Why?

Why?

french butthurt, so the region could never be used against them ever again

little did they know literally the entire region will be under german control soon enough

>complaining about french butthurt in a muh trianon thread

Imagine being France in the late 19th and entire 20th century

Justice

romanis
actual poster

France was more successful in that period than Germany.

nice rebuttal, you sure showed them

...

>wahh why did they take away Hungary's non-Hungarian lands

> a country can only exist if all of its lands are 100% ethnically homogenous
wow sounds pretty fucking racist you nazi

I like how nobody questions why Hungary was so big in the first place.

>one of the most powerful European country in history
>why is it so big

this; Hungary was an artificial, multi-ethnic country, similar to Yugoslavia, held together by force
>100% ethnically homogenous
Hungarians were a minority in each and every of those lands; self-determination is a bitch, huh?

>one of the most powerful European country in history
c'mon Atilla, that's low quality bait, step it up

>one of the most powerful European country in history
Maybe, if you're speaking about Austria-Hungary. If you're speaking about Hungary itself, come the fuck on

>So powerful it took Austria losing to Prussia and Italy to get any representation

>Hungarians were a minority in each and every of those lands; self-determination is a bitch, huh?
Still pretty fucking racist. So you're saying white south africans should be allowed their Volkstaat?
nazi scum.

thats a lie gypsy and you aint getting away with it, hope you realise you are never ever joining schengen :^)

Not really, and I'm Hungarian. Only ~40% of the population was Hungarian in the 18th century and that barely changed in the early 19th century. It reached the 50% around 1910. It's easier to learn your history than being mad about injustice and repeating nationalist lies. The sad truth is that the only reason the country made it to the 20th century with it's historical territories intact is the use of police, military and censorship. And that Austria was beaten so hard earlier that they needed every support from the Hungarians.

nice quality arguments to refute my post; also, couldn't care less about schengen
also, tone down on the gypsy meme, look at your own backyard first, 6.1% gypsies in hungary isn't low either. Eastern europeans laughing at each other's gypsy problem is like lepers in the asylum laughing at each other's eaten up faces.

>I know literally nothing about medieval history: the posts

>Eastern europeans laughing at each other's gypsy problem is like lepers in the asylum laughing at each other's eaten up faces
This is true. They should bond and exterminate the gyppers together.

They could've at least kept Transylvania

>Eastern europeans laughing at each other's gypsy problem is like lepers in the asylum laughing at each other's eaten up faces.

I would do that if I would be a leper to be honest.

Yes. The whole 1867-1918 period was overall incredibly lucky for Hungary. Austria gave them all the territories they wanted and a level of autonomy that other nations in the Empire or other minorities in Europe couldn't even dream of.
Hungary invested everything in the Habsburg Dualism option. When the Empire lost everything came crashing down.

> Austria gave them all the territories they wanted and a level of autonomy that other nations in the Empire or other minorities in Europe couldn't even dream of.

Not that they had any other chance. Habsburgs are scum, they always were.

hungarian majority places were taken away too, its on the map, completely unneeded greed by surrounded non nations

theres no arguement, you refuse to read or educate yourself because you are a dumb shit

luckily we arent being called romanis

you know there's a reason the Austro-Hungarian Empire was called "the prison of nations".

Literally every single country at that time was multiethnic. The reason it the AHM was more strained was because of pan-nationalistic movements. Like the pan-slavism fueled by Russia for example.

you forgot abut the annexation of Bosnia

Why do people blame Russia for panslavism

Bosnia was annexed by Austria not by Hungary

Oh, sorry, my bad, went full retard on that

Yeah, let's keep the region where they were hated the most and barely made up 25% of the population. Good one top kek

never mind the fact that most Transylvanian gyppos see themselves as Hungarians and speak some mongrel Magyar as their mother tongue.

They tried to do that in 1919 but the Romanian btfo them in that war.

Fact: Hungarian Soviet Republic was the second communist state after Russia!

>gypsy monkeys beat workers dragged from factories

wew, so proud
why arent you so proud of real wars when you were used as cattle for russians

Hungary was powerful, but never exerted power because its neighbours just cockblocked it
>against them
But Hungary is rightful French land, along with Sicily

Looks like the gypsy monkeys won boi!

>losing a third of your country
>successful

>Literally every single country at that time was multiethnic.

And yet Germany is still better off than France. Really gets the noggin joggin

literal fuck you that's why

Early 20th century nationalism was not kind to the losing sides of wars.

Panslavism may not have began in Russia, but Russia has used it far more extensively and ruthlessly for its imperial agenda than anyone else.

>why did Slavs used Pan-Slavism as an excuse for imperialism instead of countries like France or GB

Hungary in the medieval times conquered much of Austria & Bohemia taking Vienna itself m8

For a whopping time period of five years

this is what Hungars actualy bealive

...or Yugoslavia or Polland