Why did Nazis hate the KKK?

Because it was American.

>judaized and negrified

youtube.com/watch?v=LWNc2NwkW74

It's funny how the Japanese and the Germans who had never set foot on American soil all thought Americans were lazy, borderline balkanized, moral degenerates and incapable of putting up a fight, whereas those who had been to America such as Isoroku Yamamoto and Tadamichi Kuribayashi admired Americans for their industriousness, generosity, and knew they would make for a savage and ruthless foe if provoked.

Except he wasn't. The Indian Wars were a half-milennia long free-for-all where alliances between Native Americans and those of European descent (Canadians, Americans, Mexico's ruling class etc.) changed by the season. There was never an organized conspiracy to kill all Native Americans as the Nazis had with Generalplan Ost and the Final Solution. As for blacks, slavery was such a torment on the American conscious that it culminated in a war that was devastating not just on the physical level, but on a psychic one as well. The NSDAP never had any moral dilemma with savagely oppressing, enslaving, and outright murdering those they deemed inferior.

>There was never an organized conspiracy to kill all Native Americans as the Nazis had with Generalplan Ost and the Final Solution
California certainly rode that borderline

>Except he wasn't. The Indian Wars were a half-milennia long free-for-all where alliances between Native Americans and those of European descent (Canadians, Americans, Mexico's ruling class etc.) changed by the season. There was never an organized conspiracy to kill all Native Americans as the Nazis had with Generalplan Ost and the Final Solution. As for blacks, slavery was such a torment on the American conscious that it culminated in a war that was devastating not just on the physical level, but on a psychic one as well. The NSDAP never had any moral dilemma with savagely oppressing, enslaving, and outright murdering those they deemed inferior.
It's not perceived that way though. It's perceived as the murican manifest destiny where they kept settling west slaughtering any injuns in their way.

It was drawn by a Norwegian cartoonist in occupied Norway.

Mass killings of Indians were generally carried out at a local level, by a variety of groups, and were generally retaliatory in nature (Indians kill a few white settlers, the local posse or cavalry detachment shoots a few hundred of them in return). It never mass liquidation planned and ordered by a central authorities. The closest we have to that is the Indian Removal Act of the 1830 and even then, it was enacted only after bitter debate in Congress and President Jackson believed he was doing so to avert a war between Natives and white settlers that would result in the extinction of the Natives.

>they kept settling west slaughtering any injuns in their way

Well the sheer number of white Americans West of the Mississippi with Native American ancestry (myself included) would say otherwise.

>Under US sovereignty, after 1848, the Indian population plunged from perhaps 150,000 to 30,000 in 1870 and reached its nadir of 16,000 in 1900
No user, California was the only state to really implement the kill em all approach, disease does not explain those losses when they'd been exposed to them for almost 400 years and nor does "local posses"

>disease does not explain those losses when they'd been exposed to them for almost 400 years and nor does "local posses"

Starvation from the loss of the hunter-gather lifestyle and deliberate neglect by American authorities would though. Also, the Native population was already dropping at an alarming rate even prior to the Gold Rush and California's annexation by the United States.

>The first (factor) was the food supply... The second factor was disease. ...
>A third factor, which strongly intensified the effect of the other two, was the social and physical disruption visited upon the Indian. He was driven from his home by the thousands, starved, beaten, raped, and murdered with impunity. He was not only given no assistance in the struggle against foreign diseases, but was prevented from adopting even the most elementary measures to secure his food, clothing, and shelter. The utter devastation caused by the white man was literally incredible, and not until the population figures are examined does the extent of the havoc become evident.

I'm not saying what happened to Natives in California wasn't a genocide and an affront to civilization, it most certainly was. But I would not compare it to the Third Reich's plan to systematically annihilate the Jews and Slavic peoples through deliberate and coordinated mass murder. It would be appropriate be to compare it to the Armenian Genocide, NKVD "population transfers", or post-war mass deportations of ethnic Germans though, which were also a repulsive assault on all human decency.

Because the NSDAP knew that the KKK was funded by the Jews to undermine and overthrow Christianity in Europe and to discredit Christianity as well. The KKK hated Christianity and hated Jesus as well. The fuhrer and savior of Europe Hitler put a stop to that.

at what time of the war was this made?

trying to show the US as hypocritical to their supposed values
they might also think the kkk is crude ruffians and less orderly and spiritual
as desperate war propaganda it's less focused on ideological conformacy as to effecting minds

As another user said, this is applicable to most of the westward expansion. But California can be very reasonably called an intentional genocide.

KKK was an exclusive American white supremacist group. If you weren't an American, you could only be an honorary member.

how's life on the Rez

Did you not read the "perceived" part?

It was made late in the war by a Norwegian cartoonist so it was probably just random negative things about the US he could think up.

I wouldn't know. Never been to one.

I did, I'm saying that perception is wrong.

>Generalplan Ost
>real

Because Hitler was not a White supremacist. Also, the Klan hates Catholics an Hitler was Catholic.

This,

Hitler specifically believed in the advancement of Germans, regardless of whether or it not it came at other Europeans' expense.

>n Hitler was Catholic.

Hitler didn't hate black people. On the contrary, he acknowledged they were physically superior to the europeans because of their ancestry living in the jungle.

He merely believed each nation should live in its own land. He didn't believe in going around killing blacks because they were black.

But American media tells me that they were best buddies and would often go on scenic walks with each other

>Nazis fighting americans
>america treats blacks like shit

Nazis had no beef with blacks, their enemy was the american government, which was hypocritical for denouncing German policy on jews when they treated blacks far worse.

...

So his argument was because America is evil the nazis are justified in being evil? I don't get it.

Hitler banned "human zoos" while they were still legal in Belgium in the 1940's, zoos where essentially people would come and gawk at blacks from africa. popularresistance.org/deep-racism-the-forgotten-history-of-human-zoos/

When Jesse Owens travelled to Berlin, he could freely use all the hotels, shake hands with Germans, use front entrances of Hotels and stay in the same hotels as whites. He had no such luxury in his home country of America.

Owens received a congratulatory telegraph from Hitler, but was snubbed by his own president roosevelt.

The only time Hitler said anything negative about blacks was when he spoke about the Jews bringing negroes to the rhine to created bastardised negro-germans of mixed blood. Even in this he doesn't say anything negative about blacks, he merely uses it to attack Jews and say they are trying to dilute and bastardise the german race.

>believing forgeries by (((martin borman))) and (((albert speer)))

because they are mongrel Ameritards and Hitler despised those race obsessed Americucks

The problem with you retards is that you rely on gullible idiots listening to everything you say and not fact checking a single one of your claims
snopes.com/jesse-owens-and-hitler-handshake/

No, his argument was that the americans had no right to judge him when they were themselves doing the same thing

Read your own fucking fact check you mongoloid

>The man who actually snubbed Owens was President Franklin D Roosevelt. After the 1936 Berlin Olympics, only the white athletes were invited to see and meet Roosevelt. Owens – the most successful athlete at the games – bemoaned that he “wasn’t invited to the White House to shake hands with the President”.

>Owens did say that he felt snubbed, but not by Hitler. The snub came from United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who did not extend an invitation to Owens to visit the White House:

> “Owens was merely led below the honor box where he smiled and bowed and Herr Hitler gave him a friendly little Nazi salute; the sitting down one with the arm bent.”

Your fact check only discredits a fake photograph of Hitler and Owens, but confirms everything about the post.

That's the thing though, the picture is obviously depicting them as being immoral for doing that same thing the nazis did, so while you can call them hypocrites you're left with the problem that you're also depicting them as bad for doing the same thing you're doing, which means you're calling yourself bad too. It's not just a matter of "you're complaining about my cannabis habit when you smoke tobacco" where the hypocrisy is about something morally neutral (i.e. you can point out hypocrisy in this case without saying that either tobacco smoking or cannabis smoking are immoral) since the political comic / propaganda picture is clearly depicting this behavior as sinister / immoral.

What's far worse than being gassed

the intended audience of this piece of propaganda aren't hardcore nazis

The Ku Klux Klan hated the nazis because they saw the nazi ideology as foreign. Many racists in the US hated the nazis because they saw it as a weird foreign ideology.

The yanks are a very reactionary and nationalistic people. American troops stationed in the UK during WW2 tried to enforce segregation in towns they were stationed in. Even today America is the most Religious and reactionary country in the world.

*western world, i meant

damn he was right

Snopes is a site for vegan redditards kek

That user said nothing about the handshake, you fucking nigger. He said that Owens felt better treated by Hitler than he did by his own president; this is an indisputable fact because the man said this himself

>American troops stationed in the UK during WW2 tried to enforce segregation in towns they were stationed in.
interesting. source?

Dope pic

Hitler was anti christian aswell.

They also dropped pro-Islam flyers on French auxiliaries from North Africa.

Just basic divide and conquer shit utterly divorced from Nazi ideology. Ye gaze upon the artefacts of expedience and imagine a deeper meaning where the creator had none.

Blues and jazz was outlawed in Germany due to being negermusik.
There were huge posters in the streets about this.

>Using the promise of shitty prison food as a lure to convince soldiers to defect
>from the most well-fed army of the war
nice one Hans

Lol