Nice argument there pal
Read the fucking bread book
Are Humans inherently collectivists?
This. Humans are social animals but its not the same as collectivism although the first humans were collectivist right?
>i blindly support this dumb ideology because it's cool to be edgy
>read this book because i'm to dumb to explain my arguments
Humans have inherent ingroup preferences. This is an evolutionary trait needed for survival. If we couldn't distinguish ourselves from, lets say a bear we'd be pretty much screwed. This extends to human groups with a favor towards are family, tribe and ethnicity.
I don't mind sharing and working on the behalf of people I love and care about. I don't feel used, because I know they appreciate me and do what they can to support me in return. This feeling doesn't extend very far past my circle of family and close friends. There's plenty of people out there happy to exploit me and my family for their own benefit without ever giving anything in return. I don't owe that person anything, I have no incentive to provide for them, so I won't.
Sorta.
We do tend to work together, it's sort of our thing as a species, but we're also more than willing to bail if the group's about to throw the individual under the bus.
We're collectivists as long as the individuals involved feel cool with the collective.
Yes
Fuck off, fucking Tankies
>Red white and black hammer and sickle
subtle
The hammer and sickle aren't red, white and black.