Overall was the sexual revolution better of worse for society?

Worse.

>destruction of family unit
>environmental pollution (women on the pill poisoning the water with their piss and shit)
>no sense of loyalty and affection, just basic instincts
>social instability on the most micro level

in what way has the family unit been destroyed

Is it really the sexual revolution that is to blame for /r9k/? I personally believe that rampart capitalism sold the vapid lifestyle and "SEX! SEX! SEX!" idea to people.

Just my own opinion and not presenting it as fact.

>which is the natural situaiton in the first place
I agree with you. And this is why we need to overcome nature and find that one Prometheus who will pry reproduction away from women and finally liberate men from them.

t. r9cuck

Look at how divorce rates and single motherhood rates spiked up since the 1960s. You can't expect a semblance of social cohesion when it's an accepted norm to treat your romantic partners like hot dog vendors.

Divorce rates have completely exploded all over the Western World, the nuclear family has become a minority, the father figure has completely disappeared in the modern world, and the Black family has been destroyed.

Women don't want to be mothers and have turned into absolute degenerates. It's all really unfortunate. It wouldn't be so bad at the end of day, but these very same women are welcoming the third world with open arms to come out and outbreed us and exploit our generous welfare states.

It's pretty sickening overall.

Oh please these guys worship women, misogynist are men who have dealt with women only virgins babies idolize women because it shows they have no experience with them at all.

divorce rates have been falling since the 1980s though

Nothing you said is true.

We just have more freedom.

Better for the individual, society i don't know.
Fuck society.

It destroyed any kind of order in society.

>Nothing you said is true.
livescience.com/20532-birth-control-water-pollution.html

What's so bad about that? Why do you need this order?

t.woman

Your gender are liars who distort information to get your way all the time.

>literally the mind of a woman.

I'm sure things like AGW are more dangerous to environment than women and their pills. But you don't complain about it. In fact, you probably don't believe in it.

t. American

time.com/4575495/divorce-rate-nearly-40-year-low/

yes I was referring to America alone, sorry should have specified

>literal whataboutism out of nowhere

I'm a man, but I'm curious why you need this order.

Good goy, you still don't realize the sexual revolution was pushed as a way into the monetization of human instincts. The next big industry will be the commercialization of air, so make sure to invest in oxygen before it's too late.

There are other places in the world than your 3rd world country, Jose.

>I'm sure things like AGW are more dangerous to environment than women and their pills.

goalpost shifting, he never said the impact was fucking worse than global warming.

>monetization of human instincts
It's far deeper than that. It's not just some jew pushing this to make a quick buck, it's a literal destruction of civilization.

Of course, because people aren't even getting married nowdays.

It's a lot better to measure single parentship, and you'll see at least 50% of people live in broken families.

got a source on that stat?

Our civilization is doing pretty well.

Order is what made us what we are user, if you like chaos feel free to go Africa and stay there with other chaos loving humans.

It made civilization become less civilized. The difference between a civilized man and the savage is that the savage is unable to control his basic urges and instincts. It effectively set mankind 10,000 years back.

Are you referring to western civilization? Because that one is literally drowning right now.

what utter nonsense

I don't think they had computers and internet 10,000 years ago.

>materialist brainlet pipes up
About time.

Which individual? As far as i know, it only has filled me with disgust.

You will never understand, lowly beasts such as yourself lack the empathy to imagine a world where people suffer the least, and strive towards it. All you can do is excuse yourself with "Impossible things are not worth trying to approximate to, and must be avoided in all ways possible!". In the end, you're just looking for excuses to defend your self-indulgement.

>As far as i know, it only has filled me with disgust.
Filling you with disgust is a small price to pay for much more concrete freedoms.

Those old societies also started two most devastating wars in human history. And you can always move to some Asian country, they are very patriarchal, have the highest suicide rates and in general are some of the least happy people on Earth.

>reduce the native birth rate to nothing and pollute the fuck out of the environment just so you can whore around some more without having to commit
Women, everyone. Literally sociopaths: the sex.

It's an estimation. The question was asked to my class during a pediatrics lecture about child abuse, half the class rose their arms. It really wouldn't surprise me if actual statistics backed that up.

What is it about Italy that keeps the divorce rates low?

Mutligenerational households and Catholic culture.

But you know that men generally have more partners than women? They also cheat more often.

Why do you think freedom is a good thing? Freedom just means lack of consequences for harming others.

>devastating
Yh for Europeans, Europeans are not humanity thus its no devastating to the species entirely.

There would be more war in Europe if white people were naturally chaotic dumbass.

Asians commit suicide due to the meritocratic culture of theres where if your a moron you are less than shit and moron is any one who scores under an A-.

>men generally have more partners than women
Nope.

I'd say that thus far it has been worse although more time would be needed to say for certain. It very clearly has altered government policy due to the dramatic reduction in birthrates which has played a huge factor in mass immigration and our currently unstable welfare programs.

>Well if someone popular does it then its fine
Ah yes the female behavior of being unable to think for yourself at all.

The problem has never been which gender's promiscuity is more detrimental to society. The problem has always been promiscuity itself, although the consequences of female promiscuity are more severe in any case. Still, this shouldn't take the problem out of scope, it all started because promiscuity wasn't regulated enough in the case of men.

>"fuck Society imma be me and the world will just have to deal!!"
>probably hasn't made their own food
>probably hasn't made their own clothes
>probably hasn't had to build home defenses to keep out criminals
>probably blindly takes for granted civil servants, community protections (police), and the ability of society to let people specialize in a certain way to produce the essentials of life that allow us to live as we do
>"st...still society is dumb i can do all these things..."

Even more? Because Europeans were murdering each other all the time before 1945.

It's kind of crazy. In our grandparents' time, adultery was literally a felony you could get fined or even jailed for. Now it's not only legal, it's expected.

All races were murdering each other.

Women are rotten to the core since birth, if you're not MGTOW you're basically a retard.

So? Why do you think white Europeans are naturally not chaotic?

>Europeans
No retard those are wars, the murder rate in white majority areas shows how most whites are naturally orderly and peaceful.

Blacks however have very high murder rates no matter what they exist showing that blacks are the naturally chaotic humans retard.

I believe all races are naturally chaotic, as nature itself is chaotic, and nature itself is evil. The sexual revolution wasn't really progress, it was regress, people climbing back on the trees and becoming monkeys again.

Was it always the same? What about murder rates in 1920s or 1930s? Or even earlier.

As i said, it wasn't regulated enough. References to adultery keep popping up in old literature, it is obvious it's always been a part of the young male's culture, and an evil that would have been best to erase when it was possible. Sadly that chance is long gone, and you can only wonder where will this dystopia take us.

So authoritarian rule and ridiculous norms are progressive?

Adultery always existed the same way murder and theft has always existed. It's our attitude towards it that changed.

The only chaotic races are Blacks, Abos and Amazon Amerindians, All other races are orderly thats why these RACES HAD CIVILIZATION NOT THEM.
Whites have always had low crime in American history, the rampant crime in America is alien to how it was originally and the very disturbing part is that fact that the natives dont even have the most dangerous places in America its the fucking blacks.

I like people being free to practice their sexuality as they please. People not being judged by private acts is always good.

What I don't like is propaganda about how sex is the greatest thing and you should have lots of it all the time with different people. I don't like sexualization culture.

Ultimately I'm still glad it happened because now that people freely speak about their sexual lives, I can filter out all the scum and go for the kind of people that I like.

This would be progressive: Nothing would advance mankind as much as getting rid of women.

>All other races are orderly thats why these RACES HAD CIVILIZATION NOT THEM.
And it has nothing to do with nature. Whites are orderly because they overcame nature, not because they adhered to it.

catholicism and a culture where cheaters get a good beating

And it changed for the worse. Instead of putting out the fire, they threw more fuel into it, hoping the flame would extinguish itself. Now the whole building will collapse.

worse for our generation, but good for those we will teach

we actually have a very conscientious generation coming up, raised directly against the excesses of the 20th century.

Condoms help prevent a lot of that.

Why even make a post?

It's good because it ended dysgenic arranged marriages where subhuman introvert betas were simply handed a right to reproduction.

I think the individual is more important, doesn't mean society is worthless.
I just didn't feel like giving an elaborate answer

Whites never overcame nature, nature is the reason whites are orderl in the first place stupid.

The DNA of whites is why we are orderly.

Why do you? It's a statistical reality and an accepted fact that a woman has more partners than a man in life. In fact, a significant percentage of men doesn't have any sex whatsoever.

Condoms wouldn't be needed, and thus the risk of disease, unwanted pregnancies and the psychological instability those kind of relationships bring to groups if people would simply masturbate and reserve sex for reproduction.

A brave new world, isn't it.

That makes no sense. Genetics don't determine how a race will behave.

It didn't really. Chad isn't passing his genes thanks to birth control pills and abortions.

There is literally no silver lining in this.

You're a literal fucktard. American I presume as well. There is nothing natural about laws, order, civilization or reason. Stop equating "natural" and "good", nature is fucking evil.

Arranged marriage had nothing to do with love user, human males recognized that women are attracted to uncivilized savages and if given their own will they would sleep with the criminals rather than them, hence arranged marriage was made to stop a woman from wasting his reproductive potential by creating a menace to society.

LIKE WHAT WE SEE TODAY WITH WHITE FEMALES BREEDING WITH UNCIVLIZED BLACK MALES/HISPANIC MALES AND EVEN THUGGISH WHITE MALES WHO ABANDON THEM LEAVING BEHIND A CRIMINAL SPAWN WHO IF MALE WILL COURT A WHITE FEMALE TO CONTINUE THIS THUG CYCLE ALL OVER AGAIN.

Why are you thinking the history started after 1960s?
>Whites have always had low crime in American history
Well, according to some studies it was higher in 1910s-1940s than today.

>men have more partners then women

Only even possible if you count the gay community, in which case all bets are off.

What about getting rid of people wasting their life on Veeky Forums?

I was just wondering why you would even make a post if all you were going to say was "Nope" in response to what he said

Whites are intelligent orderly creatures thus they make laws in their tribes to live by,

Civilizations are nothing more than gigantic more organized tribes you stupid fuck.

EVERY THING WE DO IS OUR NATURAL BEHAVIOR DUMBASS.

Men are literal niggers and slaves of women, Chads are literally just house niggers, not some alpha dogs ruling society. They unironically measure their worth in how much female attention they can get, much like the house nigger measured his worth in how much his master praised him. If we doesn't realize we are enslaved and cucked by women, we will never free ourselves.

It seems to have completely gone out of control. I read articles where some prof was literally advocating to just cheat on your partner but simply not tell him and that those lies are ok. It's completely fucked up

Go back to plebbit you abominable cretin, I have no time for you.

Well it's here so what else can you do? Use condoms for protection unless you want pregnancy then go at it.