Dictatorships are more efficient than democracies

>I'm neither an optimist, nor a pessimist
>I'm a realist

>>What is Nazi Germany

whoa so efficient!

Hey, don't talk shit about Ataturk, he did as much as humanly possible to develop Turkey during his rule.

>not even reading the whole post

>What is lobbying
>What is mob rule and mentality
>What is the welfare stare
>What is Autism
These are even more extreme under dictatorships.

>what is lobbying
if it weren't for lobbying, a senator from Florida could put together a law that mandates all cars should run on orange juice. He gets a senator from Iowa to tack on ethanol. He gets a senator from massachusetts to tack on cranberries. Pretty soon, you've got a team of senators who are going to change the face of energy as we know it and without lobbying the energy sector wouldn't be able to but in. Furthermore, it's not like those things decrease under a dictatorship. There might be a slight decline or increase in lobbying under a dictatorship, just look at all the South American dictators who were propped up by the United Fruit Company or the pro-corporate actions of right wing dictators in Latin America (I say this as a right winger myself, I'm not some commie deluded about Allende being some peace loving hippie). The welfare state also increases, just look at the track record of most authoritarian regimes and point out 5 that were actually "libertarian." Singapore had a welfare state under Lee Kuan Yew, they managed it very well but it was still a welfare state; Chile had a welfare state; Francoist Spain had a welfare state; Salazar's Portugal had a welfare state; Fujimori's Peru had a welfare state, etc. etc. Mob rule mentality still happens or did you just casually forget how often dictators engage in ethnic cleansings to keep their support running? A republic based on checks and balances and a heavy helping of technocracy is the ideal political system, analogous to a slightly less authoritarian Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew's leadership.

the only time a democracy gets anything done is when it's at war with a dictatorship and the hyenas go wild

it takes years to get even do the most minute thing here in great """"democracy"""" britain

the 6 years of achievement in 1930s germany is equivalent to about 200 years of democracy in britain

Dictatorships are more easily toppled than democracies.

you got one corrupt government you can choose
1)dictatorship: please kill entire dynasty
2)democracy: please kill everyone

as far as "getting things done" a governemnt works behind the scenes and is a shield for the citizen. If government s doing their job right, a citizen won't notice what the government is doing, the citizen is going about his daily life.
Not worried about being invaded, bombed, or enslaved. In this case there are effective dictatorships, and less effective ones, there are also effective "democracies" as well as less effective ones.

the issue here is which one is easier to deal with once it goes bad. And I think historically it has been easier to deal with a bad dictatorship than a bad democracy.

>What is France under De Gaulle

>What is Yugoslavia under Tito
Can this meme, perpetuated by grandparents who view the past with rose tinted glasses in contrast with the bleak period of the war, finally fucking end.

What exactly did Germany in the 1930's achieve? Some public works, massive military spending and becoming whores to the autarky. Nothing.

>parlamentarism
>efficent

Actually living in a former Soviet bloc country, I can tell you that communism was much more efficient and got things done. Corruption was at a minimum, unlike now where we're literally what ancappies want, a state that practically doesn't exist, a country governed by the mafia.

Yeah, because one big strong manly leader can make the decisions for us so much better than our hive mind
>oh wait

Nazi germany was unique in how poorly planned and confusing the official power structures were. There was the official government and the Nazi's own party structure which was a parallel state within the government which had unclear and overlapping areas of authority, not to mention the constant shuffling of officials and their positions which only further compounded the difficulties.

There's a reason why the romans allowed dictators in their republic from time to time, risking the rise of a king. In times of crisis one capable person taking decissions is more fast and efficient than the parlamentary method. Problem is, it's not a permanent solution.

Switzerland is. Dictatorcucks BTFO!

This, if you want an efficient dictatorship, Nazi Germany's a bad example to use.

Yes Italy has been so much better since 1945 everything has been efficent,mafia has not returned after Il Dvce outlawed it and foreigners are not treated way much better than the italian population.

To this day everything is fine and we are all happy and satisfied with our honest and efficent government.

>tfw you can choose between Democrazia Cristiana or Partito Comunista Italiano and you are happy about it

Maybe he shouldn't have joined Shitler's autistic adventure, eh?

there's nothing inherently efficient about a democracy or a dictatorship. Nice shitpost

Hey guys check out Based democracy in Spain. So glad that fascist Franco is gone and they accepted ebin Democratic liberal meritocracy.

You know, I'm actually a bit enheartened by the fact that this is a pepe and not a brainlet image. What the fuck has happened?

It’s not the type of government that makes a country great it’s the people that do. The United States and Liberia have the same document laying the foundation of their governments yet one is a shithole and the other isn’t.

>The difference is that democracies have ways to prevent shitty leaders from getting into power, mitigate the damage they can do.

The system also mitigates a good leader's ability to get what they want done. When you elect a president in a popular democracy, what you're actually doing is electing the spokesman for the anonymous bureaucracy that they "control".

>the US
>not a shithole

>implying he's wrong

Agreed.

But you know how we are.
Ask to Austria-Hungary.

Dictatorship is just a quick fix with nasty side-effects.

Da real problem is da over-sized burawcracies fuggin everthin up

>heres a real account of a person who suffered under communism you fucking privileged commie
>ignore other people who said it was better they're just crazy old people who view the world through rose colored gasses