Thinking time is linear

linear against what?

Quantum Figurnality.

Nice refutation idiot. Analytic philosophy is firmly in the eternalist camp, this isn't to propose it is linear rather that the state of change exists outside our perception. It is a 3-dimensional block.

youtube.com/watch?v=vrqmMoI0wks

Wibbly wobbly timey wimey... stuff.

>it effectively
Nice qualifier faggot
>cross-section of individuals
Hohoho... Ha.. HAHAHAHAHA

Time is an arch through which I pass

Time is flat, NASA is hiding it from us

Time is a escelator moveing up and we are running down, eventually we can't compete with the escelator and we will be transported to the second floor.

>all analytics agree on ontology of time

if time wasn't linear then you could have replied to this post before i made it to prove me wrong.

what is an actual argument that time isn't linear, without relying on some random religious shit about cyclical time like the vedas or buddhism?

LINEAR AGAINST WHAT????

but time is just movement, movement requires space, space is in 3 dimensions? When you break it all down, it is easiest to plot it on a graph.

Of course they don't, but the vast majority agree that presentism and the a-theory in general (linearity)faces serious issues in justification.

>time is just movement
How fast does time past then? If you can't answer this then it is not movement

do watches and calendars not count? i feel like thats the wrong thing to say from your post

one time unit per time unit

...

>what is daylight savings
>what is industrial time
>calenders when they have been altered since their inception

Time is linear with repeating patterns, brainlet.

>he's an A-theorist

>the vast majority agree
source

>he thinks time is a circle
point, line, plane, solid

He doesn't read monthly philosophy journals

>presume that time is linear
>develop some of the most accurate and precise models of reality in humanity
So can anybody tell me why we allow idiot "metaphysicists" who's never taken one single physics class to comment on what is and isn't reality?

how can it be a concept of man when it can shift depending on your place in the physical universe

Time is 2 dimensional extending forwards backwards upwards and downwards. Consciousness is similar to a function mapping experience values to moments in time and space. Our experience function is linear and monotonically increasing causing us to experience time as linear as well.

citation needed

>thinking time exists

No user, you are the brainlet. What we observe as time is just a measurement of the motion of particles (shut up Zeno, motion exists and we can prove it mathematically).

>claims time doesn't exist
>proceeds to explain why time exists
Are you fucking retarded? lfmao

Motion is not time.

>everything
Time is a notion emergent from motion. It parameterizes motion, which makes it every bit as real as any other formal objects.

It no more exists than any other measurement exists.

Completely false. Time exists with motion. As long as there is motion time will always be there and definable. And in fact if no notion of time can be defined then no motion is possible. Its existence predicates upon and leads to the existence of motion.

that's a made up word

You're make an erroneous leap. Time is not require for motion to exist, motion is required for us to come up with a notion of time, but the notion of time is just that, a notion. It has no more a real existence than a meter does.

>Time is not require for motion to exist
Never said this. I said an appropriate notion of time exists whenever motion exists. It's your own problem that you're conflating what you think time is with a notion thereof.

>Its existence predicates upon and leads to the existence of motion.

So you didn't say this then? For the existence of time to lead to the existence of motion, time would be required for motion.

The "it" in that sentence meant the notion of time. And since time is intangible the existence of a notion of it is sufficient for the existence of it.

fucking checked

>Time is not require for motion to exist
motion literally requires that at t1, X is at one point and at later t2, X is at another point
it is absolutely impossible to conceive of motion without time
>motion is required for us to come up with a notion of time
no
you could imagine a spaceless existence with a disembodied conscious observer being aware of time only by the sequence of its own thoughts
kant made essentially that point 300 years ago already

>you could imagine a spaceless existence with a disembodied conscious observer being aware of time only by the sequence of its own thoughts
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_language_argument
Thought / consciousness / qualia are arguably meaningless to the point of non-existence without an external world to reference to.

time is literally a spook. it only exists in our minds.

Time is not a spook I can see the time above your post.

then just imagine somebody without the sense of sight or touch, or someone with locked-in syndrome
the point was just that it's not necessary to draw the idea of time from the idea of motion
what kant said was that the idea of time can be drawn from "inner sense"

>This is why you guys will always been brainlets.

>ball of plasma moves an inch across the sky
>WOOOAH TIME IS MOVING FORWARD
fucking brainlets

Time = space, if you're moving through one you're simultaneously moving through the other

wth, move this thread to Veeky Forums already

Bugger off.

>Time is a social construct