US "Civil War"

>US "Civil War"
>it's actually a failed nationalist revolution

>tfw a literal aristocracy of dixie krauts tried to literally seize the means of production

Also known as slavery.

why didn't Frederick's brother became king of America

Since when was a revolution not a civil war when it involves armies?

The US war of Independence was also a civil war

This true, OP you are a certifiable moron.

>american "Independence"
>it's just britbongs doing stealth imperialism

>World War 2
>no fighting in the Americas and most of Africa

>English "civil war"
>actually a successful puritan revolution

>Boxer rebellion
>none of them are trained boxers

>Spanish Civil War
>Spanish
>Civil

>american
>civil
>war

>USA
>Nation

>War of 1812
>Went for 3 years

>world war 2
>7 years war was on more continents

made me kek

>War of 1812
>There were multiple wars that year

>100 Years war
>116 Years
>Multiple armistices in between

They were? The rebellion was founded by a martial arts society, and that society's name was "Society of the Righteous and Harmonious Fists."

It was from a time before Chinese martial arts was corrupted by LE ACROBATIC KUNG FU memes perpetrated by circuses and movies, and just looked like plain kickboxing to many foreign observers.

>dixie krauts
>krauts
Are you retarded? Northerners were the krauts.

I'd argue it was a rebellion, if theres a difference in your mind that is.

I'd say the independence war wasn't even a revolution. They didn't aim to overthrow the king in London, they just wanted to secede.

>failed nationalist revolution
You mean successful imposition of nationalism over particularism.

Independence war wasn't a civil war idiot.