Debunking Protestantism

Post all your arguments where you have won against a protestant, bonus points for facts included

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Petrine_epistles
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Agenda_and_procedure
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great
department.monm.edu/classics/Speel_Festschrift/sundbergJr.htm).
youtube.com/watch?v=5bVEXZ38Vs8
youtube.com/watch?v=LClaSilFlA8
youtube.com/watch?v=oTo2wbfvT9E
youtube.com/watch?v=KHcf3E8qOqA
youtube.com/watch?v=ll0otULYzms
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

You can't win an argument against people who can't accept reality and won't debate on the same terms.
You can't argue with religious people, you just submit them either by force when they're too numerous, or by disdain when they're irrelevant
Source: thousands years of history

Yes I get it , but I still want info on debunking Protestantism user

Protestantism is just one big ad hominem pertetraded by States that wanted the Church under their control

>muh the Vatican is corrupt
>so let's change the theology
>the Catholic theology is wrong
>so let's base our new religion solely on editing catholic writings instead of studying orthodoxy/myaphisites too

The Bible is based on the teachings of Paul who was seen as an impostor by the actual apostles of Jesus. Then it was compiled to fit the Roman agenda at the time.

You can't revive authentic Christianity based only on the Bible. (That means catholicism is also wrong btw).

>muh appeal to tradition

Catholicfags are fucking pathetic

>Paul who was seen as an impostor by the actual apostles of Jesus
Judaizer pls go.

Peter himself refers to Paul's letters as "scriptures" (γραφὰς) meaning he considered them authoritative.

Where do Catholics think tradition came from?

Rome.

literally every lutheran I've ever met was a closet nazi