Are the iberian peninsula inhabitants iberians, celts, romans, moors, or germanic? Or at least releated to any of those groups?
Pic kinda unreleated
Are the iberian peninsula inhabitants iberians, celts, romans, moors, or germanic? Or at least releated to any of those groups?
Pic kinda unreleated
Other urls found in this thread:
biorxiv.org
twitter.com
>2017
>using the word moors
A mix of all of that anyway but mostly iberians, and probably no significan roman admixture.
we still call people from north africa moors, even in school they call them muslims/moors.
Also the iberians/celts of the peninsula were heavily romaniced
When the Romans came they established colonies throughout Spain and eventually assimilated the Iberians and the celts. The goths contributed little to the genetics of the population since they were just the ruling elite. When the mudslimes invaded they destroyed some cities like Valencia and rebuilt it with mudslime colonists. Portugal was colonized by Berber mudlsimes. After the reconquest the moors of Aragon, Valencia were allowed to remain while the andalucians and portugalese moors were expelled to either Granada or morocco. The after Spain conquered Granada and they revolted to reinstate shariah law 2 times in 1490s and 1570s the Spanish king relocated them throughout Castile where they assimilated. The expulsion edicts of 1609 expelled valenciana and aragonese peasants to Tunisia, morocco, and Algeria.
Culteraly but not genetically
Yes
I would say iberians are essencialy paleolithic old stuff, from the what is knowed as indo-europeans and some neolithic also... basically the people that originated the celtiberians, lusianians, celtici, vetones and other's.
Baskid are pre-indoeuropeans
Basically this, that's genes proximity right? something between the french-english and the italians
The lusitani are a pre indo European group who ended up taking in SOME gallic culture
No, from what i've read, lusitanians were indo-europeans, the doubt is if they were celtic core, or para-celtic and proto-celtic.
Huh.
Really ?
I always understood that they belonfed to the same north african Berbers who crossed into iberia some But hell
If im wrong im wrong, thanks user.
the dominance of tribes were something like this in iberian peninsula
>Iberian was a part of the language family of Neolithic Europeans
>existed until 2nd century
Pretty wild
Aquitan also existed until the middle ages in north eastern Iberia and South France, which was Pre Indoeuropean too
>Trajano, Adriano, Teodosio
There was very significant roman population including patrician and senatorial families, particularly in Baetica, more or less modern AndalucĂa.
I recall the Lusitani were definitely Indo-Europeans, but a Celtic connection for that particular tribe is in question unlike their northern neighbors.
As far as we can tell: Spaniards/Portuguese are a mix of native Aquitanian/Basque people with significant Roman, Celtic, and Germanic influence. Southern and eastern Spain tend to have little Celtic or Germanic genetics, the Celts and Suebi/Visigoths mainly settled in the north and west.
While your post might be archaeologically accurate Iberians are a very homogenic group now except for the Basques.
Real Nordics
If the Lusitani were Indo-Europeans then they were celts. Wtf else were they going to be?.
Also you forgot the main population group, the Iberians. Prerroman Spain was Iberians, Celts, Celtiberians and Basques. And then some greek and punic colonies.
But '''Aquitanians'''? Lel, wtf is even that?
>Northern Italians are closer to the Portuguese than to the Southern Italians
pretty weird
Celts were not the first Indo-Europeans at the Atlantic shores according to the mainstream view right now/since always.
Celts were an Urnfield or later Central European expansion.
Not that guy you are replying to, but Aquitanians were a group related to the Vasconii, the Aquitanian language is thought to be Proto-Basque.
...
Yes they were since ever. Celts were a Hallstat expansion in turn an Urnfeld expansion in turn a Corded Ware IE expansion. It wouldn't make much sense to find ones preceding the others anywhere in western europe, but I'm sure you have proofs that demonstrate otherwise and that Lusitani were not celts or mixed (if anything, with iberians, tartessians or turdetani) celtiziced people in culture and everything.
Ok, and the mongols are from Mongolia. Just like the aquitani, they do not relate to Spain.
Eastern/Northern Bell Beakers have been genetically linked to the Corded Ware and Yamnaya horizon.