on quietly by the apartheid government. Free water for all? Not likely. The World Bank is making private-sector partnerships the service norm. Raise the minimum wage to close the apartheid income gap? Nope. The IMF deal promises "wage restraint."12 And don’t even think about ignoring these commitments— any change will be regarded as evidence of dangerous national untrustworthiness, a lack of commitment to “reform,” an absence of a "rules-based system." All of which will lead to currency crashes, aid cuts and capital flight. The bottom line was that South Africa was free but simultaneously captured; each one of these arcane acronyms represented a different thread in the web that pinned down the limbs of the new government.

Oh yeah because that worked so well in Zimbabwe.

As is dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Hail the state.

You'd rather have s poor shithole where murder and rape is through the roof because the predecessor state, though both safer and stabler, conflicts with your misguided utilitarian world view?

>IT BE DA WHITEY'S FAULT
Fuck off.

>when people provide actual sources and /pol/ gets triggered.

Loving Every Laugh

You do realize that all the agencies listed are global organizations that aren't just NA/EU club, right?