Satoshi lacked foresight

>supposed to be decentralized, owned by fucking chink miners
>slow transaction speed, in a world where computers get better by the day
>etc

how come there hasn't appeared the bitcoin killer yet?

Stupid FUD. Ignore

Chink miners can only stall changes to the protocol. That's not "control", idiot.

bitcoin is the ultimate shitcoin, and everyone knows it

but whales and sentimental purists keep other coins down based on tradition and brand loyalty and shit

totally irrational nonsense that goes against TEHCNOLOGY AND PROGRESS

it's literally all just about chink miners and the white cucks who don't want to insult them so the coin stays valuable

>muh satoshi

reminder: satoshi is LITERALLY some middle aged australian white weeb who sweats a lot when talking

Bitcoin or any crypto for that matter has not truly began life yet. even the biggest one is still a "maybe someday" case as far as playing a significant role in the economy goes.

There's not going to be an anything-killer until something achieves mainstream status.

That's not him, tard

>how come there hasn't appeared the bitcoin killer yet?

There has, it's called Decred.

Shhh

Shit coin

Hurr reverse shilling

quieten down child

My bad

the time will come for us, until then we must exist only in the shadows

It's easy to say in hindsight that someone lacked foresight 10 years ago...

LOL!

prove it

There already is a bitcoin killer, it's called IOTA.

XMR is the coin that BTC could have been.

>Invented an incredible new technology, solved unsolved problems in computer science

>Why didn't he predict all of the ramifications that would result from it forever and ever, what an idiot

There's already a bit coin killer, it's called RDD

Shhh, don't tell them. I'm trying to accumulate ;)

Don't worry, nobody cares about it.

There is already a BTC killer. Its called DGB

you spelt bitbean wrong

thanks just bought 100k

>hey guys lets make bitcoin the new world currency
>oh wait, the majority is owned by a handful of whales that can manipulate the market at will and we have no regulations in place to prevent them from doing so and due to the anonymity we will never know who they are

vertcoin is literally what bitcoin should've been

Guys it's minereum

>hey guys let's make US dollars the world currency
>90% of it is held by a group of 12 people
>we will never know who they are because they use privacy laws and attorneys as agents to remain anonymous
>these people not just have control over the market, but the entire world economy

Bitcoin is objectively better.

DGB, Chancoin and RDD are the answer.

>2017 Being this retarded.

Anything with community-based governance is retarded by design, because people are retarded. You can reduce the risk by making the tools too obtuse for idiots to access, but idiocy runs deep even at the highest level of societies. For a cryptocurrency to succeed as a store of value and means of exchange, it needs to be guided by a benevolent dictator.

Unsolved problems?

how much do you think Satoshi cashed out of Bitcoin?

XMR couldn't had been done in 2009, privacy wasn't that compromised back then and done of the tech behind it like ring cryptography wasn't mature enough

You know that less than 0.01% of the world population holds 95+% of the fiat in the world, right? Chinks have less than 70% of the total hashrate in Bitcoin
Also, it literally can be made to whatever wishes of a small group of non democratically elected bankers want

Byzantine general's problem

the muslim scourge will be purged. Byzantium will rise again!

>it must be done

It didn't really solve it though, but it's good enough as a practical solution

cringe

The double spend problem

acid attack

>short crypto
>drive to different state
>purchase disposable phone
>call in a bomb threat to the genisis mining facility
>ditch the phone, bury it in a faraday cage so they can never track it
>make 5 billion dollars

It's so easy it's not even funny.

well the transaction speeds wouldnt be so bad if core had changed a couple lines in the sourcecode and raised the blocksize instead of trolling everyone into thinking nodes that are 200 mb big "would lead to too much decentralization", so dont blame god satoshi for that.

it's cores fault that a bitcoin isnt 10000$ dollars now. read both /r/btc and /r/bitcoin and check your echochamber induced ignorance at the door on the way out.

okthxgtgbai

You're an idiot, this isn't a matter of 200mb lmfao and this WOULD result in decentralization. It's not a real solution. How much scaling does it provide? Barely any with regards to orders of magnitude. For a big blockchain size increase

The algorithmic complexity of the scaling "solution" of increasing block size is not feasible and Satoshi did not want this he chose the block size for a reason

And you're mistaken it would not lead to decentralization, that's what we want - it would lead to centralization

Lines of code are irrelevant "hurr it's a 1loc fix and they're blocking it!"

It's not the RIGHT fix. The fix itself won't scale, you'll have to keep doing it, it's a fucking bandaid

You clearly know NOTHING about scalable software design

that ausfag already proved it when he folded under the pressure himself. Couldnt even back up the shit he claimed, probably wouldnt have said shit if bitcoin didnt go over 100$, he just wanted some attention and money

As if not increasing the blocksize would help in scaling.

It would help scaling but not decentralization, which is what he was arguing.

>blaming chink miners
It's decentralized alright. There's nothing preventing people outside chinkland from participating.