ANCIENT SITES

Malta 3000 bc

Iberia 2000 bc

Sardinia 3600 bc

wood can survive for that long?

France 5000 bc

Aegean,4000 bc

nigger we have wood from dinosaur times.

Maiorca 1400 bc

retard

Ireland 3200 bc

Ancient Art can be included as well,interesting Egyptian figurine,5000 BC
Yeah look up Neolithic Neatherlands,very fascinating

Orkney 3000 bc

Fucking hell most of these are amazing considering their time.

Why do we know so little about the proto-Europeans Veeky Forums?

Sardinia 3200 bc

Malta 3700-2500 bc

Malta 4rd-3rd millenium bc

Malta, same age

Same as above

That's nice
>mfw Greece is underrated

Sardinia 3200 bc

Greece,2000 BC

France 4500-3000 bc

Sardinia 1500 bc

France, 4000-3000 bc

Kosovo,3000 BC

Sardinia 1500 bc

Bulgaria 4700-4200 bc

Sicily 2000-1500 bc

Croatia 3000 BC

Romania 3500 BC

Why so fat?

It was most likely completely unattainable.
And we desire what we can't have.
Its the same reason her shoulders aren't warped, or her girth stops at her ankles.
The same with other "fertility statues", often have large signs people in their era haven't seen true hambeasts.

...

You mean Sumerian?

Georgia, 2000 bc

10000 bc Finland
Stunning

That wasn't built by Scots

yes it was

Anatolia 12000 BC

Egypt >10000BC

Wasent it 2500 BC

Around 5000 bc if the indonesian report is to be believed but theres been a lot of shit during the whole thing whats with paranormal and conspiracy theorist calling it ancient alien pyramid and such. If its real though it means our country has some of the most oldest megalithic sites and in really excited

...

One of the crazier recosntruction theory

Geologists have identified substantial water erosion patterns on the Squinx.
The necessary rain events in the area stopped around 10k BC, therefore the Squinx must be at least that old.

The megalithic valley temple is build with limestone quarried from the Squinx building site. It shows the same erosion patterns and was faced with smaller granite AFTER the erosion was already there.

Therefore building activity later than 3000BC was likely restoration and extension of the much older monuments.

Egyptologists are in denial about it, because they would have to admit that they were spreading bullshit for all of their academic careers.

They drilled there and carbon dated the organic matter
>pic related

>wood can survive for that long?

yes, they're typically found in oxygen deprived bogs and professionally preserved after the fact

The head is from pharaoh Khafra who lived around 2500 bc, I don't know about the rest of the structure

its also possible that the erosion was caused by the sand it was buried in for thousands of years

speculative design of course

>woah, a bunch of rocks: the thread

Yeah, it's about monuments that are thousands of years old, and they've all been left in ruins since at least 3000 years

Oh look! A good thread that isn't about nigger hating, false flagging, discussing who's white or blogposting about depression!

Like I said, there was restoration work going on.

The head of the Squinx is considerably less weathered, therefore it is likely that is was recarved in that time

No it's not, wind erosion shows other patterns
The vertical water erosion are best observed in the enclosure of the Squinx
The water erosion theory was postulated by Anthony West and uniformly accepted when presented at a geologist conference.

>pic related

without upkeep most of our modern constructs would be reclaimed by nature within 500 years

Peru, 2300 bc

Egypt 2500 bc

Egypt 2600 bc

Iran 1300 bc

Sardinia 1600 bc

Pakistan 3000-2500 bc

India 3700 bc, ancient toilet

t.Ivan

Eastern Iran, border with Afghansitan, 3000 bc,

Might not seem impressive but it's the remains of ancient city with several thousands of inhabitants belonging to a lost civilization

India 3700-2500 bc

India 2500-2000 bc

I've heard the erosion hypothesis is not commonly accepted for a number of reason, one being that Egypt was wetter in the past.

The water erosion hypothesis is not accepted by egyptologists like Hawass, with the argument that "we found some stuff at the same place that's from khafra" and "we didn't find anything else that we think is that old"

The dating of the valley temple rests on the evidence that they found a statue of Khafre inside.
The thought that the temple might have been already there and he simply did a bit of decoration doesn't seem to have crossed their minds.

Pretty much every geologist that was asked about the erosion pattern said "yeah, that's from rain"
It also completely ignores new evidence like that shows there have been cultures in neighbouring regions doing megalithic construction far earlier than previously thought.

Another argument supporting an older Squinx is connecting it to the stars. It is aligned to due east, staring directly at the sunrise at the spring equinox.

It would be logical that the form of the Squinx (a lion) would be connected to the astrological age of leo ~10k to 8k BC, when the sun at the equinox used to rise in the house of leo.

The stars were of great importance to the ancients and we see a lot of mythical symbolism change with the ages.

Oh, how far they've fallen.

Do you have any idea how well planned a city needs to be in order to accommodate for designated shitting streets!

So basically, Mediterranean people are autistic and loved building absolutely useless monuments while pragmatic and reasonable steppe Indo-Europeans focused on conquering the world instead.

You are wrong. Indoeuropean people at the time had more influence between all the cultures over there, also europeans reached europe thousands of years after indoeuropeans already settled on the middle-east and anatolian lands.

>You are wrong. Indoeuropean people at the time had more influence between all the cultures over there

Okay...

>also europeans reached europe thousands of years after indoeuropeans already settled on the middle-east and anatolian lands.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh

>fallen into disuse

Wait, do you mean the fucking Orkney, the foggy frozen islands near Scotland?

The one good thread on this board
Macedonia 6500 BC

Sphinx rock formation Romania
lol

>Egypt was wetter in the past
that is the exact reason that water erosion doesn't make sense if you buy the egyptologist's line.

T H I C C
H
I
C
C

Shit, this is something to keep up to date on then.

Yes

They didnt focus on it, it happened slowly and indieuropeans killed eachother all the time

No, they didnt: none of The monuments built here except maybe one Made in greece were made by indoeuropeans

Varna Necropolis 4000-4600BC. The oldest gold treasure discovered in the world. This dude was wealthy that it was generally thought that there was less gold in the entire of Europe than the amount found in his grave. Plus motherfucker had a golden condom. Swag as fuck.

This thread is fuckin' dope.

Thx for posting these. Comfy as fuck.

What? If Egypt was more wet then that increases the erosion and shortens the amount of time it takes to erode the base of the sphinx. I was actually taking a Historical Geology class and my professor mentioned this exact thing

So are we to believe that the "restorations" did not include removing the signs of water erosion?

What the fuck.

He's must've been really fucking liked if nobody robbed his grave back in his day

Malta, 3200-2500 bc

Egypt 2667-2648 bc

Knossos 1700-1400 bc