Shia Islam vs Sunni Islam

Which do you think is better? How would you improve one or the other?

pls no shitposting and no insults

No shi'ite ever crashed a plane into my office.

Isn't the only difference who they believe succeeded Muhammed?

Honestly, I don't give a fuck.

Sufism

Tbh Sunni islam is very straight forward. Fundamental difference is the infallibility of the imams, which contested.

So, I guess your answer is Sunni Islam, since virtually all Sufis are Sunnis?

>My opinion (OP):
I think Shia Islam is the most intellectual faith of the two, because it questions the early history of Islam with a lot of criticism. The first caliphates shaped the theology, building upon what was introduced by Muhamad, Shia Islam questions this period where political motives were clashing with religious motives, judging every decision to be man-made and thus invalidating them.

However, Sunni faith recognizes that early caliphates were very beneficial for Islam, if muhamad was the prophet and whatnot, he's only the first half of the equation. Although Sunni Islam doesn't question the early caliphs and their motivations, their position about Islam history is the most realistic.

To improve them, I'd say Shias should open up to the first caliphs who were defending the same cause. And Sunnis need to stop seeing the 4 rightly-guided caliphs as saints who did no wrong.

Sufism is a practice, not a belief system and neither is it any useful in jurisprudence.

They're both absolute garbage tier. Shia has a better chance of being reformed since it's so extra-textual and has so much ludicrous mysticism and retarded mythologising that are crying out for ridicule, Sunnis are more like Protestants they stick to just the core text and maybe a few "commentaries", this makes their beliefs much more anti-fragile and also makes reform much more difficult.

>Sunnis are protestants. Kek