Tits or Ass

Ass

If you like only one part then you're autistic, if you like the whole body then you're redpilled

They can be used as pillows.

...

A nice ass can make up for a lack of tits, but nice tits can't make up for a lack of ass.

Having both is excellent, but the ass is the foundation of the body.

Pits

ass

child-bearing hips numero uno concern

unless you are mongolian in which case it is to have tiny eyes

It can't refuse if it's dead.

Ass. Before the advent of baby formula, people probably saw huge exposed tits constantly. Take it from a man whose wife has breastfed three kids: that shit just kills all the mystery. I go to a strip club now and I don't even see the tits. But ass? Oh, yes.

Biologically speaking, 2 factors play into attractiveness of female humans. The first, which applies to men too, is symmetry. Greater bilateral symmetry means greater attractiveness (to a point, eventually it becomes creepily perfect). The second is waste-to-hip ratio, with a ratio of .7 being the cross-cultural average, with a range of .6-.75 or something. Considering that there are some cultures which do not even sexualize breasts, that larger breasts are more prone to asymmetry and that an emphasis is placed on general butt area ratios, clearly ass gets gold.

Throughout most of history breast weren't even sexualized you asshats.

Interesting, could you give example of creepily perfect and why does our brain process it as creepy?

ass

>Which one is more preferred in history?

I don't think fetishizing one body part to the exclusion of the rest is the norm at any point.

Counterpoint: people would have seen each other pooping far more than breastfeeding

You don't do you?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_history_of_the_buttocks

>You don't do you?

No, I don't.

> to the exclusion of the rest

Breast fetishization is synonymous with high iq cultures.

Spot on.

>the science is settled. evolution has chosen us for our attraction to the buttocks.

K-selective populations like whites and Asians have preferred tits.

r-selective populations like blacks have preferred ass.

Funny thing is this is actually reflected in modern porn statistics.

This basically.

Interesting, any source?

Nothing in nature is ever perfect, so when you look at a photoshopped face that's perfectly symmetrical, your brain knows it's unnatural

nice meme

...

But what purpose from evolutionary perspective would that warning of our brains have? Unnatural does not exist in nature.

Interesting picture, but why are Iranian people, central Asian nations fond of butts? Pakistan and India prefer boobs.

Proof Romanians and Amerilards are not white

Ass is less sexy in the world of street shitting.

Okay, explain Iranian people and central Asians?

>implying gypsies, blacks, and spics don't watch porn at far higher rates than whites

>Ass guys were more homos.
No.

This isn't even a proper chart or image. This is just a "who was online fapping to what on pornhub at this literal moment" thing.

film probably has a lot to do with it is my theory . Bollywood shots tend to focus on the front side of chicks hence tits are emphasized. notice that Egypt is an outlier in liking tits while it is also the film capital of the Arab world.

>North Korea

You instinctively fear something you don't understand

>bosnia and albania have the lowest iq in europe
It's true, holy shit.

A woman with no ass is disgusting and no matter how perfectly shaped, sized, or emphasized her tits can be it won't make up for the lack of ass. Also there's nothing "gay" about liking ass. I'm pretty certain most early societies and civilizations would've put a lot of emphasis on the buttocks, hips, and thighs as the strength of those would help determine how successful a woman would survive birth-giving.

Look up shione cooper

No ass great tits. Not disgusting at all

/thread

Tits are just a fake upper body ass anyway

No thanks.

>NoK

So Kim is a butt guy?

>buttocks, hips, and thighs as the strength of those would help determine how successful a woman would survive birth-giving.

This is just as much of a myth as "big boobs make more milk."

"Ass men" confirmed third world savages.

>hip width is irrelevant for child birth
uhhhh sweetie no

The Nork was probably an American proxy

Don't do this. The user just tricked me into looking her up and she's a horrible fatty with pendulous sagging melons.

Wrong.

Is ass high test? Why is this?

wew I wonder what the women who you fuck look like you must be very wealthy or something

>birth-giving hips
>"a myth"
This is what titfags actually THINK

No fatf

penis >> ass > tits >>>>>>>>>>> vagina

Pakistanis confirmed as white. And people in the UK are scared of being replaced lol.

White people - tits
Niggers - ass

>iceland
>niggers

>he doesn't inow

Why do I have to only like one?

It is a myth you stupid faggots. The width of the birth canal matters, but that's independent of the width of the hips. Wide hips are just signaling, just like big boobs.

Correlates with the sick size chart

Tits r 4 dicklets confirmed

Why is this thread still up?

I got a banner for a day for making an actually relevant sex history thread.

Fuck Veeky Forums has some stupid ass mods.

big tits feed the baby better so they became a symbol of fertility so we get mad bonerz over them

Wrong.

Face and mouth

>butts
>fahrenheit
>imperial system
>Trump's shenanigans
How is the US not a third world country?

I cannot choose: both have different purposes and design.
Much like cats and dogs, it's a choice that has been forced on society without their consent.

kek

I agree with this but still prefer arses; simply because they look nicer and that's where the feelsgoodman holes are located.

Shiet, you nailed it.

Counter Argument:

Wife breastfed 1st and going on 2nd. Still rather have a set of epic breasts over a thick ass.

t. Formula fed as infant

A cute face.

>india
>tits
IQ theory btfo

What utter bollocks, you stupid nigger

I am a swede, so I'm an ass man, because without a stable foundation, you have a unstable top. History tells us swedes that's shitty.

Tits