Should government help the poor?
Should government help the poor?
Only to the extent of preventing full scale civil war. It should try its best to keep welfare to a minimum, because welfare is dysgenic.
Do people choose to be poor?
Do people genuinely decide to just give up and live under their means?
It's usually a combination of low intelligence and bad moral character.
Yes, they do
King Louis should have.
Also Autist Nicky should have too instead of defending Serb terrorists.
Yes. Theres no reason for the poor to exist in the abundance of today.
It's not a black and white issue. Some people choose.
>implying the nobles didn't orchestrate the farce
the poor should sort themselves out
Be careful what you wish for.
Yes.
People have basic rights to water/food/shelter/clothing.
The wealthy have a responsibility to their fellow humans.
Yes, because if we don't, they'll break shit and that costs more money than the handouts would.
Also, it's still easier to integrate poor natives into a society than rich foreigners.
Within reason
Only if the poor are willing to meet the government half way and do something to improve their own lot in life with the government's help.
Going to highschool in a major city I cant tell you how many black girl I knew that got pregnant multiple time in order to "git dem gobment money"
It's mostly a vicious cycle.
Be poor --> don't get educated --> less good job opportunities, more likely to do drugs and crime --> all these things keep you poor --> procreate a lot because you're stupid --> your kids are raised poor and ignorant by stupid parents (at best) --> rinse and repeat
spooky
Sterilization or at least mandatory birth control injects should be given to people on government handouts, but that would not fly with the religious right.
Since when has the government ever helped the poor?
It depends on the country.
The US is a consumer economy so yes, the government should help the poor so as to keep them buying things and spending above their means.
Most wealth is inherited.
It wouldn't fly by anybody because that idea is retarded.
>Most wealth is inherited
t. doesn't understand economics
Oh sweetie
When poor decided to do something about the government.
mmm yes i do love it when middle class nerds start killing poor people and nuns because of their autistic larping
what a preposterous quote, democratic socialism has worked quite well in many countries
No
>be government
>have a steady stream of desperate and distrustful people
>think it's a good idea
they did until they also realized they should've helped the poor
Its not retarded. The single biggest predictor of whether or not a kid will become a criminal is if he is the son of a single mother.
It should give them the means to get out of poverty.
>should the spook be spooked to help the non-spook?
All answers except are pretty spooked
Yes, but with the understanding that only gainful employment can satisfy the human psychological need for self-esteem and creative self-expression. Just dumping money and material goods on people without consideration for their psychological needs is not very helpful.
what's wrong with the people having arms and bread?
Yes obviously
Helping the poor, as in, giving them education, making sure they stay healthy, policing their neighbourhoods and keeping them safe makes for a stronger, fitter, better educated and more peaceful population. With a larger social mobility, so the poor eventually become richer and thus enrich the state.
...