I have noticed a statistical dominance of men playing the role of conquering land expansionists. Save for Queen Victoria and Catherine the Great. Is this because men are filled with uncontrollable rage and violence or is it because women are too intelligent and altruistic to do participate in such barbaric behavior?
Why is there no Geng-HER Khan?
Grayson Lee
Cameron Collins
Women are protective, Men are aggressive. Women leaders try to strengthen the homeland, Men try to ensure dominance over others.
Gabriel Sanders
sure, whatever
nice thread, OP, I think you'll get exactly the shitshow you want.
Nicholas Thomas
hello redd8t
Owen Gomez
ITT: violent women? I'm down for that.
Jason Davis
If women are protective wouldnt we see more of them aching to join the military? Aren't mothers supposed to be eager to defend their young?
And are you saying that when women engage in war its to stregthen the homeland but when men do it it is for some machismo type of display?
Connor Rogers
...
Levi Foster
You fool. Genghis Khan and the Mongols liberated women consistently. But they knew the limit. How can you accuse men of barbarism when the biggest conquerors liberated the women much more than your shitty feminist movement? It's simply inability to rule.
Ryan Carter
Testosterone.
Alexander Smith
It this type of indifference that is holding society back and preventing women from being more active in the community. How do you expect any female conquerers to come to power if you refuse to even entertain the notion?