Is Western society walking towards the normalization of pedophillia?

We should have an upper age limit for voting too. B**mers ruin everything.

You should only be able to vote if you don't have government assistance, pay taxes, own property, and your married with a kid.

Only because fags are into pederasty and hebephilia and its a stones toss from giving them what they want.

>if you don't have government assistance

I guess that rules out most bankers and executives huh?

it should be low-30 high-60. imho

Correct. Bankers shouldn't vote nor should they exist.

This really isn't the right place to ask this question. You're on Veeky Forums, home of degenerates

The future is now old man

no, both the left and the right are against it, the right views it as degeneracy, feminists are horrified by it if not other leftists

Giving them this might actually help lowering the cases of child abuse.

Yes but it will be presented as pedophilia but "sexual rights of children"

>implying feminists didn't raise the age of consent.
The whole nation was Mississippi before the women were emancipated. Old mates didn't want to compete with lolis for mates.

One of the few things I would say would literally never happen. All sorts of weird cybernetic and genetic engineering bullshit we can't even begin imagine is going to become acceptable in a few decades but not this.

"Pedophilia" is too convenient as a boogeyman to just give up. It's useful for pushing for more control and censorship on the internet. It's one of the things everybody can hate and feel morally superior about themselves while doing it. Even violent murderers in prison feel better about themselves because they're "not as bad" as those pedophiles.

>both the left and the right are against it
wrong, the left fully supports it, why else would they be so supportive of the "LGBT" and """""refugees"""""

Fuck off /pol/ shill. Everyone knows the pedos all congregate with the right-wing and religiousfags.

Who do you think believes in the illuminati-reptilian-pedo conspiracy theories?

>The left is not degenerate

>this is what leftist shills actually beleive

how many refugees have you left rape you sister today, cuck?

At what age does a child magically become an adult and become capable of consent? The pedo hunters have no logic.

...

You say pedo robot, but it's just deciding the most efficient way to kill her

>At what age does a child magically become an adult and become capable of consent?

18 years and one second

As long as they consent I don't see how it violates the NAP.

If you give it up for candy when you likely could have charged $600 a pop due to high demand and low supply of lolis then it will just educate you on proper pricing and opportunity costs.

Are you okay user? Is there something wrong? Let it all out.

There has always been an undercurrent of 'pedophilia' amongst the upper class and richer echelons of white males of Western society.

Look at the British westminster scandal during the 50s-70s or the Jimmy Saville case. Even such lauded figures as Lawrence of Arabia and Field Marshal Montgomery had a bit of a suspect streak in them.

Child prostitutes already caught on to market principles in Japan.
Look up compensated dating. Those lolis ain't cheap.

Weed and beards have already been normalized, this is probably the next step in normalizing Islam. It's all social engineering.

based japan is ahead of their time

>Weed
>Islam
Are you retarded?

...

Baba Ku is a legendary folkloric character from Balkh in Afghanistan, a Sufi adherent who legendarily introduced hashish to Afghanistan.[1]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_Afghanistan

Right. I imagine a fairly cute 8/10 lol who stays in shape and only does it as a side job could likely earn close to a million in the current market over 8 years, 8-16.

Obviously as it became more normalized, supply would increase, but I bet they'd still pull in $40-120k based on workload.

That is money the government is literally stealing with regulation! It's theft!

Man Sufis are unironically based.

Children gain the right of self-determination the moment they are able to sufficiently take care of themselves.

Food, shelter, clothing, the whole shebang. Notice this also determines that people who need outside assistance to take care of themselves lose that right, so people who live on welfare or can't hold a job a reduced to children and only are allowed the privileges their caretaker allows for them.

A sixteen year old who can hold down a job and afford their own place has better judgment and a better claim to the right of self-determination than 30 year old weeaboo neets. Prove me wrong.

Our word "hash" literally comes from Arabic "hashish". Are you retarded?

The same argument that is used for not allowing older people to vote has been used to justify political oppression since the dawn of democracy.

>amongst the upper class and richer echelons of white males of Western society
why single out the west? It's not like you don't see the same thing in asia or the middle east or even africa. The pakistani and afghan tea boys still exist; 10th century china had "bigbrother- little brother" marriage contracts; sudanese tribes would marry young boys and so on and so forth.

Those who won our independence by revolution were not cowards. They did not fear political change. They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty. To courageous, self-reliant men, with confidence in the power of free and fearless reasoning applied through the processes of popular government, no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present, unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion. If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.
Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).

>child sex dolls
Sounds fine to me. The government shouldn't have the right to tell you what kind of dolls you can and can not have, for fuck's sake. And these would have therapeutic value.

Does it genuinely reduces pedophilia?

>Some random post from some random forum 2 years ago represent a vague group of people

What's with America's retarded state laws? I can have sex with a 16 year old in Alabama, but if i have sex with a 16 year in California i become a Pedo?

Did you mean to ask if it genuinely reduced adult-child sexual acts? Probably, access to porn has been shown to reduce sex crimes.

>what is federalism
>what is the objective fact that American states are comparable to most countries

>Mexico also uses state-by-state basis for AoC
>only makes fun of America

Fuck off Pedro, you're not fooling anyone.

The contemporary prog already has no valid objection to pedophilia (they think children can consent to sex changes or even euthanasia, they have no problems with self-destructive behavior as long as there is consent) so, probably yes.

Adulthood should be at 13

>Australia and Mexico do the same thing as America
>only criticizes the US

Lol stay mad Abdul

its quite understandable I have been through the same arguments when refuting the illogical and errant homosexual ideology. they are quiet stubborn autists who defend their sexual deviancy with mediocre arguments.

I feel like OP's wording and stupid question takes away from the really difficult question that the picture did ask. Would it be right to let pedophiles has access to child dolls if it meant reducing child abuse

None cares about Australia or Mexico though

Accusing me of being part of whatever group you hate is not an argument.

The medical treatments still require parental consent. A 5 year old can't walk into a therapist session and demand HRT against their parent's wishes.

Is there any reason not to? If it can be shown without reasonable doubt it decreases the rate of child abuse then it would be a way of decreasing the harm against society's children whithout any setbacks.

I didn't mention what the medical treatment requires, I said I've encountered countless leftists who believe the child can meaningfully consent to sex change or even euthanasia. If the child can do that, then it can clearly consent to sex ( of course, I don't think either of those things are true). And since progs repeatedly defend people engaging in self-destructive behavior, they can't even use the "ok children can't consent but it's bad for them!" argument

There could be hidden secondary effects, or it could lower short term abuse rate but cause them to increase in the long term through whatever means.