How true is this? I was on Twitter to see cancer data and saw this...

How true is this? I was on Twitter to see cancer data and saw this.Why do people to pretend to know history and think that griffin wasent doing that to feed her typical women ego.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_beheading_Holofernes
youtube.com/watch?v=rd0AdArPjqU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Just blow everything up I'm glad the climates rising fuck you euros and fuck you Semites one day the Semitic regions will be carpet nuked you hopeless sand gobbling twigoids

...

calm down burger.

t.semite

He's actually right the person who posted it was some California black Semitic mongrel

'Countless' is pushing it. All of the ones I can think of off the top of my head (including that painting) are all depicting the same scene. Bitch's name is Judith I think, she seduced some general then murdered him.

What's the context of ops painting?

not a semite but what's the twitter link and what's the significance of the painting with kathy griffith?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_beheading_Holofernes

The difference is the persons head In that painting wasent real.

Kathy Griffin is a piece of shit and deserved to lose her job, plain and simple. And I say that as a somebody who considers himself left-wing and supportive of Bernie Sanders.

No matter what your political affiliation, joking about the assassination of a sitting U.S. President is grossly poor taste. You're not only lowering the discourse by eschewing rational exchange, you're establishing a precedent that this might be "okay" and while the average person knows it's not, there might be somebody just crazy enough to do it. The kind of precedent this might set could potentially shatter America's fragile faith in its public institutions and lead to bitter, lasting conflict.

She is everything that is wrong with liberals in America: they're a bunch of entitled, vain yuppies who worship celebrities and consumer culture.

I'm fine when capitalism punishes conservatives for running their mouth, and I'm fine with capitalism punishing Kathy Griffin for posting some bullshit. If you have a problem with the person in the oval office, there's something you can do about it: get people off their ass to go vote.

How was Holofernes tyrannical
She wasent even alive during that time period.I know it's a meme movie but the film idiocracy is an understatement for the coming genaration

I'm tired of millionaire celebrities blaming me a straight white male. Like seriously fuck you you complete loser they're talentless dicksuckers who know they're godless because most of them unironically worship Devils.

I honestly think it's more an issue of class than race.

Both parties have become completely tailored to supporting billionaires. Even if what they are doing is grossly out of step with their base, these parties still need to be chiefly thinking in terms of "which strategy is going to raise the most money?"
and let's be honest, right-wingers: Trumpcare is a massive fucking tax givaway to those same wealthy coastals that you accuse of being socialists. I too can be honest and call Obamacare a State-sanctioned Monopoly). Republicans sugar daddies are Hydrocarbon and PMCs, Democrats sugar daddies are Lawyers and Celebrities. Wall street donates to both parties, as does AIPAC.

People are frustrated because politics in America have become a game of who's billionaires are going to get their agenda pushed for 4 - 8 years. It's become more a game of who you hate more than who you actually support.

But that still doesn't excuse glamorizing assassination

I disagree but at least you're reasonable what type of leftism do you believe in?I hate all of its facets but if I had to say the best is probably social democratic on the left because at the very least it's grounded in reality

Not him but
I fail to see what there is to disagree with. The us does not have a left wing party. All of your politicians are in somebody's pocket, and are just interested in making themselves more money, no exceptions.

Sorry for the delay.

> what type of leftism do you believe in?
Honestly, I wouldn't pigeonhole myself into a specific ideology because ultimately what I care about are results. IMO Marxism, at least in its orthodox interpretation, is riddled with problems when you try to apply it to real life situations. I would compare Marx's impact on humanities to Sigmund Freud's impact on psychology: the overwhelming majority of what was written was garbage and totally inapplicable to real life, but he got the ball rolling in his field. Before Freud nobody considered someone's mental state as a health issue, and before Marx nobody considered how society arranges labor

if I had to draw a line in the sand I'd call myself left-libertarian. I'm suspicious of too much concentration of political and economic capital, whether in the hands of robber barons or government bureaucrats, and think that a free market can only flourish when there are laws in place preventing either of those scenarios from happening

I think that guns are an American heritage and our martial spirit deserves to be preserved and celebrated, but sensible licensing reform means that we should be making it easier to do it the lawful way and more difficult to do it the unlawful way. Right now the system is prioritized to maximize the profits of gun-makers

I generally think that most economic functions are better left to a free market, but certain things are better provided using a centralized apparatus: military, police, infrastructure, education, and healthcare. I would call it capitalism reinforced with elements of socialism in order to mitigate each other's deleterious effects

There's probably a label for this, I just don't give a shit about the labels. those are tools that divide and categorize us. As long as right-wingers don't go full /pol/ with the insults and ridicule I'm willing to listen to what they have to say, and reminding other left-wingers that alienating them makes us hypocrites

1/2

I would be in favor of an arrangement like where everybody makes a UBI and has government provided healthcare, education, and transportation, but in their jobs (which working-age adults would be required to have in order to draw state benefits) the employer only has to pay a portion of whatever money the worker brings to the company, with progressive taxes on carbon, capital gains, and income, while ending or significantly lowering taxes on corporations and homeowners. The goal of infrastructure spending would be to create new markets that the private sector can capitalize on, and the UBI would allow people to pursue apprenticeships and unpaid gigs in fields which they are genuinely passionate about, and thus bring more value to society than they would as some wagecuck

I support action to combat climate change because I consider it a national security issue, and true energy independence built around renewables is the only thing that'll let us escape the middle east. I don't think the problem is with the religion itself, but is the inevitable consequence of mixing politics with religion, and what Muslims are going through right now is comparable to what Europe went through in the early modern era, when it mixed politics and religion for similar results

I would also point to the three largest metropolitan areas in the country, and note that the one with the most violent crime is also the most heavily segregated, and that when you put children young enough from a bunch of different races in a room together, they'll get along just fine without making any issue of each other's race at all, which is why I tend to believe that race is a social construct, a sort of promoted tribalism meant to sow division within the proletariat by moneyed interests who profit from the discord (which you get on both sides of the aisle) and that by supporting the rights of one we are supporting the rights of all against the machinations of the unscrupulous few

2/2

kathy should have read his book >:)

youtube.com/watch?v=rd0AdArPjqU

Who cares? It's not even that big a deal. Trump's a cunt, and Griffin is a has-been who liberal hypocrites gleefully threw under the bus by gutless mediafucks who behind the scenes were totally agreeing. So much for free speech.

Get over it, pussy.