What are your opinions on the theories of their being a somewhat technologically advanced civilization(s?) before the current interglacial period
>inb4 Atlantis was purely alagorical
Ice Age Humans
Bentley Rogers
Other urls found in this thread:
dailymail.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
news.bbc.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
dailymail.co.uk
newyorker.com
en.wikipedia.org
moco-choco.com
twitter.com
Adrian Long
do you mean like sorceror kings
William Moore
The evidence is hidden underneath of the antarctic wall.
>inb4 the world is round
Nicholas Roberts
The world is clearly donut shaped, you heretic
Anthony Wood
In that vein, yes.
Shittones of habitable coastline was submerged at the end of the previous glacial period. There's just too many pieces that sort of stick out too much to fit in with current thoughts on human history.
Case in point, megaliths submerged to over 100feet.
Kevin Johnson
Why do people always go to these fucking rocks off japan? THEY'RE NOTHING! They dont even look habitable.
There are better examples, use them.
Easton Sanders
not really possible to advance beyond stone age hunter gatherers until agriculture was possible.
Gavin Reyes
You're right. What about Dwarka off the coast of western India?
They don't have to be habitable, could be a religious site.
Henry King
Bingo. Or the plethora of confirmed carved megaliths found in the in oceans all over. Youngish is just a volcanic formation of basalt.
Matthew Reyes
Not even for a predominantly maretime civilization? The problem is so much of the prime land is submerged now, so even if there was primitive cultivation it would be almost impossible to tell.