Is Veeky Forums Templar or Assassin board?

Is Veeky Forums Templar or Assassin board?

>ubisoft will never drop this TAMPLARS VS ASSISSYS bullshit and make independent historical games

Hitler was an assassin. Of jews.

I wouldn't mind it if they just cut out the bullshit about everything being in the future. Just make historical games, even if they have a templar vs assassin theme

I feel like Alexander fits more as an assassin

>hurr durr lets take random people and put them on sides
Awful tier. Having Elizebeth of England, Leondando Da Vinci, Napeleon Bonaparte and Nokola Tesla in the same secret society makes no sense.

>hurr no fun allowed
the game itself is ancient aliens-tier

this game is awful stop promoting it, what the fuck is this chart even, templars have acces to the first emperor of china? This sounds we wuz tier. And why the fuck do all of these great people get thier greatness from dumb objects like whatever the fuck the "apple of eden" is, no considereation for how those people rose to power/ came to thier conlusions fhisghojnjios


asshatins breed is dumb stop playing it forever

>lenin

O boi lets stop them templars from controling society by creating a controlled society

>Churchill and Lenin on the same team.

Explains a lot.

>Lenin
>Believing in ideals such as freedom from authority and individualism
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*breathes in*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Napoleon isn't a fucking Assassin you moron. In fact, he's actually been a pain in their ass couple of times. He only sought power for himself and held no allegiance.

>historical figures we like are all assassins

THIS LIST IS LITERALLY CANNONICALLY WRONG, STOP POSTING IT.

Honestly Assassin's Creed would be much better without the Assassin's vs Templars crap.

Looking back on it now, why is the Assassins Creed series so cringy?

>Le EPIC socialist assassin dudes with their hoods and sleeve knives
>Karl Marx
>Evil Christian templars who want to destroy the world and enslave the working class
>This game was developed by a multicultural team of varying faiths and beliefs

First after they employed the whole blue haired nazis in their company.

Before it was a simple shitflinging contest between 2 zealous organization, that want artifacts of human precursors for their own goals.

Also weren't the protagonists of newest ass creed factory owner and gangleader, but also butt buddies with old Marx?

Because AAA videogaymes are made for fucking retards to play them, not for people interested in factual events.

LENIN WAS NOT A GOOD GUY

But he was a good goy

Marx was best buddies with Engels, who was a factory owner himself, so it is not that outlandish

The fucking white text for Ford annoys the hell out of me.

Marx was overall a hypocritical piece of shit

Churchill was literally a templar

You can always tell who is a filthy millennial progressive by whether they support Tesla or Edison.

how the fuck could the templer order be able to have cobections so far away as china in anicent times?
Assasins creed is a retarded normie game

Lenin

>good

Alexander

>bad

Literally fucking kill yourself. Find a vat of acid and pour it over your miserable fucking skull.

I'm pretty sure Churchill, Hitler, Stalin and FDR were all Templars and WW2 was just a ruse so they could get the magic space apple from some Jewish guy. Assassins Creed has the stupidest lore.

As someone who has actually played these games, I feel I should point out that the assassins are not necessarily the good guys and templars not necessarily the bad guys. They're both essentially benevolent, albeit with bad seeds.

Also, and I didn't have to say this, but it's just a game, not srs bzns.

Adolescence is thinking the Assassins are the good guys.

Adulthood is realizing the Templars are the real good guys.

>being this mad

Lenin was actually a very good guy. Read a book user :)

fucking stupid i remember my friend getting angry when i started laughing at him when he told me Hitler was Templar.He said in such a passionate way like it was some major revelation.

Hitler didn't need to be part of some super secret evil club he was head of the Nazi party He really did those things Ian! ww2 wasn't just some shit video game conspiracy story Ian!

Because the society itself is much much older, they just changed their name in the middle ages and stuck with it.

That's the handwave excuse anyway.

>>Believing in ideals such as freedom from authority

it's like you dont comprehend the oppression excreted by capitalists upon their wage slaves

What in the world is going on now in creed lore that the Templars existed during Alexander's conquests and Xerxes' rulership?

The idea is that they've been around for literally all of human history. The first Templar was Cain and the first Assassin was Abel.

>thinking that even pseudo-realistic history is appealing to the great unwashed

yeah but still, how could they have contacts and influence from Greece too China in anicent times?

So disgusting.

so what club was Stalin in?
let me guess Trotsky is an good guy assasin and Stalin was a templar infiltrator or some other retarded shit?

Yes. Powerful figures were almost all Assassin or Templar.

This is so lame.
So, so lame.

weren't xerxes and alexander bros at the end, or am I confusing something

God I'm an idiot, nevermind.

Stalin and Trotsky were both assassins

We are a Templar board. Alexander the Great and Adolf Hitler are our guys

The first game was pretty good - strange warrior cult of personality doing the bidding of a strange old man. Have some higher principles, but certainly weren't "goody two shoes"

Then you fast forward after that and the Assassin's are "guardians of free thought and speech" and the Templars are just plain evil.

Then you start throwing in every major historical as either belonging to one or the other camp, this nonsense writes itself.

The crusades were also an interesting time in History, I thought the settings didn't improve after it.

>MUH ECONOMIC RIGHTS SUPERCEDE POLITICAL RIGHTS
Top kek, were you paying attention to the 20th century you fucking commie

Yeah, I missed the bus with AC and only played the first game after several sequels were already out, but I really enjoyed its stealth/parkour/hack'n'slash mix and its morally ambiguous dual storyline, despite finding the gameplay just a teensy bit rough, and too easy. So naturally I was very keen to try the sequels, but they took the exact opposite path to the one I was hoping for. They made the Assassins just generic good guys who kill bad guys and are also super good at fighting and they can totally beat like an entire army but they choose not to because they're too SECRET so they sneak through the shadows to deliver JUSTICE to the EVIL TEMPLARS. They also made the ridiculousness of the outfits scale with the ridiculousness of the story, and made the games even easier with even more overpowered and unrealistic gimmick weapons and equipment. I mean come on, a fucking pocket glider? Not to mention
>1 vs 50
>the 50 come at you 1 at a time, with about 5 seconds between each

Honestly just disappointing, it really could have been an excellent series

I had no idea this existed. It's like some autistic shit you'd find on deviantart.

Stalin was not aligned with either side but he was off handedly manipulated by the templars.

Templars
>we believe in order but sometimes our ideals get corrupted

Assassins
>lmao we just love killin anyone who isn't an ANCOM autist

Also, like the other user in this thread said, the idea that people rise to power through magical objects is dumb and makes the storylines way less interesting. Half the appeal of history is following the crazy ways people rise to power. AssAssin's Creed takes compelling stories and ruins them with deus ex machina bullshit.

You can see that Ubisoft logic
>Tesla
He smart and "underrated", he good assassin
>Elizabeth
She defeat muh evil catholics, she good assassin
>Edison
He smart, he good assassin
>Churchill
He fight muh evil nazis, he good assassin
>Leonardo
He smart, he good assassin
>Napoleon
Okay this is the only guy viewed evil by mainstream on "good" side
>Nightingale
She smart, she good assassin
>Lavoisier
He smart, he good assassin
>Lenin
He fight for poor, he good assassin

>Ford
He like nazis, he evil templar
>Edison
He steal some stuff from Tesla, he evil templar
>Alexander
He wage many wars, he evil templar
>Hitler
He evil nazi, he evil templar
>Shi Huangdi
He kill muh poor Chinese, he evil templar
>Borgia
He degenerate and kill opponents, he evil templar
>Xerxes
He fight good Greeks, he evil templar
>De Molay and Paynes
He templar, he evil templar

>Templars existed before Christianity
They could at least put in some effort.

Is it ok if I want to DEUS VULT but agree with the assassin belief of self governance?

...

>Qin Shi Huang
>funded by Templars
what fucking retard thought of that?

HOW THE FUCK WAS HE FUNDED BY TEMPLAR'S WHEN HE DIED OVER 200 YEARS BEFORE CHRIST WAS EVEN BORN!!!!

>"look mom i made an epic maymay"

Have you actually played the game? The Templars in AC universe are far from Christian order.
kek

this, black flag was the best

Because the struggle between Templars and Assassins is ancient and dates back to Cain and Abel

I actually liked that element a lot.

They just lost me at the whole "holographic aliens created computer apples so lets kill Desmond and never give the people the chance to play as Desmond for an entire game in the MODERN WORLD and instead make a game where our assassin is spiderman with a top hat."

Yeah yeah I'ma over critical butthurt fanboy....I just really enjoyed the first few games, specifically the very first one, and the mystery of what was going to happen next.

ugh God.