in light of the tragic terrorist attack in Manchester today
we all know one religion responsible for it
what are the unique reasons why Islam is violent compared to Christianity now a days
in light of the tragic terrorist attack in Manchester today
we all know one religion responsible for it
what are the unique reasons why Islam is violent compared to Christianity now a days
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
huffingtonpost.com
independent.co.uk
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
30% of Muslims follow the apocalyptic cult version of the religion.
The terrorist attacks are very related to how many retarded babies born in the first world are rebels without a cause and join terrorist groups trying to find some meaning for their privileged lives tho.
The rest are just sandniggers who are too stupid to see what they are doing.
they never really had a reformation or enlightenment
>what are the unique reasons why Islam is violent compared to Christianity now a days
The absolute inflexibility of the Quran and sharia law regarding infidels.
this exactly this
christianity, historically, never had a slavish devotion to the bible to the level Muslims have with the Quran
even with Martin Luther's muh sola scriptura, it was never that serious
>slavish devotion
>no reforms
>inbreeding
>christianity, historically, never had a slavish devotion to the bible to the level Muslims have with the Quran
re: Puritians and Evangelicals
>christianity, historically, never had a slavish devotion to the bible to the level Muslims have with the Quran.
Meanwhile, in other threads on Veeky Forums...
>LMAO Y ARE CATHOLICS PAGAN
>KYK ITS NOT IN DA SCIRPTCHUR DOOD.
sects did.....but the whole entire religion of Islam both Shia and Sunni view the Quran as the unaltered word of Allah
Protestant cucks
>what are the unique reasons why Islam is violent compared to Christianity now a days
It's an Arab problem, not a Muslim problem. Most Muslims live in India, Indonesia, and Central Asia, and don't really bug anyone.
The type of Shia Islam Iran expouses is a sect. Not all Shias accept the idea that the Guardianship of the Jurist extends to everybody. The Salafist/Wahabbi doctrine expoused by most terrorist is also a sect. The muslim world is still divided on the interpretation of the Koran despite is being the suppose word of God. Hadith also play a role.
My Shia friend says the terrorists follow the teachings of religious leaders and hadiths whatever those are.
He says they are all heretics who pay no heed to the Quran. Is this true?
WHO CARES ABOUT WHY MUDSLIMES DO MUDSLIME THINGS?
Back to redito kiddo
I wouldn't go that far. There are issues with Muslims in those regions as well. Look at the protests against Christians in Indonesia or the various conflicts Muslim's have had with the Hindu's historically speaking.
That said, I think the issue with Muslim's is more political than it is religious but I don't think we should pretend there aren't issues with the Muslim's living in those regions.
Well Chris. Hitchens makes a suprisingly good point about Hamas' suicide bombers in Jerusalem. They didnt stop bombing because the Palestinians became less miserable. Rather it was because "nasty, vicious, fanatical old men, not human emotions, were making the decisions and deciding the days and hours of death."
In that regard it's less following the Koran and more upholding a death cult. I think there's a grain of truth to what your friend said tho at the end of the day what determines the religion is which sect has the most guns.
The West backed fundamentalist radicals and dictators during the Cold War to destabilize the Middle East, in order to keep the Russians from having any control of it
They never bothered to clean up the mess until after their chickens had come home to roost on 9/11
Unironically it is because Muhammad was a professional warrior. Both Christianity and Islam are designed to replicate their founder's personality within their adherents because Jesus and Mohammad are the ideal Christian and Muslim respectively.That there are passages in the Koran which take place on the battlefield and depict Mohammad himself engaged in warfare means that wherever Islam is preached there must always be war because war is forever enshrined in their most holy text and by the actions of their prophet. Conversely Jesus was a craftsman who's most violent outburst consisted of Him flipping tables and whipping some merchants. It is extremely significant that Jesus never partook in deadly combat as Mohammad did and this goes to the heart of the difference between these two faiths.
Islam isn't to blame, it's the region and the hate towards the west. If it was Islam, we would be seeing a lot more Indonesian suicide bombers. This is why all the talk of banning Muslims is counter-productive, you're just feeding the fire and validating the narrative that the west is incompatible with Islam and must be irradicated.
If it is just because of regional hate, how come there are no secular/Christian/Jewish/pagan Middle Eastern suicide bombers?
How can the West be compatible with Islam when Islam demands Sharia law?
Because the West is retarded and keeps on funding and has funded extremist muslim groups without any foresight.
There are all kinds of extremist groups in the world but only the Islamic ones do suicide bombings, why is that?
THATS ALI NOT MOHAMMAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Yes, they are the only ones who do suicide bombings, but there are other groups that have massive attacks.
I can't remember how exactly suicide bombing got started (iirc it was hizbullah but I'm not sure) but a religious extremist group is naturally have people willing to die if they're promised paradise, which isn't the same for secular terrorist groups
>why is that?
Theologically the Quran is literally the word of god in Islam, like it's considered a miracle that it exists and Mohammed is just the last prophet. It's not really comparable to the position of the Bible within Christianity
Pretty much what said
But Christians and pagans believe in an afterlife, why don't they blow themselves up when they go to war? How come only Muslims do it?
Plenty of terrorist groups use suicide tactics.
But how come only Muslims blow themselves up a pop concerts?
No idea
It's just a good tactic I guess
If it was such a good tactic you'd think other groups would use it as well but only Muslims do it so there must be something special about Islam that makes people blow themselves up.
Wahhabism.
can we just delete this polshit thread? you're more likely to be killed by a right winger than a muslim. stop trying to justify your fear of brown people with your retarded "muh terrorism" narrative, when it's white men who are actually the dangerous ones.
It's a good tactic for people who are willing to die for their cause. I don't actually know the Islamic position on auicide in general but it's sinful in all Christian sects so it wouldn't take root there and secular groups wouldn't want to kill themselves for their cause
Other groups aren't at such a technological disadvantage that they need to rely on improvised explosives to kill others. Mass shooters kill themselves at the end of their run too. It's not like the 'essence of Islam' is manifest in these actions, it's just what disenfranchised young men tend to do.
Willing to die for your cause is does not require blowing yourself up at an Ariana Grande concert.
No one is saying isis are master strategists
And you don't need to post a pic with every post you make
Why are you hung up on suicide bombings specifically?
I just want to know why it is only Islamic young men who do suicide bombings specifically. There are plenty of other disadvantaged militants who rely on improvised explosives, Timothy McVeigh for example, but yet only Muslims do suicide bombings. It really makes me think.
>don't post images on an image board
But Christians are still significantly more violent than Muslims
They had both, and, unlike Christians, they had more than one Reformation and Enlightenment
Because there was another one in Manchester today.
Muslims are right wingers of the worst kind, sweetie.
fuck off
umm honey mohammad was a feminist. dont you read huffpo??
huffingtonpost.com
There are bombings all over the world daily
Also
>today
This is a history board
asking a history question
So if there was a gunman who shot up the crows and offed himself, that would be ok? Throughout this thread, you're bringing up the fact that Muslims are the only ones doing suicide bombings
You do understand that Islam mandates its followers to emulate Jesus too, right? In Islam, Jesus is considered as much a perfect Muslim as Muhammed is, which is why explaining the difference between Christianity and Islam by comparing Jesus and Muhammed is extremely retarded.
Not really
Only the earliest parts of Islamic suicide bombings fall in the jurisdiction of this board
Is your concern the combination of explosives and suicide? Because Islamists don't necessarily die when they commit acts of terror (sometimes guns are used, or trucks) and sometimes get caught. And other forms of terror (mass shootings) the terrorist sometimes ends up killing themselves anyway. Are you trying to suggest there is something in the Koran about explosives?
Are you retarded?
Muhammad was a warlord
literally Islam's most cherished figure was a man that spread Islam with the sword and conquered and killed people
you can obviously see why this important fact could cause Islam to be unique compared to Christianity and Islam
look, little triggered poltards can't handle the truth
go back to your echo chamber, nazis
Because most Christians have access to advanced weapons and therefore do not have to use this tactic.
thats why the vast majority of terror attacks on the planet are of islamic origin
The Jesus of the Gospels and the Jesus of the Koran are two completely different people. It's absurd that Muslims believe the Koran's depiction of Jesus is accurate when it was written five hundred years of His birth.
Christianity also condemns suicide in every case, while it's more of a gray area in islam
Wiping some village off the map with a drone or missile isn't a terror attack?
Again, Jesus is as respected in Islam as Muhammed is, which is why the differences between Jesus and Muhammed do not explain the differences between Christianity and Islam, especially if you take into consideration that Christians venerate people who were as violent as Muhammed.
oh it's the >muh western intervention is the reason for islamic terrorism
even though most islamic terrorists are young western middle class men who have no political baggage besides
>they were mean to me
are you really compairing bombing suspected ISIS targets to mudslimes bombing a Arianna Grande concert
The vast majority of Muslim terrorists live in Muslim countries and kill other Muslims
The vast majority of both Christians and Muslims condemn suicide in virtually all cases. Muslims use suicide bombings more often than Christians for strategic, not theological reason. The belief that Islam permits suicide bombings is a heterodox view within Islamic theology
>oh it's the >muh western intervention is the reason for islamic terrorism
No. How about answering that question?
Muslims are simply incapable and incompatible of being civilized in Western culture
Yet all the suicide bombings are done by Muslims.
I would like to know why suicide bombings are unique to Muslims.
Yes I don't understand why non-Muslim terrorists aren't also blowing themselves up.
no because the intent between western bombing and islamic attacks are radically different that even attempting to create a compairson is laughable
>not being a consequentialist
Kys
Islam is the most violent religion on the planet at this moment
their is no dispute
"Suspected" is the key word here, the USA kills off of suspicion and often has massive collateral damage as a result of these stupid attacks, then blames Islam. ok
>Yet all the suicide bombings are done by Muslims
That's objectively not true.
Both are acts of war, yes? What I'm getting at is that 'terror attacks' are usually defined as having an Islamic origin so of course most 'terror attacks' are going to be of Islamic origin since that is literally their definition.
...
The most violent religion at the moment is objectively Christianity. Who do you think killed more innocent people in the last decade, ISIS or US?
...
You realize it could something that Islamic terrorist groups have taken up as a tactic and will leave behind once something else comes by, right?
Why is it that Shia symbolism is always used to portray Sunni terrorist attacks? This picture you're using depicts Husayn who's venerated by the Shiites for dying at the hands of the Sunni caliph in a place called Karbala
so the 19 year old belgian born westerner that joins ISIS is a result of western colonialism?
>US
>Christian
It's actually not that different. The Quran doesn't depict him as a warlord.
>Yes I don't understand why non-Muslim terrorists aren't also blowing themselves up.
Few use explosives. The ones who did wanted to keep blowing stuff up. It's also probably so heavily associated with Islam now that non-Muslims wouldn't do it.
comparing State actions and linking them to religion is laughable
...
why is Islam the most violent religion on the planet
someone answer me this.
Don't know about that
>More than 80 per cent of more than 900 suicide bombings last year hit military targets
Islamic terrorists didn't even invent suicide bombing.
The Koran claims that Jesus didn't actually die on the cross and that contradicts even the non-Christian sources we about Jesus!
This whole thread started with a discussion of the state action, you imbecile
Isn't it Husayn?
That's Christianity
What do you think the first S stands for in ISIS?
the fact is the most violent religion on the planet is Islam
the VAST MAJORITY of terror attacks are of islamic origin
why is that?
Irrelevant
Are you saying that U.S Bombing of ISIS targets is because of christian reasons?