Communism is bad

>state capitalism is bad*

...

State capitalism is making China into a world power and guided the Asian tigers into becoming developed countries

Thanks to Deng Xiaoping.

>Sharp increase after the Soviet-Afghan war ends

At least they left the maoutism now.

>Uses estimates that include the capitalistic informal economy (aka black market) for the Soviet period
>Capitalism BTFO
What did he mean by this?

>Remember that time your country was a world power that rivaled the USA and Western Europe?
>Do you miss it?

These polls are always bullshit, the USSR could have been an absolute monarchy and Russians would today say it was great. They miss their empire and international prestige/fear not communism. Brits are still polling at feeling pride over their Empire at 59%. Its literally the same phenomenon.

Russia is still a world power.

Yeah, but compared to the USSR, a country that could go toe to toe with the US, it's nothing.

>Literally Mexico with Nukes
>World Power
Pick one.

>Communism ruins the economy
>communism collapses
>capitalism picks up the pieces
>"I-it's capitalism's fault!!!!"
I bet you think Obama caused the recession too

I really don't care what institutionalized Russians think about it. The entire eastern block is glad it's gone and many Russians as well including some historians who are now seen as traitors by the government.

Russia remains an oligarchic shithole so of course some people who are used to worshipping their own killers look back to the days where they at least mattered and could subjugate other nations.

That's because the Cold War world was bipolar. Today it's more or less multipolar.
>unquestionable relevancy on international matters
>strong army
>gigantic nuclear arsenal
>able to project power on foreign countries if needed (Georgia, Ukraine, Syria)

Russia is a world power.

Its a regional power, it can only really trouble nations next to it. To be a world power you need to have the ability to project your force globally. The difference confuses people because Russia is so large it seems like it can project power globally.

Truth is the furthest they've gone in recent times is Syria. The USSR was meddling in Africa and South America which made them a world power. The Russian Federation can't do that.

>Its a regional power
Obama please go, you're not the president anymore. Also you accused Russia of bringing Trump into office, that's not what regional powers do.

fuck off and die you commie dick sucking piece of shit

>Completely unsourced

Mhm. Sure is getting tankie up in here.

Communism is only bad for the elites, the plutocrats the Rothschilds, George Soros, and the bankers. For the rest communism is for the people and is a liberating force under communism the workers on the mean of production, there is no exploitation like there is under capitalism, the people live free and productive lives, the state protects the welfare of the people, and the standard of living is good, unemployment does not exist, and there is no crime to speak of. And best of all there is no Rothschild Bank either.

>communism
>state

>soviet countries
>workers owning the means of production
>no exploitation
>no plutocrats

>21st century
>obsessed with rothschilds

Tankie /pol/tard pls.

About average for the 60s or 70s, and things started stagnating in Russia around the 1970s.

The Communist Party, the nomenklatura in the Soviet Union, are the exploiters under communism. Everyone suffers under communist command economies except those elites that act with impunity and weird the unlimited powers of the state like feudal lords over the serf workers. Everyone can prosper economic nominally if they can exchange their capital, time, labor, and skill by CONSENT rather than COMMAND from the top.

Here we can harken back to St.Thomas Aquinas' theory of subsidiarity, which postulates that efficiency is achieved by delegating decision making to the lowest levels. Obviously the consent economy conforms to this theory better than the Stalinist, Maoist, Fidelista, or Kimist 5 year economic mandate from heaven.

He literally gave you the deffinition and there is a big difference between of a possible disinformation campaign and military intervention

...

>efficiency is achieved by delegating decision making to the lowest levels
Sounds like you're a commie.

russian communism is just a rebranded russian imperialism, fuck them

“The difference between communism and capitalism is that in capitalism, man exploits man. In communism, it’s the other way around.”

Now show the graph of GDP of countries enslaved into communism by the USSR lol

Russoposting banned when?

>Rothschild

This old man disagree with you

>The entire eastern block is glad it's gone and many Russians as well
Suuuuure

I really don't care what institutionalized Russians think about...

All war crimes were denied, they believed it was a time of glory great victories and back when everybody was afraid of them. I wonder if Baltic republics wanted to give away their freedom.
Or eastern block countries.
No, because Soviet Union was a violent aggressor ever since 1939 (or even 1919 if we got back that far). We all spit on its grave.

90s Russia wasn't capitalist country, it was a Jewish oligarchy. 7 Jewish oligarchs literally controlled 50% of Russia's economy during that period, they were given control over huge amount of Russia's natural resources for virtually nothing in return by people who were responsible for privatization program, most of whom, "coincidentally", also happened to be Jewish.

>I wonder if Baltic republics wanted to give away their freedom.
Well, they democratically expressed their opinion

Oh, geez. I thought all those revolutions in 1991 that resulted in independence of these countries were real.
I guess I have to trust in honesty of Soviet democracy.

...

...

...

Post hoc ergo proctor hoc fallacy detected.
Argument is invalid.
Please try again.