Why do houses typically only get bought by two people (couples, husbands and wives) but you never see groups of friends or like multiple couples that are friends pool their monies together to buy luxurious places with a lot of bedrooms and space? Wouldn't it cost less money in the end if, let's say 3 couples (6 people) shared a big ass villa, like one big family/small community, with enough room for everybody, kids growing up together, etc.?
Why do houses typically only get bought by two people (couples...
Other urls found in this thread:
marketplace.org
twitter.com
> mixing money and friends
bad idea
Clearly you have never bad shitty roomates
I'd rather mix money with a trusted male friend than a girlfriend who will just spend it on frivolous shit
Cause people want to have their own peace and not live in one house with 2 other families who will have 2 kids on average making that 12 people living under one roof?
Also that villa looks a shitload more expensive than 3 regular houses.
Many reasons but I think ego is involved too. They want " their " house, reproducing the scheme they were taught it was normal ( not saying it's not ) but yeah I guess if you " own " a house with 3 other friends then it's not " your " house and the human brain become not happy
>Hey user want to go all in on a house for the next 30 years?
>Sure user, sounds like a great plan.
>Hey user, I just met this girl and we're getting married in the spring. I'll either need your half of the equity or for you to move out.
Yeah, that sounds like a great plan.
good idea, as long as all these conditions are met:
- the big ass villa is literally divided into three separated and locked apartments
- the friends are literally silent like monks everytime I need a nap or some peace
- the friends won't waste/damage anything without paying immediately in full, and will always immediately pay their share of taxes and shit
Only works with close family and even then it's a big IF.
Real question is why do americans kick their kids out at 18