Why is there no Geng-HER Khan?

> implying there is a limit to the amount of freedom someone can have
> implying women could not have liberated themselves
> implying the feminist movement is shitty
> implying women have the inability to rule
> implying I am a fool

You are clearly a sexist basement dweller that gets his history from vidya. Women could have liberated themselves if given the chance to mount peaceful protests, but men would just keep violently oppressing them. If women have the inability to rule then how do you explain Angela Merkel? She is the defacto leader of the EU. She manages to be both powerful AND humanitarian. What was germanys last great male leader again? Oh thats right, literally Hitler.

Good job, more of this everyone

>Why is there no Geng-HER Khan?
Ching Shih.

The most powerful pirate leader in history was a chink girl.

This user already mentioned her. How about someone other than a whoring chinese pirate? The question was about LAND conquering leaders anyway you dindong.

Sorry IDK why I did that, I mean this user

There was Artemisia I of Caria, who captured at least one Greek city while allied with Xerxes.

Though she was mostly a naval commander too. What is it with bitches and warships?

its because women fucking weren't allowed to be warlike and had to stay with their children and watch the deaths of their husbands,brothers,and fathers

Seeing this many of the women leaders probably favored peace and bettering of the country,as they knew that their attempts to have revenge would result in the same way as other women felt
if they could of liberated themselves then why not
oh wait violent oppression
or was it that THEY HAD FUCKING KIDS TO WORRY ABOUT
you can't d shit like that,in modern ages yeah that was more possible because your country wasn't at war every 10 seconds but when your country WAS at war every 10 seconds its very hard to eat and protest

Merkel is fucking shit,she lets these foreigners in with literally the lowest iq you could have without being retarded,then says its ok when they drive over people and rape,like other western countries. Being Humanitarian just isn't gonna cut it anymore,you have to put your country before others.

Feminism was a mistake,it hurts the economy,promotes the destruction of family values and makes life harder

There was also Jeanne de Clisson who started fucking up French ships to avenge her husband's death. ancient-origins.net/famous-people/lioness-brittany-and-her-black-fleet-pirates-001998
Huh..

It generally takes exceptional people (not saying good or smart or whatever) and men tend to produce more. Men make more retards and geniuses, leaders and tools. Women have a narrow curve more along the middle of the road.

Women are more likely to be average-ish. Men are more likely to [pretty much anything].

Why is killing people and taking over their shit a metric for greatness anyways?

but anyways OP, and all the anons posting here: we know the answer.. Women make shit soldiers and shitier commanders. Thats why modern history forces revisionist memes like Women warriors being anything other than a sign of desperation and glorified cheerleaders like boudicca actually making any strategic decisions

This. Reading through this thread reminded me of 5 office workers trying to explain to the new guy which one of them is Devon.
>Uuuh he has really curl black hair. It's in a big poofy Afro. The one with the vaguely southern accent even though we're in New York? He's always asking if anyone saw the basketball game last night? You know?
Women are shot soldiers. They're smaller, weaker, and way more complicated, what with periods and whatnot. So every society decided to have the larger, stronger, sturdier sex be the soldiers. And when you're looking for a person to lead your army, you are going to pick the 20 year veteran over the potter any day of the week. You guys CANNOT be dumb enough to believe the lack of female military figures isn't predominantly because of this.

>tfw too intelligent for such barbaric behavior

Societies that discourage women from risky professions like warfare produce more children.

Men are physically stronger. While women can use guns with equal proficiency, logistics is also important and men's better endurance and no periods is an advantage.

Behavioral differences are not fully understood but there are differences.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tre.372/pdf

So men tend to become the soldiers in society or any role where force is needed to defend property and rights and thus tend to rise to positions of power.

We are on to something boys! Why do women gravitate to naval professions when it comes to warefare? Is it because it is a lot more strategic and there is less question of individual strength and courage when it comes to leading?

Because killing people and taking over their shit gives you more power and influence. Power and influence is generally what determines greatness because it allows people to make the largest difference in their communities and thus leave a mark. Greatness in a historic sense is how memorable someone is, it doesn't have to be through violence but that seems to be the most efficient way.

Khutulun
Genghis Khan mother commanded some battles
Yeke Khatun
Manduhai

Probs more, can't think of any

> implying women didnt CHOOSE to stay with their children in order to secure a future for their offspring
> they didnt liberate themselves because they were smart enough to wait it out when they could do so without violence
> Men put the burdon of child rearing on women in the first place
> You only think Merkel is shit because you are sexually intimidated by a beautiful woman in power.
> If the foreigners have such a low IQ then you should be able to avoid their vehicles and rapes. Not to mention that its the men that are the problem anyway seeing as women can't rape and don't know how to drive (cuz the men in their country of origin would not teach them how to drive)

Men are masculine and women are feminine, however this doesn't mean one are superior to other, just different, as they each have different societal role to fill
Masculine trait are best for governance, organisation, and war, while feminine trait are best for care and nurturing
The thing is you'll have a mess when this dynamic is mixed up. SJWs for example, show feminine trait like compassion, acceptance, and love and care for others, which are all good trait for mothers but when you'll bring it to politics, will be a disaster, as they will care for even their society enemies, which the masculine would've just quickly dealt with

...
so whos Devon?

>ywn be raped by marauding mongol qts

Because the Navy is more prestigious and technical-skill oriented than the Army. Also, Navy uniforms are fucking secksy af.