How can Central Asia be made great again?

How can Central Asia be made great again?
Is it a problem there how the region is divided into basically a few kingdoms in all but name?

Redraw the borders along ethnic lines

Iirc that's what the soviets tried to do

>muh ethnic lines
Nation staters are cancer.

Make the Silk Route great again.

Thats literally the opposite of what they did.

>Again

It's over m8. Gunpowder killed it.

Peacefully transfer all Turks in Anatolia to this region.

>Surronded by Russia China and Iran and Turkey
They are screwed unless they unite which is impossible

>Turkey
Where the fuck do You see Turkey on this map mate

>what kind of borders do you want senpai

Can't blame them. For the longest time the Ferghana Valley was the only place that's not a shithole in Central Asia.

Did you really have to reply to every post

>Afghanistan is in central asia
It's not. It's a mix of MENA, Central and South Asia.
>Genocide all Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Kyrgyz-s, and Hazaras
Fuck off.

>it's a mix of
>MENA
In what fucking way? Iran is the last country in the middle east, is Indonesia part of MENA because it's majority Muslim? What about Bosnia? Fuck off
>central
Yes
>south
arguably yes, I'd consider the large provinces that border Pakistan more south asian (you know the niggered out p*shtun ones) but the country is predominantly central asian. It's like a crossroads between central and south

Yes

>In what fucking way? Iran is the last country in the middle east
The way their country is structured around Islam is very similar to the MENA world. There was also no 'Afghanistan' before Islam, just a bunch of warring tribes that were a mix of Zoroastrians, Hindus and Buddhists (majority buddhist tho).

It's not the same for countries like Indonesia or Bosnia.
>central
>south
>Yes
So you agree with me that it's all three?

Turkic Union, use the new nation's copious natural resources to establish itself as a world superpower.

#genghiswillriseagain

Pic for scale

You don't know what you're talking about.

It's a clusterfuck worse than Bosnia.
Don't tell me these borders are along ethnic lines.

Making an ethnic state there is a mistake, unless you go for Pan-Turanism/Pan-Turkism

Yeah, the borders aren't ethnic because it's impossible to do so. The Soviets TRIED, but it was never going to be a satisfying result because population spread doesn't follow reasonable looking borders.

The states are fine the way they are, what they need is bigger integration within themselves and their neighbors (specially with a country with access to the sea).

In a perfect word, a federated "Turkestan" would take part in an economic alliance with a non-Islamic Iran, a peaceful secular Afghanistan and a developing and progressive Pakistan. Or maybe just Russia.

>Yeah, the borders aren't ethnic because it's impossible to do so. The Soviets TRIED, but it was never going to be a satisfying result because population spread doesn't follow reasonable looking borders.
If the Soviets really tried they wouldn't care about the borders being continuous.
After all they were just subdivisions of the eternal Soviet Union, not separate states. Having lots of enclaves and exclaves wouldn't have mattered.

Aside from that
>In a perfect word, a federated "Turkestan" would take part in an economic alliance with a non-Islamic Iran, a peaceful secular Afghanistan and a developing and progressive Pakistan
What about Tajikistan?

>After all they were just subdivisions. Having lots of enclaves and exclaves wouldn't have mattered.
But it totally would have. Organizational subdivisions are just microcosms of political entities. Enclaves and exclaves would still have been a problem even if they were just jurisdictions.

And once again, what is even the point? Precisely if they're only organizational sub-divisions, it makes sense not to stress much about it. They did a decent job, all thing considered. The only thing I would have changed is having the clusterfuck in the middle of Ferghana Valley be a separate, more neutral entity.

>what about Tajikistan
It's largely Persian, but what about it? It's culture is more closely aligned to its ex-soviet neighbors and it's not like we're having Iran swallow Afghanistan just because it's got a large number of Persian-speakers.

Just make Turan already damnit.
Also add east turkestan to it which can only happen as china collapses.

Exterminate Turkics and replace their land with whites.

By China's OBOR project, and stay away from Roach's Turanism. This is your best shot, and probably your last.

This. These lands used to be populated by Indo-Europeans before the mongrel Turd scum took over and turned everything into a shithole. The Turkic khanates were still aping the Persians as late as early 20th century because they can't create anything on their own.

> we wuz pure noble aryan tocharians

do an eu but basically with turkic nations

Excluding Turkey and Azerbaijan?

>do an eu
that would make it more islamic than it already is

soviet legacy

To be great AGAIN you must have once been great.

wh*Te subhuman
if you ever touch Central Asia i'll personally rape your mother.

With 10cm erect "dick"? Good luck.

Turk = Dicklet

with my BBC, 22 cm long
your mother loves it.

Wouldn't that turn them into Chinese puppets?

We made you and we can unmake you too. Kazakhs and Turkmens should and will be gassed.

Turanism does not mean Pan-Turkism.

No they didn't.

Looks like they sort of took a crack at it honestly.

That's why there's a slash in there

Why? They let silk road pass through them like they did thousands years ago? Which was also the main reason they're once "great"?

Nevertheless, they already join in.