Why do stormtards and libtards alike pretend like Hitler was some racist white nationalist...

If you can't draw parallels between national socialism and white nationalism, I'm not sure what to tell you.

It's even worse when they show pictures of modern Germany as a proof that a victory of the guy who started an unrelated war around 75 years earlier would've fixed everything.

Or when they wonder if real WWII veterans regret fighting for the "wrong" side. Yeah because all those 90 year old British veterans dream about getting invaded and occupied by a foreign aggressor.

He didn't see arabs as non-white, nobody did, the "whites are only blond euros" bit is post 911 autism

Bullshit.
Yeah, my great grandfather did infact say that he didn't like fighting Germans and how do you work out that the Brits would have been invaded and occupied had they not joined the war?

Did your great grandfather mean that it was wrong to fight Germany, or did he mean that he didn't like being in the trenches? Is your surname Mosley?

French were invaded and the same thing applies to them. There are pics that juxtapose scenes from "peaceful" occupation and some riots in modern Paris. Some Canadians or other might've felt that the war was far away and they didn't feel like dying there but I can't imagine anyone not wishing to defeat one of the two main aggressors of the war in Europe.

I'm not even mentioning countries east to Germany. Those trigger both nazis and commies.

I agree then there's the Romeboo posting including related Byzaboo, Carthageboo, and Celtboo threads and the eternal "Why-communis(t/m)?"
I'd like more discussion on functional aspects and workings of history.

He said he didn't like killing Germans and that we'd be better off speaking German than following our current path. He didnt seem to have any issue with fighting Italians or Japanese tho. Also not a brit

The French were invaded because they made war on the Germans.

Your great grandaddy is a bit of a moron. Or maybe just senile.

Well actually Germany first invaded their allies.
Nothing excuses them not helping them. Perhaps it was a dumb decision to wage war on somebody and then do nothing but Germany initiated the aggression. Not that Hitler would have anything against settling the score with the French anyway but I don't know if he wanted to swallow the entire country. The Hossbach memorandum doesn't tell us that.

>he was a German nationalist who supported non-whites across the world against white imperialism

This is neo-Nazi propaganda

He's dead now but he was in sound mind.

And I would love to talk about really cool things like history of science and exploration.
But the threads about it die quickly. Let's be honest. Rome and WWII are like giant blockbusters of history.

Citation needed.

The allies alliance with Poland was simply an ultimatum to Germany. The French only support it because they wanted war. Had they remained neutral, they might have been invaded later but I'm sure the Brits wouldn't have been in any real danger

People can discuss what they want, maybe instead of bitching you should make a thread on a topic that interests you.

France gave up because they didn't want war. They were exhausted and shell-shocked after the Great War.

I think even the French army was really old because so many people died in WWI.

Although Hitler couldn't have invaded Britain in 1940 and he genuinely wanted to conclude Anglo-German peace negotiations so he could turn East, there's no guarantee Hitler wouldn't have eventually turned on them. He had repeatedly broken promises on Czechoslovakia, Poland etc.

Not him, but it's pretty clear in mein kampf that he deems every other race a threat, and expansionism/colonialism by superior races as good.
>If a nation confines itself to 'internal colonization' while other races are perpetually increasing their territorial annexations all over the globe, that nation will be forced to restrict the numerical growth of its population at a time when the other nations are increasing theirs. This situation must eventually arrive. It will arrive soon if the territory which the nation has at its disposal be small. Now it is unfortunately true that only too often the best nations--or, to speak more exactly, the only really cultured nations, who at the same time are the chief bearers of human progress--have decided, in their blind pacifism, to refrain from the acquisition of new territory and to be content with 'internal colonization.' But at the same time nations of inferior quality succeed in getting hold of large spaces for colonization all over the globe. The state of affairs which must result from this contrast is the following: Races which are culturally superior but less ruthless would be forced to restrict their increase, because of insufficient territory to support the population, while less civilized races could increase indefinitely, owing to the vast territories at their disposal. In other words: should that state of affairs continue, then the world will one day be possessed by that portion of mankind which is culturally inferior but more active and energetic.

>join war that you've been itching for since Czechoslovakia
>give up in like 6 weeks cause you didn't really want war
Just lol
There's no guarantee in anything.

The French had no war spirit and the way the behaved in 1939 and 1940 shows that.

No. They thought they could hide behind their forts and were wrong.

did you fucking readed mein kampf????

lmao so he's basically saying Anglos, Francs, and Russians are barbaric subhumans?

This goy knows what he's talking about. The defeat suffered by the French in 1940 was no where near the losses suffered by the Russians in 1941; the Russians lost several orders of magnitude more armies and equipment during Unternehmen Barbarossa than the French did during Fall Gelb.

The difference is that after initial their loss of divisions, the French surrendered; whereas the Russians just called up more men, and more men, and more men.

Pretty much the reverse of what happened in world war 1

Sometimes the meme is more important than the reality for an ideology. White nationalism latched onto Hitler early on, mostly to draw on his beliefs of a parasitic enemy standing in the way of greatness. Everything else filtered in because of the aesthetic appeal of German eugenics and symbols to American White nationalists.