The original supreme gentleman

that would be confucius, or especially zhu xi

>He has the best people
ahahahahaha. butthurt trumplet detected. keep drinking the kool aid faggot, i'm sure jeff sessions is the best, as is jared "i got my job because my dad-in-law is president and i got into harvard cause my dad gave a 3 million dollar donation" kushner.

>r-resist
t. butthurt clitary supporter

kek, why are people still defending this fat retard? he was the lesser of two evils before the election but now it should be obvious he was an opportunist and a snake oil salesman... he will change nothing.

>don't venerate the proleterian mango like Mao himself.

What are you a reacctionary bourgoise?

This.

*blocks your industrialization*

>wahhhh everything that attacks my supreme leader is a meaniieee wahhhhh
laffin at you desu. the amount of doublethink and butthurt projection of trumpcucks is enormous

>Guys
>What if we
>GUYS
>What if we
>OK seriously guys are you listening
>What if we took all the seeds in China
>And buried them 6 feet underground
>So that their struggles would mimic those of the proletariat
>And bear higher yields!
>I know it sounds crazy but just trust me on this one it'll be great

>what if we plant seeds directly next to each other so that they can form a class consciousness and unionize to defeat the bourgeois soil
daily reminder that 2 (two) world leaders unironically thought this was a good idea

>don't freezing your seeds like a true proletarian farmer.

Revisionist scum

Lysenkoism makes me so god damn angry

>In 1948, genetics was officially declared "a bourgeois pseudoscience"; all geneticists were fired from their jobs (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued.

And yet today leftists still do the same with intelligence and try to "prove" that it is not due to genetics but due to the environment, because otherwise it would contradict the equality of all men.

thats an awful analogy. to master agricultural science and selective breeding is not the same thing as proving that humans are solely a product of their genetics. fuck off back to /pol/ my man

>everything I dont like is russian
top tard

>Soviets reject genetics as bourgeois/fascist lies because muh socialist principlies

>SJWs reject genetics as bourgeois/fascist lies because muh equality

>This is you mind with stalinism

Why are we getting raided by leftypol faggots who are literally sucking Mao "Kill the birds because they sometimes eat grain and then the pests they didn't kill cause mass-starvation" Zedong?

I think you guys were less pathetic when you were spamming your BLACKED folders.

epic strawman, trumpweenie. first you call me shillary supporter, then a believer in russiagate. both baseless accusations to deflect from the fact that you have no argument against trump being a nepotist rather than "le master businessman" which you gobbled right up from the /rthedonald/ propaganda mill.

Mao Zedong was a retard and you're a crazed loner NEET.

I think he's just trolling you, the response to your question didn't even make sense.

>capitalism did nothing wrong

nice adhom faggot, you're just another butthurt DMC operative wasting his time shilling on a congolese arrow fletching forum. Take a hard look at yourself in the mirror desu

>the CEOs of corporations go around Africa dirtying their water and giving people malaria
:thinking:

I don't recall Capitalists ordering people to go out and kill all birds and then the bugs wiped out all crops and then ordering people to melt down all their tools into useless pig iron and then die again.
Stop defending Mao you fucking faggot.

again, you have such an childish grasp of science and history you fail to see how stupid your analogy is. lysenkoism demonstrated the fucked up prerogatives of the soviet state, not the inherent "badness" of ideas of equality. stalin had a liking for lysenkoism, perhaps cause it fit with his own worldview, so he imposed it consensus on it by violence and coercion. There were just as many scientists and perhaps party members against it, but to speak out against it would have put you at odds with stalin, and to be at odds at stalin was to invite the full coercive force and propagandistic organs of the soviet state being turned against you and annihilating you.
secondly, as stupid as lysenkoism seems to us today and as dubious as it seemed to contemporary scientists then, it wasn't some freakish movement that arose from nowhere. It was a rehash of lamarckism, and lamarckism, even then, still had adherents or people who saw some truth in it. Indeed, a sort of "soft" neo-lamarckism is making a comeback today with the discovery of epigenetics. Lamarckism isn't as goofy as it sounds.
Furthermore, Lamarckism as promoted by lysenko and stalin wasn't only promoted from the left. The whole premise of "Social Darwinism", despite the "Darwin" featured to prominently in the name, actually is a misnomer. Many so-called social darwinists were actually lamarkists in substance, and Social Darwinism was and still is popular today, despite its being discredited by professional scientific research.

yeah probably so
wat
no argument, again. only entirely retarded understanding of what is a logical fallacy and what is not.
>you're just another butthurt DMC operative
so, in other words, you lose an argument, so you're only option left to recover your pride (on an internet forum lmao) is to attack me as a secret operative because anybody who actually tries to shatter your retarded delusions is must be from a super secret evil organization. kys desu

...

there are also people who see leftist ideas in darwin while ignoring or being ignorant of the lamarckian view

...

...

>Lamarckism isn't as goofy as it sounds.

>Freeze seed to get cold resistance.

>not goofy

Nice seeds lysenko. Want to bring them to to the kremlin?

well, yes, full-blown lamarckism is dumb, and the problem is that stalin adhered to it as an ideology not as something to be proven scientifically or not, which soviet scientists were entirely capable of in other fields of science free from political intervention. Lysenko himself I think was an ideologue or promoted it purely for personal gain, if i recall (or out of both reasons). He was certainly a fraudster of some sort.

...

now onto the lamarckist section

...

>the original supreme gentleman

I'm not sure what your point is here. It is a fact of historical record that Mao fucked an enormous number of young girls / women.

...

this is the last one, theres a few more pages left so i'll keep posting on request if anyone is interested.

With his smegma dick. Notice.

*blocks your harvest*

nothing personal sparrows

>we got trolled by applebaum therefore every death that ever occurred is capitalism's fault
commieboos are so easily triggered

>t. wageslave

Pure ideology

The kid in the back knows that they've just caused their own death.