Did Britain really contribute in WW2?

Did Britain really contribute in WW2?
Or was it mostly an American-Soviet victory?

America wouldn't even get the chance to join the war in Europe without Britain holding out until 1941

>American-Soviet
>American
topkek, that delusion

>implying we wouldnt just land directly on Northern German shore

t. buttravaged bongistani

> 80,000-120,000

For a 3 year span that is a tiny amount given the number of people in the UK in general.

In any case, due to losses in war, the british men already were trading up to begin with.

But yes I do in fact see what youre trying to do here op

>Land at the worst possible landing point
OK? I mean you already managed to get BTFO at Omaha while everyone else had a pretty fine time so makes sense

wrong

Are British men supposed to feel bad about Americans dating British women?

It's more a case of "Please fucking take them"

If that's such a great plan, why didn't you do it?

>posting literal Nazi propaganda

The absolute state.

>are British men supposed to feel bad about getting BTFO by Rommel in North Africa while American servicemen plow their wives at home?

You tell me, cuck

>British
>BTFO by Rommel

Lolwut?

Which war did Rommel win again? Do you often ponder how much more satisfying slavic penis was in Germany? Your "ironic" cuck folder must be huge.

why are americans so FAT and STUPID ?!?

easy there nigel, that's just the uhmerican in you getting butthurt.

They contributed with Turing intelligence.
Afterwards they rewarded him with chemical castration for his services.

this is cringey as fuck

>it's OK to break the law and be a massive security risk if you did good things previously

>it's OK to break the law
When the law is retarded it absolutely is.
>be a massive security risk
Mate he was processed years after they won WWII

>he thinks national security is only a thing during war time

Not like there was any international espionage going on following the war or anything, right?

Except that his research was purely academical and he published most of it, and wasn't involved with anything remotely militar at the time of his death.

>academics can't be spies

What the fuck is wrong with you? Are you genuinely trying to defend chemically castrating somebody for being gay? How far in the closet are you?

>Be american
>Have to post literal Nazi propaganda to feel better about your nationality

>Be Euro
>Can go to the US and get laid in 5 minutes

It was a product of its time. I can perfectly understand why the security services wouldn't want a secret computer expert mincing around at the start of the Cold War.

What do you think chemical castration actually involves?

Castration?

Not the actual removal of the balls, just drugs that decrease libido.

So you're a brainlet who hasn't the faintest idea what you're talking about? Good to know.

Fucking up his body with hormones and chemicals that not only makes him impotent, it produces a plethora of side effects.

And please do tell that "secret computer" research he was involved with. All the papers released decades after his death were just public research lines, he had nothing to do with military research.
At the time of his trial he was trying to crack up a biology problem.

>secret computer" research he was involved with.

Literally everything he did during the Second World War? He didn't magically forget all that stuff on VJ day.

>I don't know what the fuck Turing did in WWII
He wasn't a magic scientist that made weapons or computers. His involvement was cracking up the codes the nazis used to codify their messages.
The very moment he got a code and managed to deencrypt messages that same code became useless since the nazis stopped using it.

Who the fuck cared about the codes the Germans used 5 years after their defeat? By the very nature of a secret key it becomes useless after being used.
The computers he built or helped build were after the war and weren't military secrets.

And this without mentioning the fact that if he truly was processed for being a liability, that doesn't explain how castrating him chemically actually helped to solve that liability.
If they were afraid of him compromising secrets that he supposedly had, how did the estrogens and drugs solve that? Not only was he freed eventually, he was freed with more reasons to shit on Great Britain than before.
It's all bullshit, he was processed for being a homo and they didn't care he was practically a war hero.

>cracking up the codes the nazis used to codify their messages.

Oh is that all? Yeah, I see it now. No one would possibly be interested in a guy who's a proven expert in building decoding computers. So what if he was also a consultant for GCHQ. No one would possibly be interested in what was going on there.

Saying "I'm practically a war hero" doesn't get you out of breaking the law. He CHOSE the castration, instead of going to prison.

Lol did a British guy take your girlfriend yank?

>No one would possibly be interested in a guy who's a proven expert in building decoding computers
Building decoding computers, even at that time, was nothing special. The important stuff are the algorithms for decryption.

>Saying "I'm practically a war hero" doesn't get you out of breaking the law.
It actually does. And when his crime is laying with another consenting adult in the intimacy of his house then it certainly should.
>He CHOSE the castration, instead of going to prison.
If he was truly processed for being a security liability he wouldn't have a choice to begin with. What's the point of castrating him? Do tell how that solves the problem of him either colluding with Soviet spies or Soviet spies trying to steal his secrets. If they really thought that he was collaborating with the commies in any way they wouldn't have given him a way out. He was exhonerated for all his "crimes" decades later, when they admitted it was shameful bullshit.

Mad

BIG AMERICAN COCK

The absolute STATE of bongs ITT

Brits didn't do much to DEFEAT Germany, but that doesn't mean they didn't do anything.
They did an incredible job of defending themselves.

There is literally nothing wrong with the fact that their main pride is that they didn't get assfucked, since there really was no way they were ever going to win against Germany.

They didn't "hide on a rock", they held the rock and threw everything they had at those who came to threaten it.
Britain didn't beat Germany, Britain survived Germany. Which is more than we can say about France, despite France having a larger and arguably better army at the time.

>Britain didn't beat Germany, Britain survived Germany. Which is more than we can say about France, despite France having a larger and arguably better army at the time.

We all know it isnt Britain's army that saved Britain from invasion tho

I don't think Germany would have been able to mount a very effective invasion of Britain with literal barges.

>Did Britain really contribute in WW2?
Yes.
The British stopped a massive Japanese advance into India, as well as absolutely obliterate the European axis navies, allowing American troops to arrive in western Europe, as well as being the ones to transport them to Normandy.
They were the ones who defeated Germany's greatest general, Rommel, and held out against the Germans in time for the Americans to actually do something against the Germans.

Not to mention their extensive work with the resistance of France, since all of the conquered leaders came to Britain, they were able to set up plans to destroy supply trains and equipment in preparation for the D-Day landings.

Point is that comparing the invasion of France to the non-invasion of Britain is dumb since France had to face the fearsome Wehrmacht and the meh Luftwaffe when Britain only had to face the meh Luftwaffe and the garbage Kriegsmarine

If we give them a rating (Wehrmacht = 5/5, Luftwaffe = 2.5/5 and Kriegsmarine = 0.5/5), France faced a strength of 7.5/10 while Britain faced a strength of 3/10

Yes, it was really their navy and airforce. The point being that them standing up to Germany at every chance both defensively and diplomatically is worth commending.

Poland got invaded too, difference is Poland didn't immediately capitulate to the enemy.

And we see how that worked out
Government ran away instead of taking responsability for the defeat like Petain did in France, which resulted in German military administration of Poland and 10 millions dead civilians (compared to 200,000 for France)

BRAVO WLADYSLAW

The Germans would have killed them anyway, and they would have started killing the French if they got the chance.

Polish carried on fighting, France basically gave up.

This
Poland single-handedly saved Britain for the German air force and even took time to crack the enigma code
Be grateful, britshits

Can't this sub pick a middle ground between "Poland did absolutely nothing" and "Poland saved everyone".

>sub