>at least somebody noticed they exist tier Switzerland Bulgaria Serbia Czechia
>nobody gives a fuck tier everybody else
>(list is based on general historical relevance, including but not limited to: Amount of land owned, amount of people ruled, trading importance, length of rule over said areas, scientific and cultural progress that came from said country, amount of scientists, inventors and great artists produced, all compared to the relative size of said nation to achieve equality, and on timeline from ~600 AD to current time)
Hunter Jackson
>be successor of Rome >get overrun by niggnogs and muslims
Thomas Richardson
Just like the original Rome?
Sebastian Scott
More /int/ garbage on my board.
Brandon Gomez
>Britain
>get lucky, create the largest empire in history >lose almost all of it in 50 year
The British Empire was Mongol tier. Hell even the Mongol Empire lasted longer.
Bentley Rogers
but muh Congo
Camden Brooks
well Hungary could be still had an empire tier
Mason Stewart
pottery
Jacob Martin
>Comparing UK to France Maximum KEK
A country that cannot win land wars by itself against another european power cannot be a successor or Rome.
>Germany Impressive
Jacob Powell
>successor of Rome tier Finland
>impressive tier Turkey Germany Poland(-Lithuania) Georgia Austria Greece
>still had an empire tier Russia Britain France Netherlands
>disappointment tier Serbia Italy Spain
>at least somebody noticed they exist tier Portugal Sweden Denmark Hungary Switzerland Bulgaria Czechia
>non-country tier Belgium FYROM Bosnia
Fixed that for you
Parker Hill
google Kalmar.
Jack Moore
For a good laugh?
Cooper Bennett
>hundreds of years of complex diplomacy, deception and wars >get lucky wew lad
Landon Powell
Wait, kiddo, UK has somewhat influence in the XIVth and XVth centuries due to the HYW and then again since the XIXth Century. The rest of the time they were in their island being mediocre. Granted their jump with the industrialization is amazing, but that greentext is a rather romanticized delusion.
Colton Smith
No, user, you don't understand > based on general historical relevance See? This makes it all okay
Ethan Foster
>disappointment tier >Hungary yeah...
Andrew Howard
True, it may have been the Kingdom of Hungary, but there were still like 5-6 different ethnic groups
Adrian Kelly
who could be behind this post?
Matthew King
>everything important happened here tier: Italy
Jordan Turner
>countries = ethnic groups I hate brainlets.
Ethan Rivera
>turkey >impressive
Joshua Barnes
>what is the finnish empire lmao more like rome is the successor of binland
shit, i skipped over #2, france is 2, germany 3, etc.
Adam Ramirez
Portugal should be over the G*rms desu, the controlled a bigger slice of the world, last country to say goodbye to its colonies, much more impressive military record and history.
G*rms are a disappointment
Brayden White
>trading importance, length of rule over said areas, scientific and cultural progress... amount of scientists, inventors and great artists >Italy a disappointment It literally excelled at all of those criteria.
Jacob Young
not because of ethnicity but it had bohemia under its crown, personal unions with poland, HRE emperor as king, rightful successor of the crown of Naples
it was a big player until 16th century so disappointment tier is kinda ok? shadow of former self
Jeremiah Young
Tbh Finland has the best claim to being the successor of Rome
