Why don't people specifically blame Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry for slavery in the USA...

Why don't people specifically blame Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry for slavery in the USA? Arguably no other ancestries in the USA owned slaves.

Anyone who blames a specific race for the entirety of slavery is a slobbering historically illiterate retard

you forgot jews

Because to a liberal the world can only be categorized in broad, simple terms. Anything else hurts their heads.

collectivism is cancer to soceity

It really goes both ways honestly. The right fetishisizes europe as from romantic pan european idea disregarding the cultural diversity and differences between european people. They also think of africa like a country like afro centrists. The right also thinks mexico= all of latin america. Americans are just dumb in general.

>Insert question here
>RIGHT/LEFT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>Americans so dumb guys
right
ok

Americans categorise Europeans as "white" first instead of their individual ethnicities.

And """""white""""" people instituted slavery. So it doesn't matter if you're a shetlandic sheep-herd who arrived here in 1989 or whatever, since you are """"""white"""""" you are responsible.

wouldn't it make more sense to blame slave owners, traders, and enablers for slavery in the USA?

>Why don't people specifically blame Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry for slavery in the USA?
Because that includes African-Americans themselves, so it's easier to say 'white people' as it negates this inconvenient truth.

yes, and those were Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry.

I was just saying both do it. Your post doesn't add anything.

>Arguably no other ancestries in the USA owned slaves.
You forgot someone, OP.

except that description is unnecessarily broad. why bother being more specific than "white people" if the level of discourse you're promoting isn't any more sophisticated?

>ideology has no irl implications
>I'm so above it all lol
Say what you will, but in my life experience people most eager to use a Black/White or Red/White dichotomy for early American history have been politically motivated.

because anyone with mediterranean, middle eastern, slavic ancestry have no responsibility for it. you are mentally challenged or something.

Trips of truth

>when you find out your Puritan ancestors owned slaves

GIBE MONEY

>Meditteranean
Ever heard of Spain and Portugal?

because you can milk more retards with white guilt that way.

Rhode Island Jews basically ran the Yankee slave trade.

Sephardi and Dutch jews were involved the most.

>Portugal
>Mediterranean

Spotted the amerifat