Were the ottomans basically muslim romans?

Were the ottomans basically muslim romans?

Well they were about as Roman as the Byzantines were, that's for sure.

They're Muslim Trojans

They were Romans yes.

That is fascinating. It makes one wonder if there was any similar trojan vengeance behind the Greco-Italian War also.

>mfw this made me like the ottomans a little

It's delusional nonsense, but his heart is in the right place...

This map is incredible exaggerated. The Ottomans only held Crimea in Ukraine, only controlled the northern coastlines of North Africa save for Tunisia and Egypt, had no territory in Chad, Niger not much territory in Sudan and just a slither of territory in Eritrea.

the Byzantines were the direct continuation of the Roman Empire - the Ottomans were conquerors, it doesn't mean they're the same thing

Ottomans were humorless and stuffy compared to romans.

They had the ambition for sure. It's implied in his correspondence between Mehmet II and his sadrazam that he wanted to take Rome. Thus his invasion of Otranto as a foothold in Italy. He died before any meaningful advance though. Also he called himself Kayser-i Rum (Caesar of Rome)

Just like Anglo-Americans are Cherokee/Sioux/Navajo.

They held Podolia for a time period. They never reached Galicia, though.

Jesus Christ, does Turkish WEWUZism know no end?

Because you had the sultanate of Rum not long before
The No the British empire was the true third Rome
>created colony in Crimea to save the last byzantines
>Britain was founded by a Trojan fleeing the wreckage of Troy
>all kings became English overtime just like how Syrians and berbers called themselves TRVE ROMANS
>at its peak had puppet kings in all important countries
>almost brought to ruin by German betrayal
>but bounced back and then slowly declined to be sacked by a German again only to continue on in a different land that throughly used British culture

Who didn't WEWUZ Trojans?

Byzantine successor state, just like the Odoacer in Italy.
jk, have literally no idea what this question is meant to mean.

Not at all, the Romans left a positive impact on mankind and made strides for human civilisation, the Ottomans did literally nothing but go to war and occupy.

But the Turks weren't Roman at all?

TURKISH continuation of the ROMAN empire

islam just a meme for the sultan to use as casus belli

here is the actual map

nobody called them "Byzantines" while they were around idiot. Everyone called them Romans, they called themselves "Empire of the Romans", and finally their government was a direct continuation of the roman empire.

Don't act as if you ever listened to ottoman music or read ottoman poetry.

>""eastern""
>"""roman"""
>"""""empire"""""

that turkey today is wrong

>No the British empire was the true third Rome
this
nice quads

...

Like the Byzantines? kinda...

Is this the origin of anatolism?

I don't even know who should the turks wewuz as since they are all extremely mixed but at least they should wewuz as the turkic (TURKIC ISN'T TURKISH BTW) tribes of central asia.

Who is "Ottomans"? Turks were Asians, but they were minority of Ottoman empire even in 18 century.

when you're descended from horse people who's only culture is murder and rape, you gotta grab hold of something real every now and again, even if it isn't yours.

They literally called thier emperor "Caesars"

If we're going to call the Ottoman Empire the political successor of the Roman state we might as well call the Odacerian Kingdom and the Holy Roman Empire Roman too, right? Just because some Ottoman Sultans claim to be the "descendants of caesar" doesn't mean they actually were the rightful heirs of the Roman Empire. The Ottomans were the gravediggers of what remained of the Eastern Roman Empire.

aw

They named themselves kays-i-rum (if i named it right) and the sultan who conquered the byzantines planned to invade southern italy but died soon after.

MUH HERITAGE

That's what everyone calls their emperors dumbass. Most European words for emperor originate from Ceasar's name