Napoleon was literally Hitler

>Napoleon was literally Hitler

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/CApiU7kvgB8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>tfw you have to bitch slap your homie because he talking too mad shit about something he knows nothing about
youtu.be/CApiU7kvgB8

He was tho

right now we are living the equivalent of the 1848 revolutions but for hitler

>Napoleon was literally Hitler
AKA a good guy. Yes he was. Fuck I cannot think of a single war where Anglos were the good guys perhaps other than when the Normans invaded them.

The first sign someone doesn't know anything about Napoleon.

in the eyes of the liberal every conqueror was Hitler

Jesus Christ, I understand his point, but it's just comedic hyperbole man.

I was actually reading a snippet out of a book by an english author of famous driving figures of European history at a local bookshop. it's from the war years, and the passage I chanced to glance over made a connection of Napoleon and Hitler as having a similar personal evil about them and so forth.

inorite? If I can't dig at the french my internet life won't have any joy in it

>IF YOU'RE GONNA TALK ABOUT HISTORY READ SOME FUCKING HISTORY
>France has kicked ass ever since Charlemagne

Gets angry about people not knowing history, then says Charlemagne was french. Good one.

a common mistake

He was better than any fractious concept of french or german

didn't he say that England won the 100 years' war?

are we talking about Napoleon III or the original?

he did

>Zama didn't happen
>Pikemen didn't fight eachother
>Metric is gay
>Boers dying in camps isn't Britains fault
>Cavalry was useless
>France is shit at everything

don't forget
>torches, throwing knives and bracelets are hollywood memes
>3 men could hold a medieval castle
>no one used axes in warfare

He was more French than German. Modern France certainly was formed to a greater part by the Carolingians than modern Germany.

3,4, and 6 are bang on

>torches etc. etc. etc. are memes

to the extent they're shown in hollywood, absolutely

>three men, castle, etc.

I'll chalk that up to foreigners not understanding hyperbole

>no one used axes in warfare

he didn't say this

He was a conquerer, so he obviously wasn't that great of a guy, but it's my personal philosophy that we shouldn't judge the quality of character of historical figures, unless they're unforgivable and kill innocents (Hitler, Stalin) or absolutely saintly (Gandhi).

I'm not going to claim Napoleon was a great guy, but he's the pope compared to Hitler.

>I don't judge people unless I decide to judge them

>Since Charlemagne
Stopped watching and disregarded everything

Exceptions to the rule, though I can get how it seems hypocritical.

why?