Is he the most based socialist leader?

Is he the most based socialist leader?

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/sf9tYGd
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's funny because commies always use him as an example about how "great"
"communism"""""" is when in reality Tito would've personally shot them in the face for using his name in any regard

Tito was alright. Even people who hate him still like and admire him.

Hitler was.

>lives on Western loans
>get called the "most based socialist leader" because the debt crisis never kicked in until after you died

He was just a based leader. Socialism was the prevailing meme at the time so he picked it up.

i'm from serbia and he was very based but i hate him

Yeah my friends friend spent 10 years in jail just for smoking some boof weed (less then a gram) Tito would've probably laughed at the people using him as an example of great """communism""" he said it was a communist state to keep the Serbs at bay while he was only barely socialist

/thread
the cycle of socialism:
economic crisis - > revolution - > debt piling due to intrinsic improductivity - > economic crisis - >

nah. It's pick related

I admire that he managed to somehow keep Yugoslavia together for as long as he did.
On a similar note, I realized I don't know much about Uncle Draza. Where would be a good place to start learning about him?

yugos started killing each other as soon as western gibs stopped coming.

nah. It's icepick related

Literally worse than Stalin

would be interesting to see his market socialist system be inplemented in germany or scandinavia and see if it worked out,
It failed in Yugoslavia but it might have been because south slavs like all meddie's and east euros are lazy leeches

You owe your life to meds and other Balkan """""niggers""""

Draža wasn't a bad guy but as he said it in his own words he set out to accomplish too much and got lost along the way.
Chetniks in general however were shit, they were a very dectralized movement and many units were nothing more than marauding bands.

>improductivity
Do you mean unproductivity?

I'd say Lenin but he wanted a more capitalist society

New Veeky Forums General Discord:
discord.gg/sf9tYGd

>Hurr durr join ma dickscord XDD

>tito
>socialist

Epic

We BunkerBoys now?

>no enemy bomber can reach the Ruhr
>if one reaches the Ruhr, my name is not Göring
>you may call me Josip Broz

what did he mean by this?

NAŠ TITO

Yugoslavia under Tito was definitely the best place to live in Eastern Europe at the time. In fact it was better than most of the former Yugoslav states today.

...but it was all a recipe for disaster. All the ethnic groups in the Balkans were at eachother's necks by the end of World War II. Tito had to unite them somehow, and his only solution for doing so was creating a cult of personality. It was really the only thing keeping Yugoslavia together, so once he was dead, civil war would be inevitable. Not to mention all the debt the country accumulated thanks to him which he made sure would only bite the country in the ass when he was already gone. See

It was a short-lived paradise that could have never lasted. So even for the standards of a shitty nihilistic ideology like marxism, I can't say he was totally based.

Yugoslav have been killing each other for decades before Tito was even born

eh no

No, that title belongs to Brother Number 1

He meant that Slavs were the true Aryans all along

He and Gaddafi were probably the most benevolant Socialist leaders during their times. Who knew Goering would taker to socialism so well?

poor (none) plan of succession
left a terribly fragmented society
borrowed incessantly

t.darkcuck

No,

No, and that's coming from a Yugo.

he can be a gommie but at least he gets some bonus points for telling stalin to fuck off repeatedly

...