>post-modernism
>feminism
>Mudcentricism (we wuz kangz)
>All Marxism
And so on.
>post-modernism
>feminism
>Mudcentricism (we wuz kangz)
>All Marxism
And so on.
Other urls found in this thread:
Marx and Nietzsche are also shit.
>>post-modernism
>>feminism
>>Mudcentricism (we wuz kangz)
>>All Marxism
That's pretty much all Jewish "philosophy" (sophistry). That's what they excel at - falsehood.
Yeah, but West Philo went far downhill after them.
>pol
Well what do we define economics as? What about psychology or deconstructionalism? I doubt you're a Nazi but you're clearly not well read. Perhaps you should start with something light like the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy.
Post-Modernism starts with Kant's refutation of pure reason and Hume's critique of empiricism which essentially debunked the pure rationalism of the enlightenment. Subjectivity rests on a so-far irrefutable philosophical foundation.
Western Philosophy has been shit for a much longer time than that. If anything, Nietzsche was superior to what preceded him.
Aquinas was the last great philosopher.
Shouldn't you be at Gender Studies?
Yeah man, We Wuz Kangz cause subjectivity so you can ignore all evidence. Also you're healthy at every size.
...
maybe the analytic tradition is your style
This is flatly stupid. You present Kant as virtually the opposite of what he is.
The poison in the well is Hegel.
What the fuck did you mean by this?
Kant's critique essentially showed that it was impossible to come to know reality by reason alone and that reason itself was innately contradictory and irrational.
The point I was making with my post is that you're out of your depth trying to criticize post-modernism without understanding why and how it came to be the dominant philosophical school of thought.
>Husserl
>Bergson
>Weber
>Adorno (inb4 da evil marxist joos)
>Walter Benjamin
>Wittgenstein
>Heidegger
>Popper
>Derrida
>shit
Absolutely wrong. Who taught you that nonsense?
"Critique" in the Kantian sense is far removed from the postmodern definition.
Correct. Every one of those is shit.
>defending post-modernism
HEALTHY AT EVERY SIZE
>shitting on Witty
Say that to my face fucker, not online and see what happens.
He was a mentally unstable spiritually autistic dipshit. Have you even read Tractatus? Fucking ludicrous.
>Kant insists that “metaphysics is utterly impossible, or at best a disorderly and bungling endeavor” if we do not separate “ideas of reason” from “concepts of the understanding”
Kant's work on Reason is the foundation of the irrationalism that came to characterize continental philosophy in his wake. Hegel, Schopenhaur and Nietzsche were all irrationalists following in Kant's work.
this. it is literally the basis that framed the gradual analytic/continental split
You mean post-Hegel.
BINGO
Check out friesian.com my friend, ignore 90s layout, content is exceptional.
Dude, you do realise the vast majority of po-mos are anti-Marxist? They've been shitting on each other for about 4 decades straight
They don't. The spergs in this thread refuse to read anything later than 18th century aside from angry Amazon reviews, and throw literally every writer afterward in the same bucket.
Start at The Project of the Friesian School
They're all filthy fucking relativists.
Are you unable to read your own quotation? Kant correctly states that, in order to have a coherent metaphysics, one must separate ideas of reason from concepts of the understanding.
Kant is not a relativist in the least.
You are both right/wrong.
1. Kant is not a relativist or "irrationalist"
2. Continental/analytic divide did start with Kant.
Postmodernism is inherently incompatible with Marxism. Afrocentrism is not Western.
What kind of asinine shit is this?
Western Philosophy went downhill after Descartes. Nietzsche was a notable exception.
>Afrocentrism is not Western.
>pretending We Wuz Kangz isn't a New World habit
Nobody said the Egyptians or Olmecs were Nignogs before Amerifats did.
Go back to /pol/