Atrocities

What kind of atrocities did german,italian and japanese civilians have to endure by Allied soldiers?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marocchinate
youtube.com/watch?v=g6IFfQdM7EI
whale.to/b/bacque1.html
nytimes.com/books/98/11/22/specials/ambrose-atrocities.html
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schieder_commission
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

extinction

The French people under American-French occupation suffered at the hands of the Resistance and Americans. 1000s of French people were murdered by the French Resistance.

mercy.

Marocchinate

Mostly rape

Bombings, lots of bombings

Liberation

Nothing that they didn't deserved.

Straight outta /pol/

Germans tried to genocide several races from earth. Fuck you. They deserve every rape by red army monkeys

Source?

When your nation attempts to exterminate another's race from existence (Slavs), you better expect that they return the favour once they cross the border.

Implying civs had anything to do with this
Also, even Stalin purposefully starved out a bunch of his citizens.

You know it was illegal in the Red Army too right? How'd that work out again?

>German soldiers didnt rape
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>They were very honorable an respectful
lol

>german soldiers
>posts an SS man
By law the man you posted is not even recognised as a soldier

Collectivist scum.

He was according to the German state

Not according to the current german state :^)
>inb4 the reich was never legally dissolved

Nazism was a collectivist ideology too.

So you're applying current legality to a conflict 60+ years ago to absolve Germany of war crimes?

This was legality established in 1945, so it is rather relevant to the conflict.
And I do not deny that the German state at that time had commited war crimes, I am just stating that the man posted and all other SS-men are not represented in any way by the current German state, and thus Germany is not responsible for their crimes

>Germany is not responsible for their crimes
No one claimed they were though, you seem awfully defensive about this

Jugoslavian soldiers killed and kicked out all Italians from Istria.

French Colonial troops in Ciociaria (the area around Montecassino) were promised to do whatever they wanted, so as long they took a few Hills in 12 hours. They did, and the commanders let them rape at their heart's content: to this day, you can find the occasional mulatto; it's the only part of Italy where there's a serious "the good Nazi" narrative; and the French government treated it as a state secret until this year.

Thousands of germans and nips being burned alive at dresden and tokyo, japs having 60 out of 70 cities bombed to destruction, then having two abombs dropped on them

Up to 1million german girls raped by russians, violent expulsions of 14m germans in soviet claimed territory, up to 2-3m died in the journey

lmao ius victoris faggot

None really,if anything g*rm women saw some real men for once.

Degenerates white americans

This narrative is questioned by modern German historians. It's more likely that some 600.000 people died during the expulsion which was largely the Nazis fault because they delayed the evacuation.

I think those figures come from counting the initial exodus when the war was still happening rather than solely the Polish border change and Czech expulsion

They are clearly exaggerated and first appeared in 1950s in West Germany.

Obviously not from /pol/ you mong he favors the Jewish side

French people that had collaborated with Germans

Japs just got a taste of their own fucking medicine is all

This

French cities were bombed to ashes, for no reason given the small number of German troops effectively on site.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marocchinate

>yfw French make movies and TV shows about their noble Maghrebian pets and how they were treated so badly
>tfw Maghrebians enslaved, raided and destroyed the coast of South Europe for centuries yet whine about 40 years of French colonialism like it was anudda Shoah

I hate Maghrebis far, far more than Gulfies or even Turks. Bunch of literal Quadroons.

decolonization of North Africa after WWII was a massive mistake. Should've let the Italians keep Libya, the French Algeria and Tunisia, and split Morocco between Spain and Portugal. Then developed a Coptic state in coastal Northern Egypt

no Ar*bic shithole should touch the Mediterranean

Fake

...

Or just mentally decolonized the Berber Christians and given them their own states, create a Copt state as you say etc.

These mentally colonized Maghrebians are just slaves for Arab imperialism, always have been.

Vae Victis

Stop impersonating me and kill yourself

genocide them would be more easy :( and use the land for real people

Not enough to make up for killing Anne Frank

I don't want to go full /pol/ with what I'm about to say, since it is entirely a sweeping generation and individual cases may be different.

But from my experience (and looking at history) it's funny how always the ethnic groups most bitter about White colonialism were the lighter-skinned nonwhite-passing groups: lighter-skinned mestizos and mulattoes in the Americas, Maghrebis in North Africa, coloureds in South Africa, Gujaratis in India, Japanese in East Asia, and so on.

It's like being stuck between two worlds leads to identity conflicts that have to be solved by radically siding with one side or the other.

>Fight in a war just to rape and murder some innocent women.
I will never comprehend it.

Given the Shit Germans did to the Countries they occupied, The Atrocities they suffered were at best Light reprisals

Germans Deserved Everything they got and then some.
youtube.com/watch?v=g6IFfQdM7EI

a million german soldiers were starved to death after the war was over.

whale.to/b/bacque1.html

Lie debunked by real historians.

proof please and thank you

Burden of proof lies on you

not enough apperentyly

given spam in their usaid rations

not him, but a short article by Stephen Ambrose on the topic


nytimes.com/books/98/11/22/specials/ambrose-atrocities.html

>Our second conclusion was that when scholars do the necessary research, they will find Mr. Bacque's work to be worse than worthless. It is seriously -- nay, spectacularly -- flawed in its most fundamental aspects. Mr. Bacque misuses documents; he misreads documents; he ignores contrary evidence; his statistical methodology is hopelessly compromised; he makes no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in its relationship to the broader situation; he makes no attempt to look at comparative contexts; he puts words into the mouth of his principal source; he ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively deals with his central accusation; and, as a consequence of these and other shortcomings, he reaches conclusions and makes charges that are demonstrably absurd.

Sounds a lot like David Irving

Not again

Oh no! Muh nazi collaborators and sympathizers got executed!!!!1

these figures were made up by former Nazi's like Conze

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schieder_commission

Basically propaganda by ex Nazis

>For no reason
The air campaign over northern France had a very explicit and well known purpose: crippling German logistics in order to assist Overlord and the Normandy break out. They didn't do it for the fuck of it. The air campaign was very carefully planned and well orchestrated. A little too well orchestrated as it ended up doing just as much damage to Allied logistics in the long run, thus the clusterfuck at Market Garden and the inability to maneuver at Metz and the Westwall.

>What kind of atrocities did german,italian and japanese civilians have to endure by Allied soldiers?

Does it matter?

The usual abuses by occupying forces, but at least it wasn't generally sanctioned by the state.

None of the occupied Axis were the victim of large scale massacres and abuse, which is generous when one considers how unpleasant they had been.