The HRE test - What it should be called - And does your country pass it?

What should the "HRE test" be called?

I'm talking about the test which questions the validity of an entity's official name, for example:
---
>Holy
>Roman
>Empire
---

I personally like the term "three chevron test". What other names would you give it? "Voltaireposting" always works, but it sounds memey.

Onto another question - what country are you from and how does it perform on the test?

> Commonwealth
> of Australia

Commonwealth (n.) - a state formed for the common good -

Australia (n.) - the continent Australia

I think Australia succeeds the test on a moderate level at least, given it's fourth on inequality adjusted HDI and it covers what people think is the continent of Australia.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonians_(ethnic_group)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>united
check, at least under the same government with federal laws
>states
check
>of america
of a big chunk of north america at least
eh

>United
Politically yes, but socially no.

>democratic
No
>people's
Lol nope again
>republic
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch
Big no
>of Korea
It's on the Korean peninsula, so that fits
1/4, no bueno

>your country
Nice larping

Sh...sh...shut up! Praise the Supreme Leader!

>State
Yup
>Of
Idk sure
>Florida
Yup

Well since the states that are united are political entities...

>United
>States
>of America
Well, we are a bunch of states united into one country on the continent of North America, so it's pretty good, though we don't cover all of the Americas.

Honestly, a lot of these are much worse than others. Fucking Ohio versus South Dakota.

>Republic
Yes
>Indonesia
It's derived from greek language Indós and nèsos meaning "Indian Islands" so yeah it's fits.

>Minnesota
>Tornados
Wtf? Texas or Oklahoma or Missouri has to be worse by any metric even adjusting for population or something

G*rman detected.

We don't need to be. Only 'people' who can't grasp individuality need to be socially unified. And you'll find we are socially unified where it matters. Love of freedom.

I love 'the three cevron test'

Will meme it on other boards from now on.

Hyperautists out.

>Veeky Forums
>History
>& Humanities
Well, Veeky Forums is what you add to the website name to get here, and we d have a mild sprinkling of history and a fat load of humanities, so, I'd say it's generally accurate.

>Kingdom
Checked
>of Sweden
It doesn't just include swedes (svear) anymore but geographically everything between geats in the west, skanes in the south, sami in the north and gotlanders in the east. Still a check though as all of them have come to think of themselved as swedes.

>three
>chevron
>test

>Claims to have love of freedom.
>Still lives in the USA.

>Republic
It is a representative republic.
>of Finland
A country full of Finns who speak Finnish in a nation standing on Fenno part of Fennoscandia.

>Italian
The territory of the country encompasses almost all the ethnic Italian populations in Europe. Italians are by large the majoritary ethnic group in the country
>Republic
It's a parliamentary republic as defined in the constitution.

>Federal
>Republic
>Of Germany

This is very difficult to say while keeping a straight face. I wonder who can, because indeed it is hard.

"Federal", you say, while grinning like Merkel did. "Federal", it is its name. But then, thinking of "Federal", you think about all the states which have no freedom to act how they want. You think about all those who tried to fuck with the states. You think about the chokehold Berlin has on the country and how their political sphere is dominated by the "Federal" government.

But then, the funniest is coming: "Republic". Yes, now, you cannot contain your laughter. "Republic", it is called despite the fact that this "Republican" body has frequent stifling of freedom of speech and basic rights, a "Republic" so rife with corruption that the former communist states of Europe refused to copy it. An authoritarian regime and a nanny state, yes, but still calling themselves "Republican".

And now, here is the end of the fun: "Germany". Now you fell on the ground, laughing so hard that you cannot breathe. "Germany", a body made of states of former petty duchies and counties, a country which lost its important Eastern German lands, now full of Turks and Polish guest workers. A "German" country which will have no ethnic Germans left living on its soil by the end of the century.

>Federal
>Republic
>Of Germany

>
>
>

>State
>of
>Israel

Yup

They call themselves Joseon after Kingdom of Joseon, so probably not even the fourth one.

European
>Union

It`s not really a Union, since that would mean the countrys would cooperate with each other wich they don`t do, but this might change since the crazy Island people left it.

>he wants a Brussels-led lobbying corruption fest to lead the continent

t. American

Half the judgements have been too lenient, not in the trichevronian spirit

I am at least happy that the crazy commies in my country hate the EU

Kingdom
>Check, we do have a King.

Of the Netherlands
>Doesn't own all of the Netherlands but is located in the Netherlands.
We're about half way there.

Previously:
>The Republic
Check, there was no monarch in power, most of the power was in the hand of the citizens.

>Of the 7 united
Semi-check? There were offcially 7 Dutch provinces that started the Republic working together politically, but in reality there were 2 more provinces directly governed by the States-General.

On another note, Australia isn't a continent, Oceania is. Australia comes from the term "Terra Australis", which means southern land. There is however a larger more southern land, Antartica.

>Forgot the last part of my seven united netherlands post.

>Netherlands
Again, located in the Netherlands, but only owned avout half of the Netherlands.

>Kingdom
Constitutional monarchy so the power of the royal house is debatable. I'll give it a half

>of Denmark
Located on the Danish isles, definitely correct.

Why not just call it the "HRE test" or the "Voltair test". It's descriptive and rolls of the tongue.

Why not just call it the "HRE test" or the "Voltair test"? It's descriptive and rolls of the tongue.

I wanna roll you off my tongue user desu

>Kingdom
Fair enough, we have Felipe
>of
Just filling
>Spain
It occupies most of Hispania, traditionally considered distinct from Portugal. 10/10

Does the king of Spain get much love? I know Spain still has their monarchy since they didn't go full France on them, but are they as loved as the British royalty?

>Federal
no, it is more centralist than federalist
>presidential
we have a president, check
>constitutional
we have a constitution, check
>republic
check
>of Argentina
it is Argentina

>Republic
Of
>Ireland

t. Juncker

Not remotely. Much of the left is republican.

>United

For the moment, yes, though devolution and referendums are becoming more and more accepted as parts of the political process, so perhaps not for much longer.

>Kingdom

Yes, thankfully. Fuck republicanism.

>Of

Yes.

>Great

If by great you mean the nation comprising the largest of the British Isles, then yes, for the moment, this is still true, at least until Scotland becomes independent. And of course if you mean great in terms of quality then yes we're still pretty cool, fuck the continentals.

>Britain

Still controlling the vast majority of the British Isles does largely entitle us to this claim, particularly as related to 'Great Britain', which we still entirely control as a unified state.

>And

Yes, this too.

>Northern

By and large, yes.

>Ireland

This is a contentious one, but as relating to 'Northern Ireland', yes we still control the six counties, though of course that doesn't comprise all of the north of the island of Ireland, but at least the majority enough to claim a nation's name from it.

All in all, I think we live up to our name.

Scotland will never leave.

>Canada
Sure?

Fucking wish they would socialist cunts

>Autonomous
Stupid addition that is so ironic now
>Republic
More like oligarchy
>of Crimea
sure
2,5/3

>Dominion
>of
>Canada

a much cooler, much more sinister name. Should have stuck with it, then we could really own our colonialism

>Kingdom
>Of Sweden
The Monarch is the head of state and Sweden is the nation, region, and polity. It passes the test; Does your country?

>Republic
Check
>of Macedonia
Check, kind of. When we unite with our Macedonian brothers we will pass the test.

Call it a 'name analysis' or something similar. Names are best left as plain as is viable.

>>of Macedonia
>Check, kind of.
Not at all. You aren't in Macedonia. You aren't Macedonian. You're Bulgarians directly north of Macedon, which is a Greek region full of Greeks, and the home of Alexander.

Is that why the government can force me to make cakes for faggots? And tell me I have no right to self Defence?

that is not the definition of a republic.

us nerds amirite
also Idaho and Oklahoma did absolutely nothing wrong

Closer to the truth is that these Bulgarians speak a form of Macedonian, and not the other way around. Ancient Greeks considered Ancient Macedonians inferior, lower class, barbarians and so forth, they never saw Macedonians as Greeks and that is Greece Achilles heel. There is evidence of it in writing and it could be used by locals to separate them selves from Greece. The ancient claim on Macedonia as being Greek is complete bullshit. For about 3400 years there were Greek people but not a unified Greek kingdom or Republic of any kind. Greeks weren't called Greeks because of the country they came from but the region.

Just because Macedonians were considered a different group of Greeks than most Greeks, doesn't mean they weren't Greek, ethnically, linguistically, and religiously.
And the people of the FYROM are, in no way, shape, or form, related to the people of Alexander's Macedon.

>the people of the Macedonia are, in no way, shape, or form, related to the people of Alexander's Macedon.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonians_(ethnic_group)

Learn something. You are obviously a foreigner to Macedonia and Macedonians, and it's clear you have a political agenda. There is physically no such thing as Slavic blood. Just because we may speak a Slavic language doesn't change that we've always been Macedonians ethnically. Are you gonna tell me Palestinians are just Arabs because they speak Arabic? No, they are indigenous to Palestine, they just have changed linguistically.

>And tell me I have no right to self Defence?
You do have a right to self defence you colossal retard.

really triggers my neurons

>República

it's a republic, all right. the current composition of congress is technically no constitutional, but we have 3 working powers

>Argentina

Save for one rebel province known as u r gay, yes

Fuck off with that whitewashed map

Are Thracian Turks Macedonian now too?

>United
Relations between Westminster and certain devolved parliaments are rocky.
>Kingdom
Barely. "Constitutional" monarchy means that the royal family holds no power.

>Barely. "Constitutional" monarchy means that the royal family holds no power.

Actually it holds all the power, it just doesn't execute that power for the most part. But every act of the British Parliament is backed by the ultimate authority of the monarch.

FYROMians speak a Western Bulgarian dialect.
The ""Macedonian"" language was created in 1944.
Before the 19th century, they considered themselves as Bulgarian.


The difference between the FYROMians and Bulgarians is smaller than between Croats and Serbs, although Croatian and Serbian are both based on the same dialect (Štokavian).

kek this pasta is fresh

>Are you gonna tell me Palestinians are just Arabs

Yes, I actually will tell you that. You are a Slav, in the same way they are Arabs.

>Before the 19th century, they considered themselves as Bulgarian.

WRONG.

Bulgarians speak a form of Macedonian, not the other way around. The modern meaning of Bulgarian was merely to denote church affiliation, just as greek was. Hence the overnight bulgarization/hellinization of the Macedonian people in the 19th century.

>Argentinian
Comes from Latin for silver. No silver fucking nowhere.

>Federal
Every province hates the others around and manage themselves, so yea.

>Republic
Weakass popularity contest where every retard can decide who will not represent him. Checked.

2/3 seem good.

>Republic
Yes
>of Poland
Well it lack 2 important Polish city, Lwów and Wilno

Vilnius and Lviv haven't been Polish for over 50 years.

>Italian
We don't own all of Italy but at least most of it
>Republic
Yes

The Spanish left is the most disgusting of all of the world's lefts. Franco was a complete pussy for playing olive branch politics with them after the war

>Swiss
Been owning the same piece of land with no border losses for 150 years, and there is no serious separatist movement, people consider themselves swiss and are largely native
>Confederation
Check

Yes and before WWI Warsaw and Gdansk haven't been Polish for over 123 years