Tfw capitalism destroyed gender roles

They are only opposed to the caricature of capitalism. Feminism is a major meme anyways. Technology and the post-industrial society changed things not grouchy old lesbians.

funny how all the people have no qualms about indulging in shit like malls and supermarkets.
really gets the ol noggin joggin

OP probably is a 50's fetishist but whatever

...

Capitalism is scat

Yes. Capitalism also made you a permavirgin and killed your pet goldfish.

nope

>capitalism forcing anyone into anything
You are talking about nature. Scarcity and struggle is the natural state. What's true for wolves and rabbits is true for human beings. Women and children worked before "capitalism" and they come back to work every now and then.

Yeah. Men used to have babies and groups of big strong women would go about hunting before Adam Smith came around and invented capitalism.

Even when they're working in ammunition factories, women are the primarily caretakers and men are fighters.
Women would temporarily fill leadership duties when men left on week-long hunts too. This is not a shift in gender roles. It's an ancient tradition.

and this is bad because...?

no need to take out your virgin rage on here

>literal communists are capitalism

you're partially right (if you look at marx's view of history, capitalism will basically be forced to evolve into socialism, but that's another story)

most of the actual mover's and shakers of "women's lib" weren't communists at all, "Liberated single/professional Women" are/were a great new market to sell too. They'd also provide an easy source for unskilled labor, and at a lower cost since women are generally socialized to be more meek (they won't ask for a raise nearly as much as men).

>most of the actual mover's and shakers of "women's lib" weren't communists at all
They were Jews, same difference

>*nothing personnel kiddo*

>anti-capitalism
anti-capitalism is capitalism

I GUARANTEE that edit was made by a man.

>majority of feminist are anti-capitalist
Of all your deceitful post, this is the worst

I'd love to live in a time where a single income households can exist AND women can go into the workforce with equal pay and rights as men. Best of both worlds.

Why do feminists like to call anyone who disagrees with them "virgins"? If you are not married there is nothing wrong with being a virgin.

>I'd love to live in a time where a single income households can exist

Barring a short period it never was a thing

*Cringe*

I think the wars did that. There were no men to work so the women took their jobs and stayed there.

>sexual revolution was anti-capitalist
If a self-proclaimed communist promotes an idea that becomes readily adopted by a capitalist society who is ultimately responsible? If the 'sexual revolution' was 'anti-capitalist' wouldn't it have been rejected by capitalist societies? Did we not see on the contrary that the forces most ardently opposed to trends like "womens lib" and "government funded contraception" didn't come from the owners of capital (newspapers, periodicals, tv networks, radio networks etc...) but from religious advocates, especially catholics whose opposition stem from beliefs that predate modern capitalism? Meanwhile didn't many capital owners find a way to profit off these trends, and others have a direct pecuniary interest in seeing them go forward like Pharmaceutical companies and allowing contraception?

It seems to me Capitalism by its nature tends to have little respect or interest in tradition or moral law and that the most faithful defenders of those institutions are people motivated by something other than economic interest

It's not even the problem, the women in China and Vietnam probably aren't exactly stay at home housewives and probably punch in their hours at factories and fields or whatever. The issue in the capitalist world is with the extortionate justice systems and its workers who are more concerned with screwing around and working their way up the ladder so they can afford the designer fashion lines they want and politicians campaigning laws to gain brownie points.

Just say it user, "I'm a National Socialist."

Only in the figurative sense.

yeah user, (((capitalism))).

You mean created them. The stay-in-the-kitchen meme only started with the industrial revolution.

gender roles seem to go back to prehistory which makes sense considering the precarious nature of pre-modern childbirth

This is completely delusional.

>capitalism

Before the new poor laws in Britain at least it was rather common for women to work in what we would now consider to be men's work.

I'm still not sure what's so bad about women joining the workforce and doing things outside what you'd expect from women.

I mean, I oppose the aspect of it as it relates to increasing supply in the workforce and decreasing worker wages but that's more of a critique of capitalism. However, half the time when people complain about the destruction of gender roles it's not about wage suppression but instead because they think it's corrupting society which I can't figure out. If men can be free to try their hand at a profession if they have the skills and experience necessary, why shouldn't women?

>and this is bad because...?
>
>no need to take out your virgin rage on here

Because its a taunt to try and get somebody to fuck them, since nobody wants

It's projection

because we are constantly being lectured that x is oppresive or bigoted if it doesn't have 50% women

Japan and South Korea are hyper-capitalist and they still have their gender roles intact.

It were the Jews, I tell you.

Not since tolerance became a meme.

>he thinks women took care of children before modern capitalism
Proof that you never read anything about raising children before 1800.

Women are subhuman

This is why they should not take care of my son. Thanks for bolstering my point.

>Rich women represent everyone before 1800

Well yeah. Women shouldn't be involved in anything related to children and that includes birth.

>he thinks social history is still stuck in the 70s and only looks at the upper classes
I am out now cause you are clearly a brainlet. Just so you know by now historians have pretty much raised a consenus that emotions themselves are historically and socially contingent (and obviously connected to gender roles). And you are still fixed on gender debates. Maybe crack a book from time to time.

Well this is the point that Plato makes and one of the reasons why children should be taken away from them asap and be rasied in the politeia.

Do you have a single source to back that up

>muh social constructionism

You mean the Jews

>The problem with the overly monolithic conception of a “patriarchy” wherein men dominate women both in society and in the family is that while no Bachofen-style “matriarchal” society has been found,4 there is little evidence that until modern times fathers have been very much present in historical families. In our promiscuous chimpanzee ancestors, fathers were quite absent in child-rearing, so there are no “families,”5 only grandmothers and mothers moving about with their children.6
5. Peter J. Wilson, Man, The Promising Primate: The Conditions of Human Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980, p. 63.
6. Adrienne L. Zihlman, “Sex Differences and Gender Hierarchies Among Primates: An Evolutionary Perspective.” In Barbara Diane Miller, Ed., Sex and Gender Hierarchies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 36.

>Evidence of fathers playing any real role in children’s upbringing is simply missing until early modern times. In antiquity, I have been unable to find a single classical scholar who has been able to cite any instance of a father saying one word to his child prior to the age of seven.16 Little children were occasionally shown as used by fathers as sensuous objects-as when in Aristophanes’ Wasps the father says he “routinely enjoys letting his daughter fish small coins from his mouth with her tongue”17-but otherwise, scholars conclude, “In antiquity, women [and children] lived shut away [from men]. They rarely showed themselves in public [but] stayed in apartments men did not enter; they rarely ate with their husbands…they never spent their days together.”18

They're biologically not fit to be in those areas. The fact that more men do over time than women in the same job and the fact construction work appeals to men more than women are proof of this. I worked in a factory, and women tell me to help out on heavy duty work like carrying and lifting packages. You never see women put in these roles voluntarily. They don't have the upper body strenght.

Capitalism only destroyed gender roles because women are consumerist trash and spend more money on useless bullshit than men.
Makeup is a billion dollar industry. What industries that only have a male consumer base that are that lucrative?
Just think about that.

This. For whatever reason, 10-20 years after any major war, a womens revolution of some kind will always emerge.

Actually that would be cultural marxism

>capitalism
>nature
SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU NIGGER FAGGOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I yearn for death solely because I won't have to listen to you pack of faggot retards with no historical knowledge who constantly claim that "capitalism = theory of natural selection"

>chimps are like this
>that means ancient societies were like this too
>lack of evidence in the contrary means proof of my claim

Capitalism was the reason the mercantile and banking classes took control and has an integral part for the rise of the nation state political construct

wolves=rabbits=humans.

>In antiquity, I have been unable to find a single classical scholar who has been able to cite any instance of a father saying one word to his child prior to the age of seven.
That's strange, give that Hector speaks to his infant son in The Iliad.

>What industries that only have a male consumer base that are that lucrative?
Sports. Not entirely male consumer base, but close enough.

capitalism is human nature

...

...

Prove that hierachy doesn't exist naturally

There was no sexual liberation in the Eastern Bloc. Most people there didn't know what the fuck a faggot was until the Berlin Wall fell. Meanwhile the USA and UK readily accepted the sexual revolution without much if any worthwhile resistance. Really makes you think.

No they really don't, most of Japan's men are unironic beta nu-males while South Korea is just a copy paste of American consumerist culture. Shit, doesn't South Korea have a ruling feminist clique?

>tfw gender roles is a social construct
Compare women in Ancient Greece to that of Ancient Sparta. The former had no rights or power while the later had rights and power.

It does...
...where there is no real civilization

>feminist
They weren't feminist.

they like to make everything sex related because thats where they derive their value.

dirty capitalism in Saudi Arabia don't

You've never ever been to either country, correct?

You couldn't be more wrong. Both Korean and Japanese men are extremely feminine. All Korean women are encouraged to go to Uni because a single man cannot support a family. Prostitution in marriages is literally at an all time high.

Not just the men fuck prostitutes BTW, many women do, too, especially in Japan.

t. Lived in gookland for a decade

Women always worked.

They don't work even today. Being employed is a different thing than actually working.

You have to go back.