Why do early depictions of Moors (pic related) show them with light skin...

Why do early depictions of Moors (pic related) show them with light skin, but later ones (the flags of Sicily and Sardinia, Shakespeare's Othello) conflate them with Africans?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbas_ibn_Firnas
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muladi
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Its easier to villify an enemy if he looks different than you.

his question is why weren't the moors dark skinned from the beginning

Because ignorant monks did all the drawings.

WE

WUZ

The moors ended up being just Visigoths LARPING as Umayyads.Just look at the description of Abderraman the III
> .. white skin, blue eyes and attractive face; good looking, although somewhat sturdy and stout. His legs were short, to the point that the stirrups of his saddle were mounted just one palm under it. When mounted, he looked tall, but on his feet he was quite short. He dyed his beard black.[17]
That is why it is so funny when Moroccans that are legit mulattos LARP as if they had anything to do with the caliphate or the Taifas

because they were North of the Sahara, and on the West coast at that. Getting from Sub-Sahara to the Mediterranean was hard as fuck unless you were a legitimate camel jockey or you went down the Nile or Red Sea.

Seems like cherry picking. The vast majority of Moors were Berbers and Arabs.

>The vast majority of Moors were Berbers and Arabs
No they weren't at least before the Almohad invasion. How is a member of the royal family cherrypicking Mohamed Halalabibi Tariq?

>Berbers

Some of them are white as fuck, for whatever reason.

>Visigoths and Romans

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors
>The term has also been used in Europe in a broader, somewhat derogatory sense to refer to Muslims in general,[6] especially those of Arab or Berber descent, whether living in Spain or North Africa.
The Moors in Hispania were a mix of Christians and Muslims but the invading ones from North Africa were Berber and Arab. Morrocans today who are mostly Berber can claim North African ancestory.

Moroccans are mulattos.And most muslims in Spain were local converts.Even the royal family was more visigothic than arab
>Some of them are white as fuck, for whatever reason.
Because they ain't berbers.The white ones are germanic descendants or latins

This
Its probably similar to Turkey where the western part are more 'white' than the rest, although they have the same culture as their eastern counterparts (or in Moors case, their southern counterparts)

>Moroccans are mulattos
No. Their Negroid composition is ancient and isn't enough to classify them as "mulattos". Tunisia which from your image which has little to none SSA genes is mostly Berber.

>most muslims in Spain were local converts.Even the royal family was more visigothic than arab
The Moors in Hispania were, yeah. But the rest in North Africa were Berber. The Almoravid and Almohad Kingdoms were of Berber origin and had their capitals in North Africa.

>The Moors in Hispania were, yeah
The NA onew were useless barbarians
>The Almoravid and Almohad Kingdoms were of Berber origin
Correct and that is why they were useless barbarians
> and had their capitals in North Africa
The Añmohad capital was in Seville

>33% nigger
>Not mulattos

>The NA onew were useless barbarians
As I said, many in Iberia were mixed, and many scientists and inventors were of Berber-Arab origin.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbas_ibn_Firnas
Even Averroes wasn't likely a local.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muladi

>The Añmohad capital was in Seville
Most of the time, the capital was in North Africa. Hell, most of the territory was in North Africa.

Algeria and Tunisia is Berber as well. 33% isn't really mulatto either.

As the Moors began to decline politically and economically, they became more uncommon around the northern shores of the Mediterranean. Their material culture also began to diverge, and as Islam went from a generic pagan ignorance to the enemy par excellence the Moor was made more exotic.

Some Biblical touches like the Curse of Ham also helped.

Mercenaries and miscegenation.

MOORS

Because conceptions of race have changed hugely over time

Saharan often were black and it's stated as such, the Mediterranean coast was not so much by the greco-roman period. But south Morocco in the Draa was black from recorded history so much so that amogst some of the old Moroccans I know that they use Draa to mean very dark ethnic Moroccans.

Old Roman accounts spoke to the "aethiopians" of the Draa as well.

Remember the Sahara is quite new
This
You have to really question these tests, desu they never include rural southerners that retain Berber cultural traits and yet amongst them L3 persists.

The early Moors from caliphate era are mostly native Iberians with Berber and Syria-Levantine Arab ruling class
The latter moors post Taifa period are Invaders from north Africa which at the time, has spread and extend their power base to include sub Saharan Africans

Because who ever was doing the illustrations didn't even fucking know how they looked like, the fact that they're dressed in western knightly attire should be fucking telling enough. The just painted what was familiar to them.

I wanted to post that painting of Jesus Christ carrying the cross where the roman soldiers are depicted wearing 15c full plate armour to illustrate my point but I can't fucking find it anywhere.