Childhood is idolizing the Union

Childhood is idolizing the Union.
Adulthood is realizing the Confederation made more sense.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=SWN96Jgd-hM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Senility is realizing America should have been part of the British Empire
youtube.com/watch?v=SWN96Jgd-hM

Enlightenment is realizing Argentina is the best country in America

Dementia is realizing that the true Roman Empire fell in 1533

No, that's just being a wog

The true roman empire fell in 1922

>not 612 BC

I started singing the battle hymn of the union and ended singing old abe lies sick

not in 30,000 BC

in what way did it make more sense

This

Bring the good old bugle, boys, we'll sing another song,
Sing it with a spirit that will start the world along.
Sing it as we used to sing it, 50,000 strong,
While we were marching through Georgia.

the union forever, although the men of the confederacy should be respected as capturing american spirit, albeit in a misguided way

Literally the other way around.

I support the Confederacy in everything except Slavery.

Slavery is the greatest evil this country has endured, just look, it gave us niggers

The Confederacy's secession made perfect sense though. Morally questionable, but they were legally in the right to secede.

intended for

Reminder that Lincoln never wanted to deport blacks, and was shot for advocating (limited) black suffrage in his final address.

The death every centrist deserves

Jeff Davis rode a dapple grey and Abe Lincoln rode a mule

Hurrah, hurrah, we bring the jubilee!
Hurrah, hurrah, the flag that makes you free!

So you support the Great Value Union?

the confederacy were banana-republic tier as far as government goes. They were unbelievably corrupt, and unable to manage finances or logistics to any real degree.

had they "won" they'd just be a puppet state of either Union, French, or British financiers.

yet Lincoln could actually have decisions carried out, while Jefferson Davis struggled to get confederate legislatures to agree on things like strategy or logistical decisions.

oh boy, here we go again...

ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Articles of Confederacy was a poop that was way too vague and open for future abuse

Getting rid of it made our Union stronger and ultimately a world power
Papa Fed has to slap a bitch once in a while to get ourselves in line so we're too busy competing globally instead of California or New York

Maybe they had a legal right to secede but they didn't have a legal right to attack federal property.

Sherman did nothing wrong

>(You)

I agree.
After the war he lead Southern brigades deep into the Dakota territory and slaughtered tens of thousands of Indians to make way for European settlers.
A true American that will never have their actions judged by modern sensibilities :^)

Non-Burger here.
Remove the border states (except for Oklahoma) then extend the Arizona territory up to its northern border and those are some aesthetic borders.

And sanity is realising that they were little more than traitors, slavers, and fools.

Confederacy was one of the most evilest regimes in human history, on par with nazi Germany desu.

>moral relativism
With the Haitian Massacre taking place at the beginning of the 19th century, how difficult is it to accept that the Southern states were afraid of the potential ramifications of abolishing slavery?

Wrong. Lincoln was planning colonization of blacks to africa as late as 1861-62.

>M-muh black and white

Back to /pol/.

Old age is realizing THAT IN THE END IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER

lol I wish

They may have been even worse.

>The economy was built on vicious and murderous slave labor. The slave labor camps in the south producing cotton, they would have impressed the Nazis. They were quite efficient. Efficiency was in fact increased, productivity was increased rapidly through the technology of a bullwhip and a pistol.

>muh states rights
>muh agricultural necessity/most southerners didn't own slaves
>muh war of northern aggression
>muh renaming battles
>muh southern honor/pride
>muh lost cause
>muh romanticized revisionism

Is there anything more disgusting in historical study than Southern apologists?

>the Confederation

>slave labour camps
Lol, fuck off, retard.

Your swollen, throbbing anus and pathetic level of historical knowledge, maybe?

Why would you characterize the Yankees as Micks when the South objectively had Scottish, Irish and all kind of hinterland English faggots who all had Celtic blood? In fact tne North was mostly properly Germanic, as in German, Southern English and Scandinavian.

still waiting on an answer to this

The majority of Yankee soldiers were Irish and German immigrants. White Southerners have primarily English ancestry which is so old they simply declare themselves as "American" on census forms. Southerners are the only true Americans.

>White Southerners have primarily English ancestry
More like potato nigger ancestry. Read McWhiney.

>dude does nothing but attempt to pay his respects to his ancestors who died fighting for a cause outside of their control
>he is somehow a villain

People who sperg about muh Confederates while whitewashing the founders.

I agree

>t. Cletus

>paying respect to your ancestors by LARPing instead of preserving the memory of them specifically

If your ancestors hated the war so much, they wouldn't want you glorifying it. This guy, and people like him, aren't villains, they're just willfully stupid.

Encouraging voluntary emigration = Deportation
"Sending them back" is literally Stormfag fanfiction.

>More like potato nigger ancestry. Read McWhiney.
>Ulster Scots are ethnically irish
Goddamn this board is so fucking worthless

>"Sending them back" is literally Stormfag fanfiction.
It was really just a common sentiment at the time.

That's true.... wtf I hate slavery now!?

Is /pol/ just a word for anything you don't like? That poster wasn't even saying anything racist, and yet you sperged out. So which is it, /pol/ is just a word for people you think are retarded, or for your nadsi boogeyman?