Why did Spaniards have to destroy all this?

Just for a bunch of stupid yellow rocks?

Because their sacrificing houses smelled worse than the slaughterhouses of castille.
Inside those temples boys were tortured, raped, ripped open, and their flesh consumed by pedophiles.
Were you a humble christian and you would do the same.
"Witches" were a joke compared to these sodomite jungleniggers.

Because its so shinny

The Spanish did not destroy anything, they only created and brought civilization to the unenlightened and backwards peoples of the new world.

>euro apes literally wiped out an entire continent's worth of people by being unhygenic disease carriers
>for some reason brown people are seen as the dirty ones

really makes you think

>When you attack Indian empires for gold and it causes inflation so big your "Empire" becomes irrelevant.

Well after 300 years of being relevant i think it's a good deal

Why do you do this

You aren't deceiving anyone, stop spamming your ugly face, moor

This.

>ywn stand on top of Tenochtitlan's Great Pyramid and receive the submission of the multitudes
>ywn win eternal glory for God and country, scoring a decisive victory against the heathen and ensuring your name will live forever in the annals of history for ten thousand years

>spaniards have a whole continent filled with vast resources to exploit
>they still went and took land in asia anyway

>tfw we are revealing the facts of such "epic" adventure thanks to archeological findings
Good enough to me to be honest

>Why did white people have to destroy Anime and White girls dressed like Incas?

>tfw Eurofags are so holier-than-thou that they can unleash a host of treachery and depravity and try to justify it by "Well, they bullied each other too, soo..."
>tfw this actually a convincing argument to them

The real argument is that the Inca could have stopped it if they were stronger. In the end that's all that really matters.
Why did they do it? They were capable of doing so, and the Inca were incapable of doing anything against them.

Is that the answer you want? The Spaniards were no more savage than the Inca, they were just better equipped

am calling white washing on those cosplayers

Incas were a group of less than 90000 people rulling over 15 millions, before the spanish came.

The diseases killed at least 60% of the population and the ultra-dependant administrative system got ruined. Some recently conquered cultures and big enemies started attacking the Inca. All of this happened after Huayna Inca Capac died due to an european disease leavung no official sucessor and not-completing his plans; then the civil war started and several sides and interests appeared, and all of this happened when the war and hostility situation was happening at the time.

Spanish didn't fight the Incas till the last years. All battles were fought by natives.

Guess what, Europe got decimated by foreign disease too, it was called the Plague. Shit happens.
You can whine about how unfair it is, but that doesn't matter in the end. Circumstance favored Spain.

>might makes right
>posts anime
Fuck off weeb

Those diseases are small fry compared to what natives dealt with.

Right doesn't fucking matter, you dipshit. Right has never come into conquest. Nobody agreed that France was just going to be France; France had to defend itself from England to be France. It doesn't matter if they were sick or not.
Humanities faggots arguing about the morality of shit that happened 500 years ago in order to present a modern day victim narrative are the worst. There were no Noble Savages; no Beautiful, irreplaceable cultures.

Might may not make right, but it does make Nations. It's the only thing that does

>ripping people's hearts out then dancing around in their flayed skins, is bullying

It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter if their society got razed to the ground by Martians before Spain came. None of it changes the fact that they didn't stop the conquests, because they were incapable. You're not going to get a participation trophy, because you didn't feel good.

>eurangutans
>1/3 deaths
>invaded by nomads

>Inca divine blood
>60-80% of deaths for several years
>administrative system destroyed
>bigger population enemies still fucking around near your empire
>rebels all over your empire
>civil war destroying thr imperial army and diving them by sucesor interests
>lucky miracle happens as the spaniards met the civil war winner Inca when he was returning to the capital
>yet spaniards couldn't do shit till they brought their army from Spain
>invaded by "colonizers" who destroyed all culture, art and structures that were on all cities
Hmm...

Kek two of them are Asian.

The mighty spanish army of 200 soldiers

I honestly thought two of them were digital paintings
What point are you trying to make? That if the Inca had a redo they'd win?
If you think the Inca were super rad and totally could have beat the Spaniards 1v1 with tourni rules, fine. Doesn't change the fact that they lost

The Byzantine Empire got fucked by a plague that ultimately stopped it from reclaiming Roman imperial lands. Suffered through multiple civil wars, succession conflicts, multi-front wars, the rise of their neighboring countries into great powers. They still ended up lasting all the way to 1453, almost 800 years later.
Byzantine culture barely exists now in the land it once ruled and is mainly read about in books.

People playing victim cards for nations and empires from history when they killed one another before the Euros came sounds so weak.

You should be happy the Chinese didn't find a way to the Americas. They'd have wiped everyone out and would have zero Chinese guilt afterwards.

It's not morality. It's literally comparing Leonardo Da Vinci with a maimed body with a mediocre person with a gun.

Literally the same as comparing mycenaean culture to dorian savages that just happened to use iron.

Why do I feel like those costumes really didn't exist for women back during that time period?

Probably because those bikinis look like modern bikinis?

Also, the Turks only took Constantinople because Germany sold them a Cannon Byzantium was too poor to buy. Had Enrico Dandolo not ruined Byzantium, they could still be here today.
See, none of that ultimately matters. The only reason anything happens is because the circumstances surrounding them, random or consequential, allow them too.
If the fall of the Inca makes you sad, go write a poem or something.

Anything to end this retarded dickmeasuring contest

Leonardo da Vinci was a faggot and a procrastinator. The man whom Leonardo wanted to be already existed, and his name was Filippo Brunelleschi

Except that natives beat the Inca. The administrative and absolutist system was weak at the moment. Incas were less than 1/100 of the population of their empire.

Spaniards didn't fight the Inca till they got their army to SA. The recent archrological remains demonstrates that all corpses had native weapon wounds.

Even most of the reported spanish battles that they supposedly fought against cavalry were actually fought by natives against Incas.

>wiped
Wrong. Natives beat the Inca.

we wuz kangs

They were though.

What the fuck are you talking about? You're telling me the people who beat the Byzantines to shreds for a period of 1000 years weren't native to the region they lived in?

What kind of logic are you using? We're telling you that using a shitty defense like that means nothing. This isn't some kind of pride contest. Complaining about your country being wiped out by natives means diddly squat.

Carthage no longer exists. Mycenae no longer exists. Khwarezm no longer exists. Poland at one point in time stopped existing. A shitload of Chinese states and their ethnic tribes got wiped off the face of the planet several times in their history. What the fuck is even your point?

>rule over a large empire with a small population
>expect the large empire to not revolt sooner or later

Those breasts look quite exquisite. Is that a movie scene for a porn or something?

>revolt was controlled preventively all the time through a strong proto-socialist system of administration and spreading a commom sense of identity with the division of tribes and migration

>the death of the 60-80% won't affect the system

Most likely some cosplay, if it is porn then I demand source

>incapable of doing so
This point.

The fall of the Inca empire has two events purely based on luck, that decided main future circumstances.

The Inca was dividing the empire by two parts north-south. Before finishing his plans of the conquest of north SA, he dies leaving no official sucesor due to european diseases.

The civil war winner was returning to the capital to put some order to the nobles and finishing the tribes threat, just then the spanish met him when they were looking for Cusco, then they kidnapped him.

Inflation didn't make the Spanish empire irrelevant though

It doesn't matter why you can't do something. If you can't run the marathon because you accidentally broke your leg, you still can't run the marathon.
The reason why they can't doesn't matter.

>"Witches" were a joke compared to these sodomite jungleniggers.
This. That speak of the human sacrifices that the European pagans did, and yet they were nothing compared to what those disgusting beings did.
>Let's boil babies and eat them for the glory of Taloc. If they cry, we're going to have a good year of rain.

If you are fine claiming that a gorilla is superior to a human without weapons, I can agree with you.

Can you imagine being this butthurt?

So you don't agree? Also stop using toon pictures. This is not your pedophile board.

Anime belongs on all boards. Also, yes I don't agree to your overly reductive analogy. You're just a super butthurt anti-Europe retard, and your kind has no place in history.
History is about what happened, not if what happened was right.

>only matters the outcome
>overly reductive
Hehehe

So you disagree with yourself. Let me "redpill" you with this fact.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, pedophile monkey.

Yes, it only matters the outcome, and yes your analogy was reductive. The Europeans and the Inca were both advanced human cultures.

The notion that one is superior to the other is laughable, especially when the better one loses. If Euros are so shit, then the entire world lost to a bunch of losers. Maybe you're playing the wrong game.

where on earth did you get that 15 million estimate from, that's utter horseshit.

>your "Empire" becomes irrelevant
yeah after a few centuries LOL

the real argument is might makes right

>advanced human cultures
Europeans had 40000+ years of settlement on europe. Amerindians had 15000 years.

Yet amerindians reached the bronze age in less time than eurangutans.

>better one loses
That's why I compared a gorilla with an unarmed human. Who is superior between the human and the gorilla?

>Bunch of losers
The facts are there. Incas developed more technology than eurangutans in less time and amerindians even had some better technology than middle-ages eurangutanland.

If we compare amerindians with an european Chronological system of reference, amerindians reached the bronze age in 25000BC and europeans met them in 23500BC.

History demonstrates Inca superiority. Get over it, chimpo.

They even had a plan to take over Japan. While fighting in the med with the barbary pirates, the other European nations and starting the conquest of the Maya cities and still getting a grip of the philipines.

>complaining about Chinese cartoons on his Burmese basket weaving forum

Several years after the diseases entered the continent and were wiping out the natives.

>Europeans had 40000+ years of settlement on europe


90% of the Europeans lives in Europe since 3000 AD (Corded Ware and Bell Beakers)

Literally all conquered and copied the greek-roman culture, skipping most of human progress, yet still more time spent developing compared to amerindians.

The most ancient culture that could influence south-amerindiana were just some decades earlier before the rest.

Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Aaand here it comes the chimp-out...

The same did the incas with the moche and moche descendents or the Aztecs with the Toltecs.

*Nazca.

>Literally all conquered and copied the greek-roman culture

Dumbest post ever

Celts were famed for their iron smithing, and Vikings for their steel smithing

The very breastplates and swords of the Greeks and Roman are in fact Celtic btw

So you're saying that even if I've never played football, before I am better than a professional footbal player as long as I'm better than they were when they first started playing?

He is also ignoring all the bronze age cultures before the collapse and after it, but he is trying to troll after all. At least is better than another african thread.

>smithing
i mean blacksmithing

>moche descendants
Moche didn't trade with the aztecs nor the mayas. They traded with with west mexican culturea and gave them metal-working.
Also the differenc of occupation between those two ethnic groups is less than 500 years.
So you tried to point out the knowledge they got from anatolain and middle-eastesners that settled before 40000BC?
Bronze age europe? When did it happen?
Nope. I'm comparing a gorilla with an unarmed human.

The Bronze Age societies of Europe, like 5200 year old agean one,when the trade networks from Skandinavia to Egypt started a f ew years later or the first true Euro cities of the balkans/central Europe before the bronze proper (using copper tools etc).

>People still feed the Incatard

Moor detected.

Say the mestizo withe inferiority complex.

They did it because they could, and because they wanted to. It was a necessary evil that provided Latin America with a higher standard of civilization.

>projecting
Here we are stating facts. Why is the moor so buttblasted about a single fact?

Its moops you idiot

>t. pablo delgado del la tacos, killer of indian babies and rapist of indian ladies.

What are the remains of the helladic bronze age phase?

>t. pablo doritos del la tacos, killer of babies and gold slut.

>helladic bronze age phase
In Greece and the agean? There are diggin sites everywhere.

Shieet. Why did they stop using that?

How was the copper extraction? Was it imposed by the state, or did the artisans managed to get it through trade.

Trade. They stopped using it, because they learnt Iron during the Dark Age

Hmm... Did they get influenced mainly by egyptians or is there another culture that gave them such armour ideas?

Also, are there hints of what exactly happened on the dark ages? I heard that the population abandoned the old hierarchy systems and cities and adopted another one. How did that happen?

Trade, and the real problem was Tin, very hard to find, only a few places like Wales had it, so an Atlantic-Med trade web was formed. You can find Egyptians bronze swords in Skandinavia sites for example (and even loltastic flint swords imitating them) but something happened than not even historian agree and all those societies collapsed, specially the med ones like the hitties than rivaled Egypt ,got rekt hard.
Some larpers with bronze armors, at those times they had some wild desings.

Egypt was big, but there were a lot of other civilizations, so it's hard to pin down the influences, and after the collapse of the URSS a lot of archeological sites opened and shed some light in those times (Before or after the collapse), there is plenty of literature if it interest you a determined place and time, the problem it's finding it in a language you understand.
Minoans or Miceneans, even being a stone throw of Egypt had a very diferentiate culture for example.

All of history boils down to luck. Better to be lucky than good.

Pizarro and 12 random dudes conquered the entire Inca empire alone. Imagine how pathetic they were irl for that to happen

I honestly hope you that your house catches on fire tonight while you're sleeping and you can't escape. You're so fucking annoying and uneducated and you post this shit in every thread about any pre Columbian civilization and it details and ruins the thread. Stop WE WUZing you disgusting piece of trash. I hope you die of smallpox like all the natives.

Better Spaniards then Arabs
Incas would have been Halal slaughtered lol

I think he isn't even peruvian, it's only stirring shit.

Wrong. Natives beat the Inca. Eurangutans just kept backstabbing each other, even their own kind hehehe

>100 failed attempts of goalshifting
>still cannot prove Inca superiority wrong
I'm here just to clarify a single fact. Why can't eurangutans into deduction?

This is my first post in this thread, I haven't tried to prove anything. I'm not even European. I just actually hate you. You derail and ruin threads that actually have potential. You're a tumor on the board. I hope that you get in a car crash, and then your seatbelt locks up with your gas tank on fire.

>Wrong. Natives beat the Inca
No lmao. Natives were stomped by an army composed by Pizarro and his pub buddies. Then Pizarro played the Incas against each other until they collapsed. Truly the most pathetic way to be conquered to be honest

you ever wondered what started it all?

Wrong. Literally all archeological findings demonstrate that all batlles except the last ones were between natives and several 'spanish' chroniclers that affirmed that the the spanish fought with gunpowder and horses were mostly made up. Spanish fought when their reinfocements and main aid came from Spain.

Incas were still fighting againd superior numbers all the time.

Try again, monkey.

The empire must not have been that great if it took two seconds for every other tribe in the empire to chimp out and betray you.

>60-80% deaths in a huge administrative system of official-dependent regime
>civil war decimating the imperial guard and dividing the nobles
>huge population tribes still threatening the empire
>spanish getting to the inca by luck just before he returns to the capital to solve the rebel problems
Incas were superior to europeans. History demonstrates it. Deal with it, subhuman.

>their reinfocements and main aid came from Spain.
200 men? Yeah Incas were a meme that got cucked to death by a bunch of pig feeders

>solve the rebel problems
But that wouldn't happen. If you violently put down a rebellion it only tends to make the subjugated people angrier. A good example is the Easter uprising. Or ask the Assyrians how it went for them.

this is what your average yuropean """Person""" looks like. Incans should have won

Wrong. The skirmishes only consisted on kidnapping the Inca before returning to the capital and killing unarmed civilians.
After the reorganization of the nobility with the neo Inca state the reinforcements already came alongside the settlers and the numerous tribes fought against the decimated Incas.
Rebellions were prevented with the loss of identity from each village and city through the migration of families and the rupture of tribe relations. The massive deaths and the lack of officials controlling the empire in war times several recently conquered cultures rebelled. Also the main threat was the Chancas and the tribes that the spanish allied with.