How do Buddhists reconcile the concept of No-Self with reeincarnation...

There's no reincarnation in buddhism.

There's rebirth (reincarnation implies "something that incarnates again"), and it's that of the mindstream, or parts of it (which are not the self) that identify with a body and situation and rebirth, keeping the "error" of self identification going

stop assuming Buddhism is coherent

It's not really "you" that is reincarnated, it's more that the "stuff" that makes up your mind is recycled into another mind. The goal is to free yourself from the endless recycling by achieving enlightenment and NOT reincarnating.

That's why Hindu philosophy is closer to the truth.

>implying it isn't the most coherent philosophy of all time

Eastern religions are garbage and filled with gaping holes in their worldviews.

hurr just live in balance cuz I said so even though I admit the universe is infinite and chaotic and there probably isn't a creator t. buddah

They are according to Chogyam Trungpa. Mental states that we live each day and at the moment of death, with such imagery being dependant upon our concepts of bliss and suffering

There's no actual reason nor evidence to believe the lokas are actual defined and structures places in some dimension.

Even some indian sadhus consider that the charnel ground can be a concept, with the modern depressive life in a soulless industrial metropoli being a smashan of our times

>implying the same can't be said about western religions

>Religions are garbage and filled with gaping holes in their worldviews.

FTFY

quick rundown on that guy? heaps of people seem to like him and his teachings seem appealing, but wasn't he a drunk and a sex pest??