Why does EA have black characters in the game when it is a well known historical fact that blacks did not serve in the...

Why does EA have black characters in the game when it is a well known historical fact that blacks did not serve in the military at that time?

Other urls found in this thread:

steamcharts.com/app/242860
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They've overplayed it without a doubt, but there were actual Negro combat soldiers for the US. By WW2 they were no longer allowed to be combat soldiers.

Gameplay = abstractions with gimmicks
Art style = abstractions with gimmicks
Music = abstractions with gimmicks
Story = abstractions with gimmicks
Black people in WW1 = abstractions with gimmicks

Wrong. Pictured is the Kang's Own Royal Wewuzment putting down mutineers, 1914, colorized.

haha dank af my dude
take a trip on the upboat from me xd

EA put niggers in the game because they are huge cucks who wants to appeal to sjw. pic related, don't tell me it wasn't intentional

she's not black tho

It's an American published game developed by a Swedish studio, what did you expect?

...

t. burger

>Why isn't this video game produced by a multinational corporation that is primarily concerned with making money 100% historically accurate in an age when diversity sells and where exclusively white soldiers would be denounced
HMMM THIS IS A REALLY HARD QUESTION TO ANSWER, WE SHOULD HAVE A HISTORY THREAD ON THE HISTORY BOARD ABOUT IT

The presence of female soldiers triggers me a lot more than the presence of black soldiers. Blacks did fight in the war. In extremely small numbers, yeah, but they were there. Women soldiers? Nope. Complete and utter fiction with no basis in reality whatsoever.

pls don't be racist it is triggering to my fellow comrades

>In the name of the tsar
>tfw you'll never play as a bolshevik
Trash

I don't remember anyone denouncing Verdun for being 100% male and white,.

Okay I will make the proper edits
>Why isn't this video game produced by a multinational corporation that is primarily concerned with making money 100% historically accurate in an age when diversity sells
HMMM THIS IS A REALLY HARD QUESTION TO ANSWER, WE SHOULD HAVE A HISTORY THREAD ON THE HISTORY BOARD ABOUT IT

>tfw when you'll never be able to kill a bolshevik

>WWI game where automatic rifles are littered around the battlefield

>WWI game where soldiers are dressed in metal plate armor carrying portable gatling guns and somehow almost invulnerable to bullets

>WWI game where Allied tanks are for some reason being operated by the Ottomans and Austrians

>complaining about black people in a video game

It's honestly past the point where I care, Dice put entertainment value first and and just used the history piece as a setting.

admittedly, playing an authentic WWI game where you sit in a trench until it's time to go over and get mowed by machine gun fire wouldn't be much fun, so I can only complain so much with a game I honestly have fun with.

Because it's played by less than a thousand people. Niche shit can get away with it.

EA has no interest in historical accuracy. It wants to reach as many markets as possible and including black people is a way to do that.

>M-muh sjws
This has nothing to do with social justice. It's all about money. When diversity stops selling, companies will move away from it. In the meantime, understand that the current economic structure is a powdered whore that will sell itself out to anyone.

steamcharts.com/app/242860
>all time peak: 2300
hmm

it is about appealing to social justice for muh consumerbux. the biggest lie post cold war millenials have swallowd is that corporations are gud bois who dindu nuffin

>tfw you'll never be able to kill whites, figuratively and literally

>Russians didn't serve in WW2
>American education

Expecting a Battlefield game to be more than "grounded" in reality is pretty stupid to begin with desu

...

Russia deployed female combat troops in 1917.