Why is the Reichstag fire the only historically accepted proof of a false flag happening...

Why is the Reichstag fire the only historically accepted proof of a false flag happening? Every other false flags in history seems to be either "alleged" or dismissed as "conspiracy theories".

>Every other false flags in history seems to be either "alleged" or dismissed as "conspiracy theories".

from top of my head
>Soviet attack on Finland
>Japanese attack on China
>German attack on Poland
Are examples of false flags from this era. Not to mention the Reichstag fire is not universally accepted to be a false flag

OP confirmed for idiot again

SHUT IT DOWN

>Soviet attack on Finland
>Japanese attack on China
>German attack on Poland

2/3 were false flags done by Le evil axis. We don't engage in conspiracy goyim.

But Van Der Lubbe did light it so how is it a false flag? The NSDAP just used it for its full political value

What are you trying to convey, you crossboarding retard?

>Axis act like scummiest shit in the history of existance
>waaah waaah why is everyone so mean to the Nazis?

>Gulf of Tonkin Incident
>Sinking of the RMS Lusitania (Not really a false flag, but the German embassy warned Americans via newspaper announcements that they would sink the ship, since it had ammunitions on board. The US sent it over the pond anyway and used the incident as an excuse to enter the war)
>Attack on Pearl Harbor (not a false flag; made out to be a sneaky surprise attack when there was information about it several weeks before the Japanese fleet struck. Another great excuse to enter a war)
>Nero burning Rome

Because everytime someone claims a false flag by (((ZE JEWS))) they're easily disproven by someone who knows what he's talking about?

It's not historically accepted.

fpbp

>Attack on Pearl Harbor (not a false flag; made out to be a sneaky surprise attack when there was information about it several weeks before the Japanese fleet struck. Another great excuse to enter a war)

>Hey Jimbo, how do we start a war against those dity Japs?
>I don't know, Dick, but according to my intel Japs are planning a surprise attack against us. How about we do nothing and let them strike?
>But Jimbo, wouldn't it cause significant damage?
>Yes, but it'll start the war.
>Jimbo, you a genius!

Zimmermann telegram comes to mind.

The US did not know the Japanese were going to attack Pearl. Yes, they had SIGINT intercepts showing it, but those intercepts were never translated or analysed until after the war because the USN didnt have enough intel staff and translators to work through their backlog.

>USA knows that Japan is going to attack Pearl Harbor
>they can prepare their defenses, shoot down most of the Japanese planes with minimal losses, and still have most of their navy intact
>instead they choose to purposely leave their defenses unprepared and most of their battleship fleet is sunk
Do you know how retarded this conspiracy theory makes you sound?

>Pearl Harbor
It's more like they didn't take it seriously than actively allowed it to happen

>what is using an event as propaganda to pursue the masses into agreeing with the government decision?

Reichsrag fire was done by some anarchist or communist.

>Japan declares war on USA and bombs Pearl Harbor
"No guys, we're just gonna let Japan keep bombing us, there is absolutely no need to declare war and fight back against Japan."

Maine

>move the Pacific Fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor mere months before the attack, within striking distance of Japanese carrier aircraft
>don't have the aircraft carriers present in port on the week of the bombing

Hmmmm.......

This was not a false flag

Yes FDR planned it all out ahead of time, he also turned the fricking frogs gay

Everything went the way FDR had hoped. He even got more than he hoped for by Hitler being a fucking retard and declaring war on the US first.

The only thing that went FDRs way was WW2 and the lend lease industry making his New Deal not an absolutely abysmal failure

As far as I'm aware, the mainstream opinion is that it really was a coincidence, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. Maybe they say it otherwise in school, but school history is mostly make belief anyway.

So then why didn't they prepare the defenses then? Surely if you've set up bait for Japan to attack then you might as well make sure that the battleships escape unscathed and you shoot down as many of their planes as possible?

If you thought about it for one second, you'd realize that preparing defenses would imply that the government knew about the attack and instead of preventing a war, just let it happen. With the strike being so successful, nobody would suspect that it was intentional. They knew that Japan could never win the war, even if they sank the entire US fleet, and the harder they hit, the less willing the American people would be to accept a peace treaty that didn't see Japan BTFO forever.

The whole thing was a plot to push the boundary of US military power onto the Asian continent. They didn't predict the victory of the Chinese communists, they thought they would end up with a US Korea and Japan and a friendly disorganized corrupt China open for American companies to exploit.

>The whole thing was a plot to push the boundary of US military power onto the Asian continent
They already did that in the Spanish-American War dumb dumb

We all saw how the Philippines foothold did against a regional power.

>they used it as an excuse to enter the war
>2 years later

Nero didn't burn Rome you tard.
A fire happened and he did shit all to help.

Well, something being "alleged" doesn't mean it didn't happen, just that there is insufficient evidence to assert it with certainty.