Is neoliberalism the best ideology?

Is neoliberalism the best ideology?
All successful countries are neoliberal, one way or the other

>One way or another
May as well claim that socialism is the best ideology, since all successful countries are socialistic, one way or another.

...

>Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism[1] refers primarily to the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.[2]:7
This is both history and humanities related

Depends what you mean by successful.
China can be considered economically successful but no one wants to live there.

Are you implying China isn't neoliberal?

It takes decades to lift a country as big as China out of poverty brainlet. Individually China is still poor but it is improving every day.

if you mean exploitation of the weaker while saying you are helping them then yes

>Is neoliberalism the best ideology?
No.

>All successful countries are neoliberal, one way or the other
Now I consider US, Germany, France, UK and Canada are "failing" countries.

China is not a "neoliberal" country, only TW is "neoliberal region" and it's also failing now. I'm from TW.

And Sweden, btw.

I will never live in those country.

what is your metric for "falling"?
Best living standards? Strongest industry? Best military? Highest GDP? Beeing member of G8 and G20?

Welfare is anti-socialist. There are barely any countries that practice any kind of socialism at all.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is neoliberalism basically libertarianism except strictly talking about economics? Versus libertarian being economic and social

>Welfare is anti-socialist

Why?

It keeps the masses comfortable enough to not want socialism. It was literally put in place by Bismark to prevent SPD from growing in influence

Because it eases class consciousness and makes the workers more willing to accept capitalist exploitation. There would be no welfare in a socialist state, their mantra is "if you don't work, you don't eat".

Both are economically and politically illiterate

There is no such thing as "neoliberalism". What happened in the past decades was a process of privatization, not liberalization.

Acceleeationist bullshit, welfare is currently as good as it will get for the working class, there will be no revolution

You asked why socialists don't support welfare, you got your answer. Why do you think HURR NO REVOLUTION is a relevant or interesting response?

Fuck you

You sure proved how intelligent and well-considered your idiotic ideas are with that stupid cartoon, moron.

Fag

ofc it is.

thank mr dank bank man

learn basic economics cuck

scary brown people and the gays exist, ergo failed state you fucking marxist cuck :^)

Ahhhh, the starving mongoloid needs rubles. Have four (You)'s Dmitri and buy your family a slice of bread.

Classical Liberalism > neo-liberalism

>Now I consider US, Germany, France, UK and Canada are "failing" countries.
Well luckily for everyone else, your definition of "failing" isn't the one commonly used by anyone else.

Neoliberalism encompasses a wide variety of right-wing ideologies. The Austrian School is much more libertarian than the Chicago School, for example, but both are definitively neoliberal. The average neoliberal supports too many international institutions to really be considered a libertarian, while libertarians think that the whole world will just trade freely with each other without any institutions somehow.

Neoliberalism destrpies countries without an developed industrial infrastructure while enriches countries that do, plus most of the population lives like shit (labor flexibility, low social help) while the rich get disgustingly. Companies getting money doesn't mean normal people do.

>Neoliberalism encompasses a wide variety of right-wing ideologies
>tfw there are people that think Neoliberalism is a left-wing ideology just because it has the word 'liberal' in it

>when people think that liberals are left-wing even when liberalism is literally the core principle of the right

Spotted the cuckservative dweeb. I would bet any amount of money you are nonwhite except in your mind of course.

>liberalism is literally the core principle of the right

>China can be considered economically successful but no one wants to live there.
China was literally Sub-Saharan African tier thirty years ago, now it's actually pretty decent. That is an enormous victory for liberal economics by any reasonable standard.

The right was the original opposition to liberalism. Do you even know where the left-right dichotomy originated?

>He still doesn't know that "liberal" in the U.S means right of centre conservative in Europe

>free market is left wing

>liberal only means 'free market'

Neoliberalism? What IS neoliberalism? People don't call themselves neoliberals (except recently, and as a reaction to the use of the word as an insult).

liberalism is trash, in both economy and society

Neoliberalism usually refers to a modern day offshoot of laissez-faire capitalism. Ronald Reagan would be considered a neoliberal in this sense.

It has nothing to do with social liberalism.

>liberal means "leftist"

>"leftist" is anything but a snarl world referring to anyone to the left of Hitler

You've been a skilled shitposter user. Too skilled, and I'm afraid I can't let you live. Die now.

>people on Veeky Forums are such contrarian cucks that they are willing to adopt an ideology that dicks over everyone except the 1%
You guys are literally retarded.

also how FDR quelled the socialist, commie, anarchist and labor movement.

literally how most (smart) capitalists deal with commies before they resort to violence to put the socialists down.

don't get me wrong socialists tend to be split on this, but no socialist would say "no" to welfare. it IS definite, material gains for the working class. the problem is that most people ONLY want welfare, think welfare is enough to solve capitalism's problems, or that labor movements tend to stop fighting once welfare is won.

20th century showed us why that is shit, also why the state of the left is as it is.

also not an accelerationist, but accelerationism isn't necessarily bad or not good for the movement. Shit, a lot of commies and socialisy parties that have been extremely anti-acceleration have noted that the US going to shit and especially Trump getting elected lit a fire under people's ass and we've had our numbers grow faster and larger than ever this year because of it. Accelerationism is painful for the working class, but just like the capitalist class, the working class works best and does more when it feels in danger, and there is no way you can say otherwise historically. The trick is literally every other glaring problem brought about by accelerating shit.

It had to do w/ the french, the left were liberals and the conservatives were the clergy/nobles/etc.

Here's the thing though, mr-meme-history-degree, that was over the question of capitalism vs feudalism. Capitalists won that fight. The question now is socialism or barbarism (capitalism), and the liberals are now the ones fighting to keep the status quo, but they're still liberal, still right-wing when the question is "socialism or capitalism?".

Somehow I think you don't understand what neoliberalism is.
If you're using it in the sense I think you do, "neoliberalism" exists since early 80's, and this is 2017, so in the light of obvious social, demographic, cultural and economic issues which are growing in the West, I have to conclude you're either retarded, or a contrarian troll.

>All successful neo-liberal countries are A*glo countries.
ftfy
>inb4 A*glo and Chicago school influenced city states and southern shitholes.

Communist secularism and social capitalism are the best systems for the rest of the planet, inflation and shortages included.

Only retarded americans could come up with such a retarded brain dead ideology, that legitimately believes that an economy is only plusses and minuses in public spending and how much money you can print/borrow from banker loan sharks.

I hate america and I am glad China's unbridled state capitalism will crush the weak and pathetic americanism which Americans export in their cultural/financial imperialism.

>blaming Americans for Neoliberalism
It was (((Americans))) actually

>china will crush america
factories are already leaving for the cheaper parts of the world tho

>le burgers dindu nuffin we good bois
No fuck off, this is all entirely the fault of your mongrel, decadent nation, led by the nose by Israel to do its bidding.

You can't separate jews from their American puppets, both are equally guilty, all my life I am waiting for the moment your shit degenerate nation burns in nuclear fire.

Look at all the butthurt commies in this thread that are upset the government won't create a utopia where they get paid to go to starbucks and watch interracial porn all day long

We're discussing neoliberalism here. Stay on topic you mornoic sycophant dog. Maybe if you keep it up they will reward you with benefits! Oh golly!

>I don't understand how development works
Also automation soon user

Communism?

Neoliberalism isn't an ideology.
If you mean liberal capitalism, they're far less retarded than communists economically, but complete morons when it comes to social policy:
>diversity is good even though literally every statistic says otherwise