Why are her boobs showing?

Why are her boobs showing?

so we can see them

French know a thing or two about eroticism

/thread

It looks more raggedy, showing the roughness of the struggle, and showing your tits is still a matter of personal liberty, to not be constrained by societal norms, my question is why the fuck would the July Monarchy even use this painting if they expressly didn't want revolution?

Dainty 18th century women's clothing was not made to survive a scuffle. It illustrates that she's not their for show; she's in the thick of it. Given the diversity of those around her, old, young, well dressed, rags, men, and women (do I spy an African in there?), she's just part of the artist's larger point that the revolution was for the good of the country at large.

Because she is a strong independent womin.

>showing your tits is still a matter of personal liberty, to not be constrained by societal norms
it's actually very common in paintings, even portraits. someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it was common to show your breasts in paintings to symbolize motherlieness

Because Liberals (unlike man loving Commies and cuck loving Fascists) love dem tittays m8.

it's literally fanservice, what fucking convoluted tangents are you fags building up here?

My question is what's with the pantsless dude on the ground?

It's such an excellent image.

>mfw i realise our generation will never have such a moment

You know, Op's picture is supposed to commemorate the July Revolution that overthrew the Bourbon monarchy and replace it with the July Monarchy under Louis-Philippe I of House Orléanist.

The monarchy lasted from 1830 to 1848, being replaced by the Second Republic and then the Second Empire when its president, Napoleon III staged a coup on himself.

Op's picture is stupid and pointless with its original context.

and the guy who is obviously staring at his cock

look at his eyes, he's actually checking them out both

This. Niggas would literally say the milk leaking out of her tits symbolises "the source of life" when the artist just probably had a fetish for lactation and just wanted to share his kinks.

That cockeyed genius.

Y'all retard, it's just the symbol of the Mother guiding the Revolution, the breasts are a symbol of fertility inherent to the mother, like she's the revolution herself feeding the children of the revolution

↓
hahaha like fucking clockwork

>

>Years of training and study to be competent at painting
>Each piece taking long days over the course of months
>Excessively planned and detailed work
>"haha lol they just like the tiddy so they painted it, stop trying to look for depth in pretty pictures"

Which do you think would be more fun to paint? A slightly shaded front of a stola, or a heavenly pair of bouncing tits?

The french revolution was a jewish false flag designed to tear down white western european society. Liberty leading the charge with her tits out is just the Jews trying to corrupt western morals.

French people put B-cup tits in everything they draw

>No nudie mags
>No internet porn
>No sex tapes
Gotta jerk off to something.

I've jerked off to this painting many times

>it's another "ignore the complex series of social problems that lead to armed revolts and just blame da joos" post

To represent freedom and/or being mother of the people

This isn't "The french revolution", retard. This painting is about the July Revolution

are self-coups the most redpilled type of coup?

>tits or gtfo
Did you not get the memo? This is Veeky Forums afterall

t. American

You can't be the mother of the people without flashing your boobs?

>why is x?
>because x means y
>SO YOU CAN'T HAVE Y WITHOUT X?
Americans

You don't know that x means y. You just made that up.

>can't into symbolism or boobies

>You don't know that x means y. You just made that up.
I'm not the user that posted "being mother of the people" as the reason but are you implying that's not a valid interpretation?

So we can suck on em in battle.

...

so yeah, motherhood, exactly what I was saying

This. The guy wants to sell a painting. He wants to get some money for it. Would you pay more for one with tits or without?

why does this stupid thread have replies?
But seriously, you're going to ask this question considering her gender and the source material?
(hint: the artist is a male and French)
these guys get it

"There is a tradition that in some battles troops already wavering and beginning to run have been rallied by the women, who offer unceasing prayers, bare their breasts, and point out that captivity lies waiting close at hand." Tacitus' Germania pg 93 & 94.

people like tiddies

Literally was a belief of the Enlightenment thinkers though. The aristocracy didn't breastfeed. Read Rousseau

From what I remember, it's creation was mostly just a PR move to connect the July Monarchy to the popular uprisings in Paris post-fact. Upon completion it was shoved into storage.

Its called "classical nudity" f*ggots. Its basically neoclassicism in painted form

Holy shit look at the painting you fucking childish lecher. Do those look like heavenly tits to you. If you actually stopped to look at them they look quite stiff. Michelangelo did simolar with hos women paintings and sculpture to indicate their martial virtue. It was also a sign of being plder and "used up" so aka a mother who is bpast child bearing age

unlike in the US, tits=fertility and life rather than pure sexual appeal

>comparing Michelangelo to this mediocrity
Lmao