so how come christian states like the HRE, France, and Hungary managed to last a millennium if not longer in a mostly peaceful europe but everything went to shit in the 18th and 19th centuries
was it (((masons))) or the (((renaissance))) or the (((eternal anglo))) or something else?
I just want to know why all of those christian monarchies were peachy for 1000 years and then you had all these sudden failures like the 2nd reich and the french revolution
Owen Flores
>Reformation >Civil wars >Age of enlightenment >French revolution and Napoleonic wars
It was a gradual and complex process. Meme answers are for brainlets.
Chase Torres
(((you)))
Henry Taylor
so why did napoleon declare war on the HRE and russia again?
Ryder Phillips
A variety of reasons. Also, he declared war on Austria, Prussia and others, not on the HRE, the HRE was largely defunct by that time.
Brandon Nelson
I thought Austria was part of the HRE
Owen Foster
>Third coallition was an offensive French war The Austrians lost the third coallition. And Napoleon declared war on the Russians so that he could enforce the continental blockade, since the Russians started to suffer economically.
Aaron Sanders
Why did the Austrians and Anglos care so much about Napoleon becoming king of France?
Grayson Anderson
The Ancient Regime feared that the spread of Revolutionary ideas would result in the same way as France. The anglos were far more suspicious since, they feared someone like Cromwell would come again.
Matthew Lee
Napoleon threatened the hegemony of their nations by being an expantionist and militaristic figure,they were already quite cross with the French revolution which ideals threatened their very own rule and right of kings
Leo Jackson
Right so the obvious solution is to keep going to war until we win
Jaxson Jenkins
Industrial revolution and international trade enabled the kikes to take power. That's all there is to it, technology was a mistake.
Jaxson King
>king of France He never was king of France.
Dylan Green
It was, just the HRE lost all its political power to Austria, Prussia and others long time ago. It was just an empty hull.
Charles Sanchez
Still a monarch
Dominic Jones
Right he was L'empereur de la Françe
Owen Stewart
kek
Hudson Adams
Nope, his title was Empereur des Français
Jack Walker
Does it really matter? One is emperor of France and one is emperor of the French. Literally who cares
Logan Price
>Does it really matter? At title? At that time? Absolutely, it matters a big deal. Also, see it positive, you learned something new today, Napoleon was not king of France but Emperor of the French.
Nathaniel Ortiz
Something like that. The solution was to organize and attack in coordination. But instead, many of the monarchs acted arrogantly and attacked by their side, believing that they were going to take a piece of France.
Grayson Ramirez
They kept the people stupid with the church and anybody could be killed without consecuences for the upper stratas
Owen Cook
This a web for 18 yeards old
Angel Brooks
Yeah, OP should leave
Eli Jones
>in a mostly peaceful europe
What the fuck are you talking about? How was Europe peaceful?