If Hitler allied with Stalin this entire area would be controlled by just 3 countries

If Hitler allied with Stalin this entire area would be controlled by just 3 countries.

and it would be a much better place

Indeed.
Germany has creativity and science.
Russia understands psychology and terror.
Japan are efficient worker bees.

These 3 autistic nations together would have colonized the entire universe.

There's no way they can control that much land efficiently. They'd be super pressed to keep China, Persia and India under control let alone every other state in existence.

Stalins Russia was basically Nationalistic Socialism anyway

Why are you forgetting the Caribbean theatre of ww2?

There was never anything socialist about the Soviet Union. People think the Nazis stole the "socialist" label, but it is actually fucking vice versa. Germany had unemployment benefits, pension, vacations etc... already in fucking 1900. A German lived better in the 30s than a Russian today. Germany was always the most socialist country on earth, because what does socialist mean? It means the state takes good care of the workers and treats them good.

It was never about all that fucking globalism crap which a bunch of edgy Russian and Jewish intellectuals with megalomania invented.

Socialism deals with the means of production. Not those things you listed

>because what does socialist mean? It means the state takes good care of the workers and treats them good.

Why are you posting here?

German mistakes all surround their trust of the West, prove me wrong.
>inb4 communist/nazbol accusations
>inb4 anglo-frank-polish-czecho-etc... judeo-masonic shills

>OP still believe western propaganda about the intention of Germany and Japan to conquer the entire continent

Go look at a random 1939 world map. England, France and Soviet Russia alones, the "liberators", ruled around 2/3 of the world, not including the USA

Germany and Japan merely wanted to have some satellite states around them

While you're right in many of your assertions, that's not what socialism is. It was a welfare state.

Do you think we might have had a porno of Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini gangbanging Anne Frank?

>It's a general plan Ost don't real episode

>what does socialist mean? It means the state takes good care of the workers and treats them good.
>Socialism is when the government does stuff
Please stop posting

>western propaganda
Like Goebbels' diary?

>The Führer gave expression to his unshakable conviction that the Reich will be the master of all Europe. We shall yet have to engage in many fights, but these will undoubtedly lead to most wonderful victories. From there on the way to world domination is practically certain. Whoever dominates Europe will thereby assume the leadership of the world.

>the Marxist definition of Socialism is the ONLY valid definition of Socialism
I'm not even that guy, but fuck off, every single one of you

>what does socialist mean? It means the state takes good care of the workers and treats them good.

It's not the Marxist definition, though, it's the English language definition.

No, they would have jerked each other off for a few decades only to collapse under retarded economic policies, then have their corpses scooped up by American liberalism.

They would holocaust the shit out of the jewmerica and instead of making the whole world a shithole, it would only be contained to US.

>not being nazbol

>Germany was always the most socialist country on earth, because what does socialist mean? It means the state takes good care of the workers and treats them good.

The world would unironically be wealthier and more peaceful had GP ost been carried out. That said, it was far too expensive and impractical to have ever been undertaken. Hitler would most likely have just crapped out a few pro-german puppet governments in Ukraine and the Baltics then given up. The Reich would have collapsed under its backwards economic policies and crippling debt ala the Soviets and the world would be a better place.

It IS the Marxist definition. Socialism was already a thing before that definition was written.

The post you're replying to was reffering to the German Empire, not the nazis. Clearly you're a braindead communist looking for any excuse to excrete your contrived attempt at "memes" wherever possible.

Socialism was already a thing and already meant workers owning the means of production. The definition isn't from Marxism, Marxism is just a form of socialism.

>Whoever dominates Europe will thereby assume the leadership of the world.
I would have loved to see the Nazis try to conquer the world and then get absolutely BTFO desu.

>Socialism was already a thing and already meant workers owning the means of production.
[citation needed]

? If they had taken all of Europe, defeating Britain and the USSR or allying them, the only other industrial power that could have faced them would be the USA.

Why would the US have to even fight them? They could just arm insurgenices in whatever part of the world the Nazis decide to invade. It'll be even worse if they invade America.