I'm trying to learn more about prehistoric Europe...

>egyptian book of the dead
What the actual fuck does that have to do with prehistory?

>ancient European worshipped the supreme mother goddess
well at least there is archaeological evidence to support that hypothesis

>Yes, most archaeologists actually believe this crap
no they don't

Oh, because we have the text where the people that produced that statue describe it as a supreme mother goddess, right?

No, we don't, and you and your gang of pre-historic fan-fic authors are full of shit.

many pre indo-european feminine idols have been discovered but no male ones have so the evidence clearly points in that direction. its ironic that youre getting emotional about this issue instead of evaluating the data objectively mr manly man

Or instead of mystic idols, they could be prehistoric porno. Besides men tend to be more autistic about pussy than women are about dick

>Yes, most archaeologists actually believe this crap.
Umm... no, I don't think so.

whatever helps you sleep at night tough guy

Seems like you are the one that needs to be right to be able to sleep at night, more then the guy whom is actually asking a few questions.

im just posting the evidence which is more than anyone else itt has done

>dodging the question
Besides it would make more sense considering we have modern day president of men using them as something to suppress their crippling loneliness

yeah I would totally fap to a carved stone

if you want to adopt that interpretation that is your prerogative but i doubt many archaeologists would agree with you

Not the same guy, but I think I get his point. He's not challenging the evidence, he's challenging your interpretation of it. The idea that the idols depict a singular goddess is unlikely. The idols aren't necessarily religious either, nor does worship of goddesses necessarily imply matriarchy. Gimbutas is making logical leaps that are probably influenced by her political views.

When porn never existed and the smartest of your kind was working on the revolutionary technology of red ochre paint and stone spearhead number 132 a carved stone is the best you're gonna get

>well at least there is archaeological evidence to support that hypothesis

Logic must still be used when speculating on how the society was structured and functioned.

You can find lots of crucifixes in Mexico but that doesn't mean the country is model of Christian perfection.

when caveman fancied a fuck he only needed to make a hand gesture to any women of the tribe, they were happy simple folks

you can interpret the figurines however you like but given the prevalence of fertility goddesses in other cultures i think it is more likely that they served a cultic purpose rather than just being fap fuel but believe whatever you want

but it does mean that jesus christ is considered a deity by a large percentage of the population

Or in a primitive society where might makes right, the strongest warrior and his henchmen took all the pussy for themselves?

Probably, but that doesn’t mean ancient European society was a feminist chick flick, as modern SJW academics claim.

And the beta males had to satisfy themselves with stone waifus? Truly this is the greatest historical question of our time

sharing is caring

ok well instead of arguing against a strawman maybe you should read the thread and see that my only point has been the hypothesis that pre indo-europeans worshiped a supreme mother goddess has archaeological evidence to support it

>future archaeologists will think we worshipped lewd anime figurines

These figurines were probably not much than fapping tools

One of the reasons anthropologists believe prehistoric hunter gatherers were more egalitarian is from studies of modern or recent hunter gatherer populations and how modernization has affected them.

Ahhahahahhahahaja epic. Except that They were often buried with them and as soon as They got agricultural They started putting them in their temples

youtube is not a valid source of information Brian

They have found a mesolithic one in Sardinia too though it has the head of a capibara

>tfw future archeologists will determine that a weaboo who decided to get buried with his figurine collection and $60 mail order katana was a mighty warrior buried with his weapon and collection of religious statues

>His NEET bedroom full of Anime posters was a place of worship for the many Godlike Dieties anime NEETS worshiped in order to grant them good fortune or a 3DPD gf

You retards are a lost cause

Watch he Norwegian "Brainwash" docs series episode on Violence. It's on YouTube. They cover that theory and how debunked it is

...

Neolithic and paleolithic are different eras, retard, and anyway the earliest neolithic figurines are obviously females

>comparing fucking bronze age Crete, a complex urban stratified society with mesolithic Europe, a place inhabited by hunter gatherers living in small nomadic communitues without social stratification

>influenced by political

If you look at this period and find that there's a fuckton of artifacts in the form of feminine figures, none of men, and you also realize that fertility cult was very common in a variety of cultures along a vast area of Europe, perhaps, just perhaps, those are good enough grounds to speculate that there was a wide prevalence of worship of goddesses associated to fertility cult as opposed to any other interpretation.

>Gimbutas was a feminist

Retard.

>But "I was not a feminist and never had any thought I would be helping feminists," she said.

This is why /pol/tards shouldn't be allowed to make threads, because you can't make any rational criticisms other than buzzwords.

And worshipping a goddess of fertility automatically means a matriarchal feminist paradise, gotcha

Your post is quite ironic

This isn't a body of young fertile woman. This is a body of old woman past her prime that stays at the fire and takes care of the kids while others go hunting and gathering.

More of protectors of the fire and raisers of children, rather than fertility goddesses or even fap material.

We’re still talking about humans here, where a bazillion years of evolution hard-wired into us a philosophy of “tits or get the fuck out”.

Just because Neolithic humans had statuettes of women, doesn’t automatically lead to a matriarchal feminist society where stronk womyn ruled the roost, especially when there is little or no additional evidence to support this theory and the archeological evidence clearly shows males were of a higher standing and in fact evidence from ritual burials, appears to show that even dogs had a higher status then women.

How do we know that this isn't the prehistoric equivalent of porn?

>I'm trying to learn more about prehistoric Europe
>post picture of Peru

Or they are just dolls.

You have no reason to believe one over the other.

>archeological evidence clearly shows males were of a higher standing

No

> and in fact evidence from ritual burials, appears to show that even dogs had a higher status then women.

This is your brain on /pol/ and virginity

> This is your brain on /pol/ and virginity
Roastie detected