He unironically uses the term "cultural marxism"

>marxists stopped being alpha revolutionaries and turned into cuckold whiners

sounds about right to me desu

>but isn't that what capitalism does already?
Yes, but the response from libertarians is that this is "crony capitalism" in the form of neo-liberals which is meant it be a combination of socialism and capitalism.

it's Aut-right,

[spoiler]because they're severely autistic get it?[/spoiler]

>Forgot which board he was posting on
>Other people are the autists

but that's stupid.

because as "Libertarians" they should be happy about destroying institutions and social structures, as these are things that hold people back, and allow for corrupt/hypocritical groups to fester/remain without merit.

>brainlets don't recognize they're the autistic ones.

you absolute patrician

>libertarianism == anarchism

>he unironically uses the term "cultural marxism"
>unironically using Adorno's criticism against these 'cultural marxists'
Every fucking time.

>but that's stupid.
It sure is

That's the fashos.

>he unironically uses the term "[insert term connected to my ideology with a negative connotation]"

I can't even tell anymore. Basically what said, but really any modern economic system will do that.

No one on the left takes Adorno seriously. We all see him as a pretentious useless half baked ideologue. What every righty means by cultural marxism is judeo-bolshevism. Because even their propaganda is ou of date.

>marxists
>content to sit and wait
pretty sure every marxist since forever has wanted to help speed the process up a bit. If you're a marxist, wouldn't it be terribly immoral not to?

Well how would you speed the process up?

I'd encourage complete and total laissez faire capitalism, it's called accelerationism.

>If you're a marxist, wouldn't it be terribly immoral not to?

Well Marx literally said that it'll just happen naturally if you wait it out like how feudalism converted to capitalism.

How would that actually help? I can understand accelerating the material conditions, but how would accelerating the subversion of institutions help? I want to hear a non-marxist like you explain it.

>he voted for trump

>he voted for Trump
>he voted for Clinton
>xe voted for Stein
>he voted for a Leppo
>he voted for McMuffin
>he voted for La Riva
>he voted
>he didnt go out and vote

That's an impressive number of votes to make in one day

>he didnt hop from voting district to voting district using the voting registrations from the local obituaries

>I'd encourage complete and total laissez faire capitalism, it's called accelerationism.
more like hypocrisy

That's the smuggest Nigel I've ever seen. Top pip

>more like hypocrisy

that's one way of looking at it.

the other is to see it as a sort of bizzare faith or belief in marx's theory.

I'm not a marxist and I don't know much about it, but I suppose I might establish some sort of intellectual vanguard who use their sway in academia to push inherently flawed political tautology based heavily on identity since, as a multicultural society, that seems to be America's Achillie's heel. I think that ideology would look something like what I've heard described as intersectional feminism.

But I wouldn't stop there, I would attempt to use a bait and bleed strategy (ala Mearsheimer ?) throughout all aspects of society by again fostering tribalism along lines of gender/race/class/political party. This would take advantage of the competitiveness that lies at the heart of capitalism.

Ideally, I'd use the media to do a lot of this work for me, again using capitalism itself as a useful vehicle. Well, I guess marketing does a lot of this. I guess the tv networks and hollywood do a lot of this kind of thing also. It would be great if I could let these industries (advertising, tv, movies) fall under the control a single tribe, especially if that tribe is guided only by profit motive and not so much by the greater good of that society.

So something like that. But I'm sure if I thought about it a little more I could come up with something even better.

How dare you use this Canadian man for this shit thread...Question; tell me your opinion on blonde men in Scandinavia or in Germany?

And how would this cause capitalism to collapse?

Socialism was at its peak in the Gilded Age and had a resurgence since 08 so that is some evidence for accelerationism

hello leftypol discord

really?

Well, their would be ever increasing inequality along lines of tribal identity. An underclass would develop and social problems would become rampant. Crime would increase. The government would collapse under the weight of all this assuming things didn't degenerate on their own into outright civil war. Those with enough money would buy private estates in new zealand and build bunkers while pushing a globalist agenda to suck ever more money out of the rapidly decaying corpse of liberal democracy.

Am I being trolled?

The endgame you described doesn't entail the death of capitalism, only the current State or 'liberal democracy''s collapse

Instead of preaching class equality they preach cultural equality.
boys = girls
east = west
Leads to shit like
youtube.com/watch?v=_tOkb1y7hEs

ok, so this is the problem. what do you mean by capitalism? Are you talking about any private ownership of the means of production?

really?

Of fucking course.

Am I being trolled?

I haven't studied this stuff, but I don't think it's possible to get rid of all private ownership so there is no way to rid the world of your definition of capitalism.

I can always sing and produce a song.

That may be true, but I am not questioning the feasibility of the endgame you think these Marxists have in mind, but the nature of the endgame. Regardless of whether you think capitalism can die, this bizarre gameplan that you think Marxists have in mind doesn't end with the death of capitalism. Which seriously undermines its validity

So I ask again, how does all these subversion lead to the death of capitalism?

Are you denying the reality of cold war geopolitics?

I want to understand what you're getting at, but I really don't.

There's evidence of soviet interference in American politics and culture. It didn't start with Putin's secret conspiracy with Trump rob Hillary of the presidency.

Why are you shifting the goalposts from Marxists' subversion to Soviet's interference?

>I want to understand what you're getting at, but I really don't.
You claimed that marxists want to accelerate the death of capitalism by subversion of cultural institutions
I asked how
The gameplan you described didn't end with the death of capitalism only the State
So I called bullshit
You then claimed capitalism can't die
And I said that it doesn't change why the endgame of Marxists doesn't involve the death of capitalism
And now you are talking Soviet Russia's interference? Stay on topic or just admit you don't know shit

its thrown around way too easily these days