Black Europeans

How much of this checks out?

Other urls found in this thread:

simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_expeditions_to_Lake_Chad_and_western_Africa
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Maurice
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Maybe the Roman Briton and Norman Priests are feasible, the latter could pass for an swarthy Arab with the quality of animation, but the rest are complete bullshit.

this is at least the third thread on this topic in the past three days.

those videos got BTFO

1)Romans = Yeah, that works (not that black, but plausible)
2)Celts? Hahahahahahaha no
3)Plausible...but unlikely. From his armour, he's meant to be a saracen they dragged back
4)Not at all
5)Not at all

this is what happens when you absorb year of memes, cultivating paranoia, they get triggered into making a fool of themselves over nothing

>they still triggered

Please BBC, never stop

I can't find any of these videos except the first one which was uploaded by someone else.

It doesn't. North africans are not west/central africans. By the time of hadrian around 100AD, there had only been minor expeditions in subsaharan africa with relatively limited trade and certainly none of the SSA population had enough time in that small window to be integrated and become citizens.

>They were made by theRoman Empirebetween the first and the fourth centuryAD. One of the main reasons of the explorations, according to academics like Jonathan Roth, was to procure gold and spices[1]
simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_expeditions_to_Lake_Chad_and_western_Africa

If we were talking about numidians or egyptians as potential legionaries, then I would agree but no sorry BBC, tyrone was not a centurion in britain prior to/ during the construction of hadrian's wall.

>black celts
yes, and white aboriginals while we're at it. Or mauri canaanites. The sky is apparently the limit here.

Why do white boys get so twiggered over Blacks?